|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Should Apple dump the G-Series and go with INTEL?
Quote:
1. Software vendors will have to re-compile their products for an Intel/AMD processor, which right after compiling their Apps for Mac OS X would anger developers even more. 2. Intel is still somewhat a CICS processor, which Motorola has always been a RICS processor. They would have to re-write a lot of drivers, system files, etc. to get right. This is more of an analyst dream than a actual dream. To the eyes of an analyst an Intel processor is cheaper and more readily available than a Motorola processor. The technical feats would be too much to bear. Plus * Even though Motorola processors only go at 1.25 GHz, they can still compete with even the latest 3.0 GHz due to its Velocity Engine. * The next generation of processors will most likly be a 64 bit IBM Power 4. (Kind of Ironic, but hey) Its a PowerPC compatible processor with a Velocity Engine. Right now it is used in Linux servers. All things fair I have also heard of a project called Marklar which is just in case the PowerPC fails to deliver it can be ported to X86. Also Darwin, the core of Mac OS X has been ported to an X86 for some time now. Don't be fooled with MHz, it is only a partial measurement of speed, there are many other factors that come into play. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|