Go to Post the jocks may have muscle, but we have extruded aluminum :D - [527]phil [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Swerve or Mecanum? Which does your team prefer?
Mecanum 26 24.53%
Swerve 49 46.23%
Neither, they are too complex and 4wd or 6wd will do the job 31 29.25%
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #46   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 13:17
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,074
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajlapp View Post
This is the reason we wanted to introduce commercial swerve components to the market. There is always lots of discussion amongst the community about how to keep FIRST competitive....

I disagree with making the game easier or artificially leveling the playing field through other means.

I'd much rather see a large portion of teams building high quality robots by using off-the-shelf items when necessary to bolster an area of their team where they may not have the expertise.

That said, swerve is tough to pull off even if you start with pre-made transmissions. Cyber Blue is hosting a swerve discussion this week in Atlanta about the months they spent leading up to competition developing the technology.
The hard part is not the hardware. The devil is in the software. I admit, after 7 years of FRC and countless off season projects I am still intimidated by the thought of having to code a functional swerve drive during the build season.

Quote:
Originally Posted by joek View Post
but, most tank drives use only 2 drive motors, whereas omni and mechanum ALWAYS use 4, so there is pore power being delivered, despite the 30% decrease, we have mechanum, and were able to push around tank drives like it was notheing
What Tank Drive bots are you looking at? Ive seen some using 6 drive motors and most using 4.
__________________




.
  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 13:38
kevin.li.rit's Avatar
kevin.li.rit kevin.li.rit is offline
Imaginary Friend
AKA: Kevin Li
FRC #0596 (SciClones)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Hopkinton, Massachusetts
Posts: 936
kevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to kevin.li.rit
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joek View Post
but, most tank drives use only 2 drive motors, whereas omni and mechanum ALWAYS use 4, so there is pore power being delivered, despite the 30% decrease, we have mechanum, and were able to push around tank drives like it was notheing
While I haven't seen any first omni robots using less than 4 wheels. There are omni-wheeled robots with 3 wheels. In the past we've considered using a 3 wheel setup.
__________________
Kevin Li

596 - Sciclones
1405 - Finney Falcons
2262 - Holliston Panthers
  #48   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 14:55
Tom Line's Avatar
Tom Line Tom Line is offline
Raptors can't turn doorknobs.
FRC #1718 (The Fighting Pi)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Armada, Michigan
Posts: 2,537
Tom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thefro526 View Post
I thought a bit more on this Subject last night, and came to the realization that Swerve Drives are going to become more and more common in FRC.
I would tend to disagree. Full mechanical designs for swerves (or the pictures to allow you to easily reverse engineer them) have been around for years. I believe 217 posted a cutaway of their serve from 5 or more years ago. Those teams are more than willing to lend help to anyone who needs it as well.

However, you still see a lot of teams who have already DONE swerve not using them going forward. Nearly every big name team has done swerve several times, yet most do not pick it as their drivetrain of choice.

Why?

1. Complexity. Both mechanical and programmatically.

2. Advantage gained. I would put forward that last year and this year are two of the biggest swerve-advantaged games so far. Yet if you look at the top tier of teams in OPR, the proportion of swerve teams comes no where near 50%. Swerve has a huge number of trade offs, and the advantages are actually questionable nearly every year. You'd have a hard time telling me that 67, 469, and 1114's lack of swerve this year is hurting them. I bet the choice not to do swerve HELPED them in a big way during the build season - it was that much more time to work on their ball handling systems.

3. Cost. Whether you purchase a turnkey system like the 221 one, or whether you build your own, there is no small cost in engineering, materials, and machining.

I keep pointing out and I will continue to point out that Swerve is cool, but most teams that build it realize they'd rather be spending their time solving the game rather than solving a drivetrain, and a 6-wheeled or 8-wheeled drivetrain will perform nearly as well in most applications, and better in many.
  #49   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 15:49
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,766
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joek View Post
but, most tank drives use only 2 drive motors, whereas omni and mechanum ALWAYS use 4, so there is pore power being delivered, despite the 30% decrease, we have mechanum, and were able to push around tank drives like it was notheing
Very few respectable tank drives use only 2 motors, and very few use relatively low traction wheels like KoP wheels that your mecanum drive could push. I guess if they used the wheels in the KoP you could push them around, but that's hardly the level of competition you have to play defense against.

A mecanum drive is limited by traction faster than a tank drive, thus, it will have less "pushing power" in most situations.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
--2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
.
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
-- 2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design -- 2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
-- 2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
-- 2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 MN 10K Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
  #50   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 15:49
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,074
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
I would tend to disagree. Full mechanical designs for swerves (or the pictures to allow you to easily reverse engineer them) have been around for years. I believe 217 posted a cutaway of their serve from 5 or more years ago. Those teams are more than willing to lend help to anyone who needs it as well.

However, you still see a lot of teams who have already DONE swerve not using them going forward. Nearly every big name team has done swerve several times, yet most do not pick it as their drivetrain of choice.

Why?

1. Complexity. Both mechanical and programmatically.

2. Advantage gained. I would put forward that last year and this year are two of the biggest swerve-advantaged games so far. Yet if you look at the top tier of teams in OPR, the proportion of swerve teams comes no where near 50%. Swerve has a huge number of trade offs, and the advantages are actually questionable nearly every year. You'd have a hard time telling me that 67, 469, and 1114's lack of swerve this year is hurting them. I bet the choice not to do swerve HELPED them in a big way during the build season - it was that much more time to work on their ball handling systems.

3. Cost. Whether you purchase a turnkey system like the 221 one, or whether you build your own, there is no small cost in engineering, materials, and machining.

I keep pointing out and I will continue to point out that Swerve is cool, but most teams that build it realize they'd rather be spending their time solving the game rather than solving a drivetrain, and a 6-wheeled or 8-wheeled drivetrain will perform nearly as well in most applications, and better in many.

What is of most interest to me:

217: Swerved in 2003. Hasn't done it again. (Nonadrive is the closest they've come)
67: Swerved in 2005. Hasn't gone back. (This was a cool flop bot swerve though)
1114: Swerved in 2004. Hasn't gone back.
33: Swerved in 2005, switched to different drive train halfway through the season. Again in 2009: Maybe?
71: has been using swerve since 2005. (Of particular interest: Hasn't won a Championship since 2004)
111: even I don't know how long.
68: 2008,2009,2010. This year their swerve drive was too much of a technical undertaking for them.
148: Swerved in 2008. Hasn't gone back since.

So many veteran teams have tried swerve and gone back to traditional 6wd/8wd machines. 2009 was not a FULL swerve, only 2 wheels actuated as far as I can recall.

67, 6wd the last couple years. 8wd this year.
1114, 6wd. 8wd this year
33, 6wd.
217, 6wd (excepting this year)

I know correlation does not imply causation but I have a hunch that there is a reason why none of these teams have gone swerving again. It may be a cool thing, and definitely a design every team should have in their arsenal, but in most cases it is not the most efficient design.
__________________




.
  #51   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 15:56
thefro526's Avatar
thefro526 thefro526 is offline
Mentor for Hire.
AKA: Dustin Benedict
no team (EWCP, MAR, FRC 708)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,599
thefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to thefro526 Send a message via MSN to thefro526
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
*snip* I would tend to disagree. Full mechanical designs for swerves (or the pictures to allow you to easily reverse engineer them) have been around for years. I believe 217 posted a cutaway of their serve from 5 or more years ago. Those teams are more than willing to lend help to anyone who needs it as well.

However, you still see a lot of teams who have already DONE swerve not using them going forward. Nearly every big name team has done swerve several times, yet most do not pick it as their drivetrain of choice. *snip*
Even though full designs for swerves had been posted for years, most teams lacked the resources to build one. The same thing was true for Mecanum wheels until 2007. There were a few teams who made their own in 2005 and 2006 and posted designs and research on them, but most teams lacked the ability to make the wheels and chassis. Then, in 2007 AM came out with their own line of Mecanum wheels and a huge number of teams began using them. I think the same thing will happen with Swerve Drives in the next few years with the introduction of the Team 221 Swerve Modules.
__________________
-Dustin Benedict
2005-2012 - Student & Mentor FRC 816
2012-2014 - Technical Mentor, 2014 Drive Coach FRC 341
Current - Mentor FRC 2729, FRC 708
  #52   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 16:31
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,104
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
A mecanum drive is limited by traction faster than a tank drive, thus, it will have less "pushing power" in most situations.
Yes! In the pure forward and reverse directions, a mecanum wheel's pushing force is limited by traction, not by a vector reduction in the amount of available force.

Even if a mecanum wheel's rollers were made of the exact same material as a standard wheel of the same wheel diameter, the mecanum would lose traction before the standard wheel would.

This is because the reaction force of the floor (carpet) on the mecanum wheel's roller is larger than the reaction force on a standard wheel, given the same driving torque on the wheel.


~
  #53   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 16:37
Tom Line's Avatar
Tom Line Tom Line is offline
Raptors can't turn doorknobs.
FRC #1718 (The Fighting Pi)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Armada, Michigan
Posts: 2,537
Tom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond reputeTom Line has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
What is of most interest to me:

217: Swerved in 2003. Hasn't done it again. (Nonadrive is the closest they've come)
67: Swerved in 2005. Hasn't gone back. (This was a cool flop bot swerve though)
1114: Swerved in 2004. Hasn't gone back.
33: Swerved in 2005, switched to different drive train halfway through the season. Again in 2009: Maybe?
71: has been using swerve since 2005. (Of particular interest: Hasn't won a Championship since 2004)
111: even I don't know how long.
68: 2008,2009,2010. This year their swerve drive was too much of a technical undertaking for them.
148: Swerved in 2008. Hasn't gone back since.

So many veteran teams have tried swerve and gone back to traditional 6wd/8wd machines. 2009 was not a FULL swerve, only 2 wheels actuated as far as I can recall.

67, 6wd the last couple years. 8wd this year.
1114, 6wd. 8wd this year
33, 6wd.
217, 6wd (excepting this year)

I know correlation does not imply causation but I have a hunch that there is a reason why none of these teams have gone swerving again. It may be a cool thing, and definitely a design every team should have in their arsenal, but in most cases it is not the most efficient design.
One very slight correction. 67's 2008 overdrive bot actually had rear-wheel-only pseudo swerve. If you watch their matches that year, it will suddenly dawn on your how they can turn their corners so quickly.
  #54   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 16:38
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,766
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
One very slight correction. 67's 2008 overdrive bot actually had rear-wheel-only pseudo swerve. If you watch their matches that year, it will suddenly dawn on your how they can turn their corners so quickly.
IIRC from reading an old thread, the back wheels were unpowered, just turreted.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
--2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
.
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
-- 2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design -- 2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
-- 2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
-- 2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 MN 10K Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
  #55   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 16:40
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,074
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
One very slight correction. 67's 2008 overdrive bot actually had rear-wheel-only pseudo swerve. If you watch their matches that year, it will suddenly dawn on your how they can turn their corners so quickly.
Ah yes. I forgot that. This is outlined Here
__________________




.
  #56   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 20:17
joek's Avatar
joek joek is offline
Team Welder and CAD tech
FRC #2052 (KnightKrawler)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Irondale H.S.
Posts: 231
joek is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coffeeism View Post
While I haven't seen any first omni robots using less than 4 wheels. There are omni-wheeled robots with 3 wheels. In the past we've considered using a 3 wheel setup.
i was talking about true omni drive, the holonomic kind
__________________


2012 Record (13-2-0)
lake superior regional finalists- thank you WAVE (2826) and Blue Twilight (2220)
  #57   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 20:22
joek's Avatar
joek joek is offline
Team Welder and CAD tech
FRC #2052 (KnightKrawler)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Irondale H.S.
Posts: 231
joek is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
The hard part is not the hardware. The devil is in the software. I admit, after 7 years of FRC and countless off season projects I am still intimidated by the thought of having to code a functional swerve drive during the build season.



What Tank Drive bots are you looking at? Ive seen some using 6 drive motors and most using 4.
then they must be using Fisher Price motors to drive, because we're only allowed 5 cims
__________________


2012 Record (13-2-0)
lake superior regional finalists- thank you WAVE (2826) and Blue Twilight (2220)
  #58   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 20:35
=Martin=Taylor= =Martin=Taylor= is offline
run the trap!!!
FRC #0100 (The Wild Hat Society)
Team Role: Human Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Bezerkeley, California
Posts: 1,255
=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute=Martin=Taylor= has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
....
...I know correlation does not imply causation but I have a hunch that there is a reason why none of these teams have gone swerving again. It may be a cool thing, and definitely a design every team should have in their arsenal, but in most cases it is not the most efficient design.
Last time 111 didn't build a swerve they won both their regionals.

The same is true for 1625.

hmmmmm...
__________________
"Cooperation; because life is a team sport"
-Philip J. Fry
  #59   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 20:37
sdcantrell56's Avatar
sdcantrell56 sdcantrell56 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Sean
FRC #2415 (Wired Cats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,038
sdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond reputesdcantrell56 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joek View Post
then they must be using Fisher Price motors to drive, because we're only allowed 5 cims
We're using 8wd tank drive with 6 motors this year (4cims and 2 FP's)


Any team only using 2 cims in the drive this year is seriously hurting themselves
__________________

Mentor 2415
  #60   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 20:42
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is offline
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,833
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Wow! Did you ever get a lot of responses, quickly, on this one thread. You'd think you had posted a game hint for next year, or something!

But you asked two questions... one was:

"What should we build?"

and the other was "What does your team prefer?"

Those are two entirely different questions.

Frankly, I really don't think that the "What does your team prefer?" question is relevant to the choice that you have to make. First of all, very, VERY few teams or people posting here will have built and worked with BOTH mecanum and swerve drive systems. Many people will have SEEN both systems in action... and a few will have built and worked with both... but very few will be able to give you a first hand opinion on what they prefer.

What you need to consider is WHY you want to build a robot in the off season. Do you want to build it to work on design and machining skills? Do you want to improve programming skills? Do you just want to get first hand experience with at least one form of omni-directional drive? Do you want to have a cool demo robot? All of the above?

We have built a mecanum... but not a swerve. It was pretty easy to build... but took a bit of work to program (at least if you want 4 wheel PID speed control on an IFI control system... the cRio should make it a bit easier.) Unless you choose to build your own wheels, or develop a fancy suspension system, a mecanum drive is a very simple build challenge... particularly if you use a direct drive from either a Banebots or AM gearbox.

Outside of the discussions surrounding FRC competition robots... which are really kind of irrelevant to an off-season build project, the #1 advantage of a mecanum drive is that 99% of the people on this planet have no idea what a mecanum wheel is... and aside from a brief shot of a forklift on the recent Star Trek movie... have never seen one, either. Think about that... these wheels fit in a STAR TREK movie! Honestly, there is not much that is cooler from a teacher's viewpoint than watching a grade 10 explain to a P.Eng how your wheels work.

If you're looking for a bigger machining challenge, however, a swerve has all sorts of intricate parts that need to fit together just so. Sure, you can buy some COTS parts now to make that easier... but you are still working on a more mechanically complex system.

That is the reason we have avoided swerve up until now... we just don't have the manufacturing resources (mostly human resources... we've got the machines...) to confidently put together a good working swerve during build season. It would certainly be less daunting a task if we had built one as an off-season project.

But your team needs to think about why you want to build this thing... what you want it to be able to do... how much you want it to cost (in terms of money AND time invested in it) and then go with the machine that will make your team a better team.

Who knows... we might be back on regolith next year... maybe we'll have to climb stairs, or maybe the field will be made of corrugated iron. Or maybe wheels will be outlawed entirely.

Focus on the team, not the machine, and you can't go wrong.

Jason

Last edited by dtengineering : 13-04-2010 at 20:45.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swerve Drive DuskProgrammer Programming 7 16-01-2010 09:29
Swerve vs. Mech? yoshibrock Technical Discussion 24 15-01-2010 13:34
Swerve drive 4, 2+2? kirtar Technical Discussion 18 02-04-2008 06:58
Swerve Drivetrain Pelicano234 Technical Discussion 18 13-05-2007 12:55
Swerve Drive Jeff Waegelin Technical Discussion 14 17-09-2001 08:06


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:57.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi