Go to Post Is it weird we think speed controllers are sexy? - vivek16 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Swerve or Mecanum? Which does your team prefer?
Mecanum 26 24.53%
Swerve 49 46.23%
Neither, they are too complex and 4wd or 6wd will do the job 31 29.25%
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2010, 19:40
big1boom big1boom is offline
Chains=Fun
FRC #2022 (Titan Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Aurora
Posts: 267
big1boom is a glorious beacon of lightbig1boom is a glorious beacon of lightbig1boom is a glorious beacon of lightbig1boom is a glorious beacon of lightbig1boom is a glorious beacon of lightbig1boom is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

This year we built both drive systems.

During the build season we manufactured a coaxial swerve very similar to our drivetrain in 2009. This took most of the build season, and used up a significant amount of weight. (final robot weight of 120.0lbs) We had many problems with this drive at midwest due to major design flaws that would have been caught with preseason testing.

After Midwest, we took a step back to look at the options we had for 10000 lakes. Turns out, since the withholding allowance was upped to 65 pounds, we built an entirely new robot in 5 days. In those 5 days, we managed to build a fully functioning mecanum robot that had more functionality that out build season robot. We were actually able to get the entire robot built and wired in 3.5 days, with the rest devoted to driver practice and programming. With this 5 day build season we managed to built the most reliable robot our team has ever built.


So, now onto the pro's and con's
SWERVE
PRO:
Able to direct 100% of the force into the direction of travel
Not able to be pushed sideways

CON:
Very difficult to design
Multiple points of failure
Requires high quality sensor feedback
Heavy
Time intensive

MECANUM
PRO:
Very simple build
Reliable
Easy to program
Doesn't require sensors

CON:
Can be pushed easily
Not able to put 100% of force into any direction.

For an offseason project, I would say go ahead and try to build a functional swerve. It will be a great learning opportunity.

For build season though, I would recommend against doing a swerve without fairly successful offseason prototyping.


If you have any questions about either system, or about the specific failures we discovered, go ahead and ask.

EDIT: Woah this post got long quickly
__________________

Last edited by big1boom : 12-04-2010 at 19:43.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swerve Drive DuskProgrammer Programming 7 16-01-2010 09:29
Swerve vs. Mech? yoshibrock Technical Discussion 24 15-01-2010 13:34
Swerve drive 4, 2+2? kirtar Technical Discussion 18 02-04-2008 06:58
Swerve Drivetrain Pelicano234 Technical Discussion 18 13-05-2007 12:55
Swerve Drive Jeff Waegelin Technical Discussion 14 17-09-2001 08:06


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:20.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi