Go to Post FIRST is like Starbucks coffee, it's addicting and you just can't seem to get away from it... - Beth Sweet [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Swerve or Mecanum? Which does your team prefer?
Mecanum 26 24.53%
Swerve 49 46.23%
Neither, they are too complex and 4wd or 6wd will do the job 31 29.25%
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2010, 20:50
PAR_WIG1350's Avatar
PAR_WIG1350 PAR_WIG1350 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alan Wells
FRC #1350 (Rambots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,190
PAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

The closest we've come to swerve was last year when our rear wheels were mounted on a small powered turret.
__________________
  #62   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-04-2010, 13:46
artdutra04's Avatar
artdutra04 artdutra04 is offline
VEX Robotics Engineer
AKA: Arthur Dutra IV; NERD #18
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,078
artdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
What is of most interest to me:

217: Swerved in 2003. Hasn't done it again. (Nonadrive is the closest they've come)
67: Swerved in 2005. Hasn't gone back. (This was a cool flop bot swerve though)
1114: Swerved in 2004. Hasn't gone back.
33: Swerved in 2005, switched to different drive train halfway through the season. Again in 2009: Maybe?
71: has been using swerve since 2005. (Of particular interest: Hasn't won a Championship since 2004)
111: even I don't know how long.
68: 2008,2009,2010. This year their swerve drive was too much of a technical undertaking for them.
148: Swerved in 2008. Hasn't gone back since.

So many veteran teams have tried swerve and gone back to traditional 6wd/8wd machines. 2009 was not a FULL swerve, only 2 wheels actuated as far as I can recall.

67, 6wd the last couple years. 8wd this year.
1114, 6wd. 8wd this year
33, 6wd.
217, 6wd (excepting this year)

I know correlation does not imply causation but I have a hunch that there is a reason why none of these teams have gone swerving again. It may be a cool thing, and definitely a design every team should have in their arsenal, but in most cases it is not the most efficient design.
I disagree. The first year 228 did swerve was the first year we won a regional.
__________________
Art Dutra IV
Robotics Engineer, VEX Robotics, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI)
Robowranglers Team 148 | GUS Robotics Team 228 (Alumni) | Rho Beta Epsilon (Alumni) | @arthurdutra

世上无难事,只怕有心人.
  #63   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-04-2010, 14:33
StuMac's Avatar
StuMac StuMac is offline
looking for a team
AKA: Stuart Macgregor
no team (no team)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 11
StuMac is a glorious beacon of lightStuMac is a glorious beacon of lightStuMac is a glorious beacon of lightStuMac is a glorious beacon of lightStuMac is a glorious beacon of lightStuMac is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via AIM to StuMac Send a message via MSN to StuMac
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by artdutra04 View Post
I disagree. The first year 228 did swerve was the first year we won a regional.
correlation != causation.

Just because your team won their first regional with a swerve design, doesn't mean that it's a good system. There are way to many variables that also have just as major effect on your regional win. The quality of drivers, your opponents, other mechanisms on your robot, the game itself, luck. There is simply too much room for other explanations.

That said, I've very little interest in swerve or mecanum drives. Sure, they're cool to prototype, but unless a team has many years of experience driving one (read: practicing with a swerve bot in the off-season), has the machine shop and hands to build it near perfectly, the coders to ensure it's working flawlessly, the pit crew to ensure it's maintained constantly, and a host of other things, I just don't see them as that great an asset. Sure the occasional team like 111 or 71 will make swerves work, but honestly, is it really worth the upkeep? Some may say yes. I say go with what's solid, can be easily maintained, can be easily adapted, and doesn't require two joysticks to control. And that, is a 4 wheel, 6 wheel, or 8 wheel drive. Let the creativeness show in how you play the rest of the game with your manipulator.
  #64   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-04-2010, 18:22
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,104
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by StuMac View Post
Let the creativeness show in how you play the rest of the game with your manipulator.
That's certainly one point of view, and perhaps held by many teams and individuals.

There is another valid point of view however, a point of view which puts less emphasis on the "game" and puts more focus on learning. There is so much math and physics and engineering to be learned and so much creativeness and discovery can result from striving to understand and build a swerve or mecanum drive. Torques and force vectors, vector addition, trigonometry, bevel gears, software algorithms (closed-loop position control for the steering, closed-loop speed control for the wheels, how to properly adjust each of the wheel speeds - and directions for swerve - to reduce scubbing and maximize efficiency), the list goes on and on. So even if you don't win the game, you may come out ahead :-)


~
  #65   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-04-2010, 19:06
sgreco's Avatar
sgreco sgreco is offline
Registered User
AKA: Steven Greco
FRC #2079
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Millis
Posts: 1,031
sgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond reputesgreco has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by artdutra04 View Post
I disagree. The first year 228 did swerve was the first year we won a regional.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I understood you locked your swerve modules in place and skidded in elims at WPI.


I did the math last year about swerve percentages, but there have been 4 teams to win the championships with a swerve. (111 twice). In total 42 teams have won nationals. That's 9 percent to win with swerve. People often question "more teams compete with drivetrains other than swerve, so the odds are swerve won't win as much" but in reality, the best teams win, or at least really good teams do. If swerve teams consistently dominated skid teams, it would reflect in the stats, and they don't reflect that.

I'm not saying swerve is bad, I'm just suggesting that the advantages it appears it have on paper aren't quite the same as on the field.

Last edited by sgreco : 16-04-2010 at 19:16.
  #66   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-04-2010, 23:22
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,074
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joek View Post
then they must be using Fisher Price motors to drive, because we're only allowed 5 cims
Yes, many teams use the FP through an AM planetary to mesh with a CIM motor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by artdutra04 View Post
I disagree. The first year 228 did swerve was the first year we won a regional.
There are exceptions, for some teams swerve works really REALLY well. Their drivers just get the hang of it.

Just to share a bit of a conversation I was having the other day, the problem with swerve drives is that the wheels are never in the direction you want to go. There is a slight delay. If the driver is aware of this and does not try to correct for it you will be fine. Otherwise you end up going in a bit of a circle. It takes some getting used to. Not a downside just a fact. If you decide to go with a swerve drive robot you need to build a practice bot so your driver can get the hang of it.
__________________




.
  #67   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2010, 08:50
ALTrammell818 ALTrammell818 is offline
Strategy Captain and Drive Coach
AKA: Aaron
FRC #0818 (Steel Armadillos)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 58
ALTrammell818 will become famous soon enoughALTrammell818 will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to ALTrammell818
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
No - at least not by our scouting methods. Mecanum robots are immediately removed from our defensive pic list, as are robots with slick wheels / omni wheels. A decently geared robot with traction wheels will have no problem moving a robot with slick/omni or mechanum out of their way and scoring.

Mechanum are a neat idea (as are omni wheels), but once you bring robot to robot contact into the equation, I'd much rather have robots with traction that won't get pushed out of the way easily.

Regarding any lag time with swerve modules: If you have it programmed correctly, your swerve modules should never have to turn more than 90 degrees from any given point. When you keep in mind that a tank drive has to "turn" before it drives forward, there really is no lag in a well-done swerve drive when compared to a tank drive. When you take into account acceleration time, there really isn't any lag in a swerve compared to a mechanum either.

You may want to note, however, that except for a few teams, most teams do NOT do swerve every year. Even teams that have done swerve, generally don't repeat it much. That's because it takes so much time, machining, programming etc to make it work well.

Swerve is that thing that every team has to try at least once. They try it, they may win a couple engineering awards with it: then most teams rarely do it again.
Have you not seen the number of Mecanum drive bots this year with unbelievable pushing power? Back in Detroit the only bot with more push than us was the Juggernauts.
__________________
  #68   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2010, 11:27
artdutra04's Avatar
artdutra04 artdutra04 is offline
VEX Robotics Engineer
AKA: Arthur Dutra IV; NERD #18
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,078
artdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgreco View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I understood you locked your swerve modules in place and skidded in elims at WPI.
That's an interesting and one hundred percent wrong rumor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StuMac View Post
correlation != causation.
Actually, in this case our swerve drive was the reason for our success. Our alliance had two strong offensive robots (230, 20) and we were the strong defensive robot in the opponent's home zone. Without a swerve drive, we would never have been able to defend two robots simultaneously by constantly strafing, out-maneuvering, and out-pushing them.
__________________
Art Dutra IV
Robotics Engineer, VEX Robotics, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI)
Robowranglers Team 148 | GUS Robotics Team 228 (Alumni) | Rho Beta Epsilon (Alumni) | @arthurdutra

世上无难事,只怕有心人.
  #69   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2010, 13:07
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,104
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
Regarding any lag time with swerve modules: If you have it programmed correctly, your swerve modules should never have to turn more than 90 degrees from any given point.
Hi Tom,

Is this true only for swerves with unlimited steering rotation, or is it also true for swerves with limited steering rotation?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
When you keep in mind that a tank drive has to "turn" before it drives forward,
Could you please explain what you meant by the above?


~
  #70   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2010, 19:14
buildmaster5000 buildmaster5000 is offline
Trying to program the swerve drive
AKA: Alex
FRC #2421 (Rolling Thunder Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: May 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 207
buildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud of
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

For us, the reason we wanted to build a swerve drive is that we had trouble with our 6wd drop center wheel this year, so we wanted something that would offer more mobility without suffering in traction. We also had considered getting the 221 modules at the beginning of the year, but decided that our ONE programmer was going to be busy enough so we would wait for the offseason. I am personally more and more convinced that we should do swerve, and that we should be able to mount our modules on the bottom of our frame from this year after we take the kit wheel brackets off. It is interesting how different teams use swerve then never use it agian, but I agree with whoever said that driver practice, and lots of it, is how to get comfortable, and therefore good, with swerve.
__________________
-Alex



2010 Washington DC Regional: Engineering Excellence Award
  #71   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2010, 21:18
steelerborn's Avatar
steelerborn steelerborn is offline
Engineer at JBT FoodTech
AKA: Jonathan Stokes
FRC #5817 (Uni-Rex)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Clovis
Posts: 288
steelerborn has a brilliant futuresteelerborn has a brilliant futuresteelerborn has a brilliant futuresteelerborn has a brilliant futuresteelerborn has a brilliant futuresteelerborn has a brilliant futuresteelerborn has a brilliant futuresteelerborn has a brilliant futuresteelerborn has a brilliant futuresteelerborn has a brilliant futuresteelerborn has a brilliant future
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

I really like the swerve drives over mecanum drives.
I am working on a cad of an offseason swerve system right now.
It should be posted soon.
  #72   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2010, 21:43
buildmaster5000 buildmaster5000 is offline
Trying to program the swerve drive
AKA: Alex
FRC #2421 (Rolling Thunder Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: May 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 207
buildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud ofbuildmaster5000 has much to be proud of
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by steelerborn View Post
I am working on a cad of an offseason swerve system right now.
It should be posted soon.
If you could PM me when its up, that would be great!! We have been stuck with the 221 modules because we lack the resources to design one ourselves
__________________
-Alex



2010 Washington DC Regional: Engineering Excellence Award
  #73   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2010, 23:33
ADHDassassin's Avatar
ADHDassassin ADHDassassin is offline
Registered User
FRC #1477 (Texas Torque)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 13
ADHDassassin is a jewel in the roughADHDassassin is a jewel in the roughADHDassassin is a jewel in the rough
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by =Martin=Taylor= View Post
In my six years of competing in FIRST I don't remember a single mecanum robot ever dominating a competition.
.
I'm not exactly sure how my team did this year but we dominated FIRST Overdrive in 2008 with a mecanum robot, before FIRST Nationals we had a 30-1-0 record and two regional victories. It was an incredible design for turning around that track as we could essentially rotate around are front left wheel to make incredibly sharp turns. It also helped that we had a driver that also flew RC planes at a national level.

I understand that Lone Star and Bayou are considered to be "easier" regionals but we controlled that competition from our very first match. At nationals we had some code and design issues that prevented us from success... We gave in to the temptation to fix something that was already working.


But overall I love the mecanum drive train and watching one work is a beautiful demonstration of force vectors
__________________
  #74   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-04-2010, 11:19
TEE's Avatar
TEE TEE is offline
Registered User
FRC #0201
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 94
TEE has a spectacular aura aboutTEE has a spectacular aura aboutTEE has a spectacular aura about
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdcantrell56 View Post
We're using 8wd tank drive with 6 motors this year (4cims and 2 FP's)


Any team only using 2 cims in the drive this year is seriously hurting themselves
This year, we had a tank drive with 2 omni's in the back, so the robot would turn around its front (where the ball is), and we only used 2 cims. We could have added two more, but two seemed to be working fine; we could push well, and we could move around okay. We didn't end up adding two more because of the added weight (which would slow our hanging down).
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swerve Drive DuskProgrammer Programming 7 16-01-2010 09:29
Swerve vs. Mech? yoshibrock Technical Discussion 24 15-01-2010 13:34
Swerve drive 4, 2+2? kirtar Technical Discussion 18 02-04-2008 06:58
Swerve Drivetrain Pelicano234 Technical Discussion 18 13-05-2007 12:55
Swerve Drive Jeff Waegelin Technical Discussion 14 17-09-2001 08:06


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:57.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi