Einstein Field: Division Winner Predictions

[sammyjalex]

I have extensive predictions as my scouting obsession tends to drive me, but to avoid harassment from those teams I haven't seen to know how good they are this year or what they can do aside from records I will post my einstein predictions only. Keep in mind my third partner predictions are based on close to nothing for the most part, but I did simulate a full selection for my own personal amusement Also keep in mind while I did avoid my personal team loyalty optimism on my Einstein predictions I didn't on Archimedes. I understand my alliances of 148 359 358, 86 118 1612, 234 71 45, and 330 254 604 are all very very viable winners of Archimedes. It's so competitive I prefer to just assume my former team will strategize so well to get past them all and even 469 and 1114 in my "less realistic" predictions although possible. I apologize if the use of less realistic offends anyone. haha

Archimedes: 25 341 103 over 148 359 358
Curie: 1114 469 2630 over 368 1676 1538
Galileo: 2056 217 1466 over 2016 1717 1696
Newton: 67 16 706 over 842 971 308

Einstein:

1114 469 2630 over 25 341 103
2056 217 1466 over 67 16 706
1114 469 2630 over 2056 217 1466

P.S. With the way this seeding system has worked out it shouldn't come as a surprise that I predicted all my division winners to be first seeds. (except Archimedes, but again it's so competitive and I have a great deal of bias toward the daisies as an alum. I mentioned that the first seed is 359 148 358 in my predictions for that division and logically, I believe that first seed would win the division as well but CMP strategies tend to surprise especially in a division like this. And yes, I do believe 103 will stay around this long. This is what I've found objectively scouting as a volunteer. I would hate for anyone to be offended, I am only trying to preemptively answer questions..which is prbably a bad idea.