Go to Post Thanks to team 1114 and 1503 for not wiping the floor with us. - SpaceBoy2000 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 00:04
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aren_Hill View Post
I still havent found what was wrong with allowing teams to use bumpers if they wanted too, all it is is another design tradeoff.

Save weight on a weaker frame and use bumpers?
Beef up the frame a bit to take the hits in exchange for more frame perimeter freedom

Its like the GDC directly saying "we dont trust your structual skills, so put these on"

I'll take responsibility for keeping my own robot alive thank you very much.
Well, part of it is that bumpers protect both teams. In (a practice match) 2007, a team without bumpers drove onto our bumpers and broke our radio. I don't think this would have happend if they had bumpers. This may have been a freak thing, but their lack of bumper hurt our robot. So, you may take responsibility for protecting your robot, but you also have to take responsibility for protection the other teams that did choose to have bumpers (this includes make sure they don't get ripped).

I've been in FIRST since 2006 and each of our robots have been alteast 75% of the peraminter have been covered in bumpers. So, I don't know what it was like not having bumpers. What are the advantages to not having bumpers?
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 00:17
Jack Jones Jack Jones is offline
Retired
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 964
Jack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

Put four of these in the kit!
__________________
This message is hidden because Jack Jones is on your ignore list.
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 00:23
Aren_Hill's Avatar
Aren_Hill Aren_Hill is offline
Build Nifty Things
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Menlo Park CA
Posts: 1,218
Aren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by XaulZan11 View Post
Well, part of it is that bumpers protect both teams. In (a practice match) 2007, a team without bumpers drove onto our bumpers and broke our radio. I don't think this would have happend if they had bumpers. This may have been a freak thing, but their lack of bumper hurt our robot. So, you may take responsibility for protecting your robot, but you also have to take responsibility for protection the other teams that did choose to have bumpers (this includes make sure they don't get ripped).
This was one of the earlier things under the "sharp edges" check
having bumpers shouldn't mean your off the hook for people finding ways around them accidentally.

Quote:
Originally Posted by XaulZan11 View Post
What are the advantages to not having bumpers?
alot slimmer profile, much higher ability to build your robot in a unique fashion.
If bumpers became optional chances are you may see 1625 with them, we just like being able to use them flexibly.

Our 2006 had bumpers on the right left and back sides, and none on the front, plus about 6" back on both sides. The ability to do that gave us a Full front pickup that rivaled 111's and they were a wide oriented robot.

In 2009 we immediately went for a wide robot partially due to the 6" minimum mandated on every corner. Going skinny would give us a very very small pickup compared to what we wanted.

If you noticed many many other teams did this and robots slowly began to look more and more similar...

I'm a fan of the 05 and earlier robots, they just look so much more athletic and awesome.
__________________
A guy who likes robots.
1625->3928->148->1296->971 oh dear
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 01:08
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,642
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aren_Hill View Post
I'll take responsibility for keeping my own robot alive thank you very much.
But will you take responsibility to keep the bumperless rookie bots you play against alive?
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 01:09
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,074
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery View Post
But will you take responsibility to keep the bumperless rookie bots you play against alive?
The ones that use the KOP frame. The old IFI ones were pretty much indestructible in my experience.
__________________




.
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 01:12
Aren_Hill's Avatar
Aren_Hill Aren_Hill is offline
Build Nifty Things
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Menlo Park CA
Posts: 1,218
Aren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

I forget what year it was rookies were deemed incapable of making a robot with any level of ability.

And having a rougher interaction helps teach not only robust construction, but designing for ease of maintenance and replacement.
__________________
A guy who likes robots.
1625->3928->148->1296->971 oh dear
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 01:19
Ian Curtis Ian Curtis is offline
Best Available Data
FRC #1778 (Chill Out!)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 2,521
Ian Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

I also don't have much of a problem with bumper rules. On the other hand, I had the "pleasure" of being knocked out of eliminations in 2007 and 2008 as a result of those flags, so I'm glad to see that they are gone.

While it was nice to be able to identify alliances with the bumpers, I think it did mess with the team identities a bit. Then again, this game lent itself to boxy, short robots. I think with a game with taller robots (e.g. 2009 or 2006) teams would have lots of space to display their usual colors/logo/etc, and the lack of personalized bumpers would be less noticeable.
__________________
CHILL OUT! | Aero Stability & Control Engineer
Adam Savage's Obsessions (TED Talk) (Part 2)
It is much easier to call someone else a genius than admit to yourself that you are lazy. - Dave Gingery
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 01:22
George A.'s Avatar
George A. George A. is offline
I come through in a spinsch
AKA: George- The Voice
FRC #0303 (TEST Team)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,000
George A. has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge A. has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge A. has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge A. has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge A. has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge A. has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge A. has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge A. has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge A. has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge A. has a reputation beyond reputeGeorge A. has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to George A.
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

What if, in conjunction to Billfred's idea we make it so each corner of the bumper has to be a certain color. If we make it so that each side has to have 3"-4" of alliance coloring then it would be a solid 6"-8" on each corner. More than enough to denote who is on which alliance. Then the middle would be free to be decorated as teams saw fit.

Or (assuming that most robots are a 4 sided polygon...148 from 2008 and 1501 from 2010 would be an exception not the rule) we have opposing sides be colored for alliances, with the other two allowed for team decoration.
__________________
My Volunteer Resumé
Game Announcer NJ: 2005-Present
Game Announcer Philly: 2006-Present
Game Announcer NY: 2005-2008
Game Announcer Champsionships: 2005-2008


  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 01:42
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,817
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

If I was in charge of the bumper rules:

Section 8.Y BUMPERS.
<RXX> Bumpers are at the team's discretion. Only standard bumpers, as defined in <RXY>, are exempt from size/weight requirements for the entire robot. NOTE: While bumpers are not required, they are highly recommended. Teams that choose not to use bumpers may find their robots taking a lot of structural damage.

<RXY> Standard design is defined as:
a) 2 vertically stacked 2.5" pool noodles, or [reasonable substitute that is 5" high],
b) 3/4" thick by 5" high plywood backing for the noodles,
c) Cover made of tough, smooth fabric that covers the noodles and the top and bottom of the plywood backing.
d) Optional: angled aluminum may be used to help secure the bumper covers.
All components must be assembled as shown in Figure 8-Z.

<RCD> All bumper segments used must be at least 6" in length. A section of bumper is not a segment unless it has all of the required components.

<RXZ> Standard bumpers must be entirely within the BUMPER ZONE and securely attached to the FRAME PERIMETER.

<RBA> Standard bumpers should be removable by one person in about 10 minutes.

<RZX> Non-standard bumpers are allowed, but must fit within normal robot size and weight requirements.
a) The outer material should be soft enough that a normal human could punch it and not suffer serious damage, but stiff enough that said normal human can not drive the material into the backing.
b) Should the bumpers have anything capable of motion inside them, the inspectors will notify the referees. Use of the bumpers to tip other robots will result in being reinspected after the motion is removed, in addition to any on-field penalty.

<RAB> Numbers/decorations/colors on bumpers. Should a team use bumpers, they are required to have their number, sized according to <Rnumberrule>, upon at least one segment, in a contrasting color to the rest of the bumper. Other than that, there are no restrictions on color.

Other rules referenced:

FRAME PERIMETER: The polygon defined by the outermost vertices of the robot in the bumper zone, not counting bolts. As an example, imagine putting a rubber band around your frame in the bumper zone--the band defines the perimeter. [note: bolt exclusion would extend up and down--no tolerance for outside the size box, but inside, tolerance up to the thickness of the plywood.]

<Rnumberrule> Numbers shall be X" high by Y" stroke, in a contrasting color to the background, spaced at about 90 degrees from each other. Numbers shall be visible against a black background from 300'. NOTE: This means that if your robot is in front of a black background, and you can't see the numbers from 300' away, you're in violation of the rule.

[author note: 300' has been the guideline for a number of years. Black on clear contrasts, but darned if I can see it from 300' away on a dark background...]

Now, to solve the alliance ID issues:

KOP item: 4 color-changing LED strips.
<Rcolor> You must use all 4 provided LED strips, and the color must be visible from X feet away on all sides. Your base code will take care of changing the color. (Base code would include a call to find out the alliance and produce a red or a blue.)

Of course, I am not in charge of any rules, so this is just what I'd like to see.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 06:43
yoda92 yoda92 is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Cupertino
Posts: 18
yoda92 is just really niceyoda92 is just really niceyoda92 is just really niceyoda92 is just really nice
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

i've been the bumper maker for the past 3 seasons on my team, not only do i miss the personalization aspect, but the 2 color thing is just a pain. I made the mistake of making the colors switchable by flipping the fabric, but it was a slow and unreliable process. It actually took me 3 days to sew it all too!!!
I could have easily done one of the "skirts", but i foresaw ripping and snagging on other robots (which happened).
While its easy for me to find the materials in balmy California, my largest complaint is the color compliance (bring back the flags) and the frame perimeter. The first FIRST team that can send me a picture of legal bumpers with broken plywood because of another robot (again with standard bumpers) crashed into it will make me have a heart attack from suprise
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 07:30
ttldomination's Avatar
ttldomination ttldomination is offline
Sunny
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Roanoke, TX
Posts: 2,066
ttldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

Frankly, I liked switching bumper colors for the alliance. It tended to be a pain, it really helped on the field, and off the field to see who's who. But similar bumpers (red & blue) tend to make all of the robots looks the same.

And I can just blame that on this year's game. I think that no matter if in '09, every team was using the same bumpers, each robot would definitely have looked different.

Regardless of what the rules will be, I still found a little interesting when a team at P'tree asked the ref if they would provided a second set of bumpers. Needless to say, I could see them frantically trying to locate some more pool noodles.

- Sunny
__________________
1261: 2007-2012
1648: 2013-2014
5283: 2015
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 08:41
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,712
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

Bumper zones signify contact zones. To me, it seems logical to force contact within the same zone on every robot so as to prevent teams from making contact zones as low as possible and thus tipping other robots.

There's also some math Dave did a while back, and the result is that a ~10fps 150lb robot can exert 10,000 psi of force onto an external object if the contact area is small enough. Thus, in the interest of keeping the fields and field components in tip top shape, bumpers are very necessary.

So Aren, I do trust you to keep your own robot in good health. Yet that doesn't mean your drivers will make decisions that are in the interest of all parties involved. (And by "your" I mean the overall FRC community of teams, not 1625.)

All I hope for moving forward is that we keep the bumpers. It keeps our robot prettier for the offseason.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub

Last edited by JesseK : 22-04-2010 at 08:53.
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 09:21
thefro526's Avatar
thefro526 thefro526 is offline
Mentor for Hire.
AKA: Dustin Benedict
no team (EWCP, MAR, FRC 708)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,599
thefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to thefro526 Send a message via MSN to thefro526
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

I'd like to see FIRST go back to bumper quantity rules like 2008.

I believe in 2008 something like 75% of your robots perimeter had to be covered by bumpers. This was a good trade off between function and protection and some teams used it to their advantage

Also, I never want to see a 10"-16" bumper zone again, EVER. I understand that having bumpers that high was the only way to make bump crossing work, but the side effects of this were just too much. It seemed like every other match some random defender would be pushing a machine up on one side of their drive and holding them there which was far less likely to happen with the lower bumper zone of 2008 and 2009.

As far as "Mandatory" bumpers go, I'm torn on the subject. There's part of me that doesn't like anything to be Mandatory, but at the same time I feel that bumpers make robots look better in most cases.

One thing I'd love to see added to bumper rules is a specific and required supplier for bumper fabric. Most teams use fabrics from the same vendors, but occasionally you'll see a machine with some random fabric that looks like crap and is clearly different that the standard fabric.

Red and Blue bumper colors were a cool idea, but I don't want to see it happen again. For as long as I've been watching FRC competitions I've never had a problem figuring out which team was on which alliance, but I can see how this could be a problem. Personally, I'm a huge fan of the old school rotating light from 2002-ish for differentiating alliances. I'm sure someone could track down a similar and more modern replacement for this.

I'd like to see bumper decoration restrictions go back to their 2008 and 2009 standards. We decorated our bumpers in both 2008 and 2009 and I think they looked great and we got a lot of compliments on them. I don't see why we shouldn't be able to do this now.
__________________
-Dustin Benedict
2005-2012 - Student & Mentor FRC 816
2012-2014 - Technical Mentor, 2014 Drive Coach FRC 341
Current - Mentor FRC 2729, FRC 708
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 09:31
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,976
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billfred View Post
I'll break the topic into three questions:

1) Where can the materials used in the construction of bumpers be improved? Is there something other than plywood, fabric, and pool noodles that is more robust, cheaper, or more readily available during build season?

2) Where can the rules on mounting bumpers be adjusted to simplify design frustrations without compromising the bumpers' effectiveness?

3) Where can the rules on visual content (colors, numbers, etc.) be adjusted for ease of implementation and visual effectiveness?
I personally do not like that bumpers are mandatory, but that being said I'll assume that they will continue to be and answer accordingly.

1) I'd like to see the backing material rules relaxed. Allow people to use what they wish for the backing material and rigidly enforce bumpers staying in the bumper zone. Thus if the bumper breaks and droops then penalties will accrue.

I'd also like to see the 'soft' section materials include other options such as 2" memory foam.

2) Mounting should be the option of the teams, but should be required to be robust. Again, if it fails then teams should be penalized and not allowed to return to the field until it is robust enough to withstand 'vigorous' robot-to-robot interaction.

3) The rules for this year made most robots look alike, which is boring to the casual observer. While the alliance color is a good idea, I'd rather see 2 sets of LED string lights controlled by a spike signifying alliance color. I loved seeing the different bumper colors and the unique look some teams had prior to this year.


Again, if I had my way bumpers (and their additional weight) would be optional.
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 09:41
Tom Bishop's Avatar
Tom Bishop Tom Bishop is offline
Registered User
FRC #0832 (Oscar)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Roswell, Ga
Posts: 124
Tom Bishop has a brilliant futureTom Bishop has a brilliant futureTom Bishop has a brilliant futureTom Bishop has a brilliant futureTom Bishop has a brilliant futureTom Bishop has a brilliant futureTom Bishop has a brilliant futureTom Bishop has a brilliant futureTom Bishop has a brilliant futureTom Bishop has a brilliant futureTom Bishop has a brilliant future
Re: Brainstorm: Improving the FRC bumper rules

We've never had much problems with the bumpers in past years. We always used them, with the exception of 2007 when we took off the side bumpers to facilitate getting on ramp bots. While I'm not a particularity a big fan of bumpers, I do see that they save where and tear on robots, and especially the field elements. And I thought that the bumpers this year made the alliances readily identifiable, and that's a good thing.

Our frames for the last 2 years have been held together with bolts, spacers and standoffs. the bolt caps extend about 3/16" outside the frame, but well within the box. Last year they where within the bumper zone and therefore allowed, since the bumper zone was low on the robot where the drive train was located. Inspectors where not real sticky on bolt heads behind the bumpers.

This year the bumper zone was 10" to 16" above ground level and therefore above the drive train area, so we had to add lexan spacers on our bot to cover those bolt caps, needlessly adding weight to a robot that already had weight issues. It's these spacers that I really dislike.

When the bumpers start to dictate the design of robots, I start to have problems with them. Having a "zero tolerance" for bolt heads protruding outside of the bumper zone, even when they are well within the box seems petty and useless, a "lawyers" interpretation of the rules; and we have in the past been admonished tor "lawyering" the rules.

It is my hoe that next year the GDC relaxes these rules a little, thereby giving inspectors some leeway for bolt heads and other minor protrusions. A more sensible and common sense approach is indicated.

I rest my case
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bumper Rules? Carter12s Rules/Strategy 4 21-02-2010 09:06
The Bumper Rules Cyberphil Rules/Strategy 5 07-01-2009 13:45
Bumper Rules Bochek Technical Discussion 7 10-02-2008 23:48
Bumper rules robotraj111 Kit & Additional Hardware 1 19-02-2006 20:36


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:42.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi