|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#106
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
So wish I could be there to watch and root for all the teams especially 1902.
|
|
#107
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Similar to what I did in previous years, I ran through 200 simulated qualification match schedules (all 144 matches, using the FIRST match generator). I used each team's average opr for their contribution to a match. I calculated the standings for each of the 200 simulated qualification schedules, and then looked at some statistics from the aggregate results.
Code:
Team Avg Rnk Med Rnk Mod Rnk SD Rnk Min Rnk Max Rnk #1 seed Top 8 Avg SS Med SS Stdv SS Min SS Max SS 67 1.08 1 1 0.31 1 3 186 200 262.395 264 15.92 215 295 971 3.865 3 2 2.74 1 21 4 187 213.82 215.5 21.28 154 272 1718 3.78 3 2 2.52 1 20 6 192 213.31 214 21.19 150 262 525 6.355 5 4 4.63 1 28 1 158 194.85 196 22.56 133 252 1592 6.02 5 4 3.75 1 21 3 161 195.685 195 20.68 144 251 2619 13.9 11 8 8.84 2 51 0 60 165.165 167 23.51 97 225 910 13.265 12 11 7.80 2 39 0 56 167.045 167.5 21.86 112 232 16 13.725 12 8 7.75 2 44 0 61 165.42 165 22.15 111 224 1208 14.19 12 6 9.47 2 49 0 69 165.68 166 25.46 96 218 842 12.13 10 7 7.78 2 49 0 80 171.045 171 22.84 101 219 1551 12.27 10 10 7.42 2 38 0 62 170.62 172 23.18 117 246 1902 11.89 10 6 7.92 2 42 0 87 172.125 174 22.98 114 231 2771 22.74 20 24 12.60 3 65 0 19 143.79 144 24.95 76 210 177 22.695 20 15 11.32 3 60 0 12 143.585 145 22.55 87 200 308 23.47 23 24 12.00 5 73 0 17 142.775 142 24.00 75 199 226 23.945 22 18 11.89 3 57 0 13 141.57 142 23.83 94 207 294 21.89 19 14 12.19 5 70 0 21 146.135 146.5 24.48 70 198 1073 22.16 20 10 11.95 3 57 0 18 145.65 147 24.38 92 210 558 23.67 21.5 12 12.46 5 60 0 13 142.37 140 25.14 81 207 868 22.59 20 16 12.53 3 73 0 20 144.605 145 25.38 65 216 1922 24 22 22 13.32 4 74 0 18 142.145 141 25.90 67 203 2137 23.17 21 29 13.03 4 69 0 20 143.025 144 25.51 68 205 706 37.305 36 34 14.84 5 75 0 3 118.105 117.5 24.27 58 201 2415 35.535 34 28 15.12 8 80 0 2 120.67 122 24.05 54 183 343 37.31 37 32 15.05 8 73 0 1 117.75 117.5 24.03 60 176 3123 36.465 36 36 15.88 7 74 0 1 118.995 119 25.69 59 177 281 36.36 34.5 31 15.10 7 75 0 3 119.46 119.5 24.64 51 188 2377 37.175 37 42 15.27 7 73 0 3 117.84 116 24.86 64 180 1727 36.955 35 25 16.07 6 78 0 2 119.115 120 26.03 49 188 1868 36.58 37 40 14.68 6 72 0 1 119.27 117.5 23.22 66 190 93 35.78 34 30 16.12 4 82 0 3 120.565 121 25.81 52 208 1296 37.37 35 23 16.06 8 80 0 2 117.855 119 25.12 50 192 801 34.7 33.5 50 14.56 7 69 0 4 122.315 120 23.86 73 188 486 37.045 35 34 15.54 9 83 0 0 118.04 119 24.77 43 175 3161 35.85 35 18 14.76 7 68 0 5 120.64 120 24.33 75 185 11 35.73 34 27 15.97 5 83 0 2 120.255 121 25.81 45 200 151 36.21 34.5 30 15.64 7 80 0 3 120.05 119 24.88 64 175 337 36.62 36 36 16.21 6 85 0 3 119.075 118.5 26.60 36 187 3038 38.81 37 21 15.85 7 83 0 2 115.33 115 24.77 39 188 399 35.225 34 34 14.44 7 70 0 1 120.635 120 23.32 70 190 2614 37.055 35 24 15.63 6 75 0 3 118.145 121 24.98 56 187 20 34.26 32 24 14.87 6 74 0 4 123.185 123 24.17 63 189 772 36.45 35 39 16.36 4 78 0 3 119.75 119 25.73 61 200 102 36.66 35 22 15.79 5 74 0 4 119.395 119.5 25.73 60 193 829 37.57 35 26 14.88 9 72 0 0 117.195 118 23.07 60 174 2506 52.52 53 54 15.61 15 82 0 0 93.985 92.5 23.72 35 159 3125 52.73 53 72 16.04 8 85 0 1 93.88 92 24.70 32 175 2465 52.725 55.5 62 15.25 13 81 0 0 94.31 93 23.17 44 164 3238 51.525 53 58 15.64 13 84 0 0 95.99 95.5 23.55 34 163 585 52.89 55 57 14.78 9 83 0 0 93.795 92 21.94 47 173 612 53.615 55.5 59 14.73 15 83 0 0 92.345 91 22.02 37 161 2341 52.4 52.5 47 17.00 13 85 0 0 94.405 95 25.81 35 170 932 51.715 52 55 14.55 10 82 0 0 95.46 97 21.66 37 169 461 53.255 55 41 15.80 14 85 0 0 93.315 94 23.61 38 158 668 51.41 52 45 14.47 17 82 0 0 95.865 97 21.76 44 152 125 53.82 56 62 15.28 13 85 0 0 92.235 91 23.63 25 161 3168 51.98 54 61 16.69 16 84 0 0 95.15 94 25.62 38 160 2265 53.61 54 43 15.32 14 82 0 0 92.785 92 23.36 37 161 2638 50.765 50.5 50 16.11 14 83 0 0 96.675 96.5 24.48 45 155 178 52.46 53 49 15.21 14 85 0 0 94.24 94 22.86 33 155 1452 53.09 54 55 16.59 13 84 0 0 93.585 93 25.50 36 169 3176 53.265 53 62 15.43 18 85 0 0 93.495 95 23.47 35 154 2757 53.74 55 57 14.80 14 84 0 0 92.48 91 21.96 40 152 3231 66.525 70 73 13.16 13 85 0 0 71.95 68 22.27 27 158 533 67.62 71 85 13.70 13 86 0 0 70.125 68 23.67 19 162 647 66.255 68 65 13.40 24 86 0 0 71.77 72 22.65 19 143 2424 66.915 69.5 69 13.80 18 86 0 0 71.095 69 23.45 23 153 2164 67.065 70.5 78 13.88 23 86 0 0 70.25 70 23.52 17 143 3306 66.7 70 70 13.07 22 85 0 0 71.6 69 21.61 27 134 116 65.395 67 69 12.29 29 86 0 0 73.97 73 20.94 23 132 2023 67.015 69.5 80 13.15 28 86 0 0 71.065 70.5 22.26 29 125 2534 68.3 71 75 11.89 27 86 0 0 68.865 66 20.57 19 130 166 65.715 67 64 12.53 23 86 0 0 73.235 73 20.99 18 139 128 67.92 71 78 12.45 24 86 0 0 69.17 66 20.66 25 130 342 66.555 69 70 13.07 27 86 0 0 71.385 71 21.92 26 134 2102 67.79 70 83 13.01 15 86 0 0 69.73 68 21.75 28 150 2895 68.305 71.5 76 13.06 21 86 0 0 68.19 65.5 22.64 18 146 2914 66.625 68 72 13.01 28 85 0 0 71.545 71.5 22.12 19 133 117 76.04 78 84 8.66 44 86 0 0 53.3 53 18.73 11 109 3128 77.695 81 85 8.96 39 86 0 0 48.355 46.5 20.51 6 114 120 77.975 80 83 7.38 34 86 0 0 49.29 48 17.43 12 117 1311 77.5 81 86 8.89 44 86 0 0 48.855 46 20.14 6 107 2497 78.735 82 84 7.76 47 86 0 0 47.095 44.5 18.94 7 109 896 82.785 85 86 4.72 60 86 0 0 32.525 30 17.57 -2 84 2669 68.74 71.5 82 12.26 23 86 0 0 67.715 67 21.72 14 137 3083 67.495 71 79 13.98 22 86 0 0 70.075 68 23.70 21 142 |
|
#108
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Joe Ross, what order are those teams in? All I know is that it goes from generally higher seed to generally lower, but there are discrepancies. 2619 looks like it's in worse shape than 910, yet it is higher on the list.
Oh, and it'd be great for 67 to seed first! (too bad that never happens in Atlanta) |
|
#109
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hope this year goes like 2008 with the 16,67 that made it to Einstein!!!
|
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Thanks Joe, that really puts things into perspective. Having not played outside of Michigan since 2006 it is really hard to gauge teams from other areas.
|
|
#111
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Quote:
Looking forward to playing with you. |
|
#112
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Quote:
. It'll be our first time that we can afford it since '06, and we're all looking forward to having a great time there! |
|
#113
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Here is a little of what team 20 can do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSWy6OdkAEc Good luck! See you in Atlanta! |
|
#114
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Quote:
I know we've got some monster teams on Newton (and I say that with nothing but admiration), but we hope to hold our own against the big boys and really strut our stuff. ![]() |
|
#115
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Quote:
![]() |
|
#116
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Haha, 1718 and 1551, I assure you, people who you want noticing, have noticed. The teams at the top do their pre-scouting thoroughly.
|
|
#117
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Only a few more days till i get to see her again! This is sad you would think I was talking about a chick... no wonder me gf gets jealous. XD can't wait to see some of the best compete at Nats.!
|
|
#118
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Pre-scouting? What's that?
Our team had to notice when you beat us in the quals at MSC. There was even more noticing going on when your alliance racked up 20 and then 17 points in the quarterfinals against 27, 201, and 703. That is sick! Semis were so close. I think in the first match the scores were never more than a point away from each other. If it weren't for that 2 point penalty (don't carry the ball!) it would have been a tie game. |
|
#119
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
1718 and 1551, I feel your pain! We, too, think we have a fine machine this year and hope to get some attention in Atlanta. We did well in CT, and had we not had strange mishaps in two matches (once lost communication with the field, once had our kicker get stuck out, both now corrected) could well have been an alliance captain. We have a reliable autonomous mode (scoring 1-2 balls per match), scored 3-5 balls in teleop and can supply balls from midfield easily, and hung successfully (and quickly) in every attempt. We're looking forward to playing again now that our minor kinks have been worked out!
|
|
#120
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Newton Division 2010
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Newton Division | Collmandoman | Championship Event | 49 | 13-04-2005 15:03 |
| Newton Division | Alex Cormier | Championship Event | 22 | 05-04-2003 22:09 |
| Newton Division 2003 | Jon K. | Championship Event | 6 | 05-04-2003 15:28 |
| Newton Division | Chubtoad | Championship Event | 14 | 16-04-2002 22:24 |