Go to Post I love first because of the late nights, the unparralleled stress, the excitement, the emotion. Because of the close defeats, the close victories. Because of the pride, the sense of accomplishment, the feeling of embettering the world. But most of all, because of you, the other teams. - Keith Chester [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Swerve or Mecanum? Which does your team prefer?
Mecanum 26 24.53%
Swerve 49 46.23%
Neither, they are too complex and 4wd or 6wd will do the job 31 29.25%
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-04-2010, 08:50
ALTrammell818 ALTrammell818 is offline
Strategy Captain and Drive Coach
AKA: Aaron
FRC #0818 (Steel Armadillos)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 58
ALTrammell818 will become famous soon enoughALTrammell818 will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to ALTrammell818
Re: Mecanum or Swerve?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
No - at least not by our scouting methods. Mecanum robots are immediately removed from our defensive pic list, as are robots with slick wheels / omni wheels. A decently geared robot with traction wheels will have no problem moving a robot with slick/omni or mechanum out of their way and scoring.

Mechanum are a neat idea (as are omni wheels), but once you bring robot to robot contact into the equation, I'd much rather have robots with traction that won't get pushed out of the way easily.

Regarding any lag time with swerve modules: If you have it programmed correctly, your swerve modules should never have to turn more than 90 degrees from any given point. When you keep in mind that a tank drive has to "turn" before it drives forward, there really is no lag in a well-done swerve drive when compared to a tank drive. When you take into account acceleration time, there really isn't any lag in a swerve compared to a mechanum either.

You may want to note, however, that except for a few teams, most teams do NOT do swerve every year. Even teams that have done swerve, generally don't repeat it much. That's because it takes so much time, machining, programming etc to make it work well.

Swerve is that thing that every team has to try at least once. They try it, they may win a couple engineering awards with it: then most teams rarely do it again.
Have you not seen the number of Mecanum drive bots this year with unbelievable pushing power? Back in Detroit the only bot with more push than us was the Juggernauts.
__________________
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swerve Drive DuskProgrammer Programming 7 16-01-2010 09:29
Swerve vs. Mech? yoshibrock Technical Discussion 24 15-01-2010 13:34
Swerve drive 4, 2+2? kirtar Technical Discussion 18 02-04-2008 06:58
Swerve Drivetrain Pelicano234 Technical Discussion 18 13-05-2007 12:55
Swerve Drive Jeff Waegelin Technical Discussion 14 17-09-2001 08:06


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi