Go to Post I hate that every year people turn this competition into whining rather than winning. - Akash Rastogi [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Championship Event
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-04-2010, 11:15
PerpetualMotion PerpetualMotion is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 23
PerpetualMotion is a glorious beacon of lightPerpetualMotion is a glorious beacon of lightPerpetualMotion is a glorious beacon of lightPerpetualMotion is a glorious beacon of lightPerpetualMotion is a glorious beacon of lightPerpetualMotion is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Einstein Finals: Curie (469, 1114, 2041) vs. Newton (67, 177, 294)

I don't think anyone can argue that it was 1114/469's championships to lose. They were favorites going into the weekend, and rolled through just about every alliance they saw in elims without much trouble.

And thats exactly what happened, the Curie alliance lost it. I don't mean to take anything away from the Newton alliance, because even with the Curie alliances failures, it still takes an awesome alliance to beat them.

I think the strategy the Curie alliance used was the right one. Once they have 6 balls in their system, no alliance should be more efficient then 469 at getting the balls in the goal, so let the Newton alliance do what they wanted with the balls they had. Would having an extra ball or two in the system be better? Absolutely, but it probably wasn't worth the effort.

From the first video, it is clear that 469 wasn't hitting the shots they usually make. As a result, 469's efficiency was less than 67 + 177 so surprise surprise, the Newton alliance was able to out score them, barely.

The second match 2041 was stuck in a goal for over half a match. The Curie alliance came within 3 pts of tieing the match which just shows how dominant the Curie strategy is when it worked for 55 seconds. Had 1114 got 2041 out of the goal 15 seconds earlier, it could have been a very different match. Add in the fact that 469 sat in the tower and did nothing for at least 30 seconds when they had no balls in the system. 469 could have got out of the tower and slowed down 67 or even got a ball or two out of their system. Even more, 2041 blocked a 469 shot toward the end of the match. 1114 looked very slow as they went to hang, which leads me to believe they had a bad battery. Had 2041 not blocked the goal, and 1114 had hung, we suddenly have a tie game.

The second final match was ridiculously close given all the challenges the Curie alliance saw. Had that match been a tie or a win for the Curie alliance, I think it would have been very interesting to see the next match or two.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thanks and Congrats 1114, 469, 2041 Al Skierkiewicz Thanks and/or Congrats 9 19-04-2010 22:08
Congratulations to 294, 67, and 177! Chris is me Thanks and/or Congrats 20 19-04-2010 00:01
1114 vs. 469 ISITME_YESITIS Regional Competitions 31 02-04-2010 14:43
Thank you 1507, 177 & NEWTON division! Rob Thanks and/or Congrats 7 27-04-2009 18:33
[TBA]: Parsing Newton, Curie Greg Marra The Blue Alliance 9 20-04-2009 14:22


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:12.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi