|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Statistics on top 20 teams?
Programming:
Robot Design:
The Driver Station
Any techniques that you feel might be beneficial to others in the future?: Secure the CAN bus cables. During one match a stray wire or hose depressed a tap allowing the cable to come out. Also, during the Newton finals we had watchdog errors most likely because a CAN bus cable (still secured by its tab) had come out slightly. Quote:
Last edited by RobertG : 28-04-2010 at 20:32. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Statistics on top 20 teams?
Well, I'm looking for trends. What do many of these teams have in common? Essentially, if there are common characteristics for these top teams, then this is something that others might like to know to improve for future competitions.
For instance, I was not aware of the whole mechanum wheel thing. Seeing that only 1-2 teams have ever made it to the finals with mechanum wheels should give a robot design team some cause for pause. It's not that a superior design won't prevail, but perhaps starting out with mechanum may not be a good idea when facing a challenge like Breakaway. We've been getting some great responses so far. I'm on the road at the moment. So, when I get back home, I'll start collating the data and get some preliminary information back to the group. Thanks and keep the data coming! Mike |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Statistics on top 20 teams?
Here are the drivetrain trends. I see a trend for skid steers. I left blank information that I either didn't know or couldn't find.
2010 67 – 8 WD long 177 – 8 WD long (articulated is sets of two, front and back) 294 - 6WD long 2009 67 - 6WD wide 111 - 4 wheel crab (non-coaxial), wide 971 - 6WD wide 2008 1114 - 6WD long 217 - 6WD long 148 - three-wheeled crab (coaxial), nonagon-shaped robot 2007 177 - 6WD long 987 - 6WD long 190 - 6WD long 2006 217 - 6WD long 522 - Treads, long 296 - 2WD long, Omnis in front 2005 67 - three-wheeled crab (non-coaxial). Flop bot. 330 - 6WD long 503 – 4WD long, omniwheels in rear 2004 71 - 4WD long 494 - 4WD long 435 - 2WD long, with casters in front 2003 111 - Four-wheeled non-coaxial crab (with dropdown skid for turning) 469 – 4WD Long 65 - 4WD Wide 2002 71 - 4WD flop bot with casters in front 173 - 4WD long 66 – 4WD long 2001 71 - ? 294 - ? 125 - ? 365 - ? 279 - ? 2000 255 - ? 232 - ? 25 - ? 1999 176 - 4WD long w/ Omnis in front 1 - tank treads, long 48 – 4WD, long 1998 45 – 4WD long with Omnis in front. 1997 71 - ? 1996 73 - ? 1995 100 - ? 1994 144 - ? 1993 148 - ? 1992 126 - ? (I just compiled the information from this thread http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=77412) Last edited by sgreco : 29-04-2010 at 14:52. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Statistics on top 20 teams?
2001
71 - ? 294 - 4WD-long. And still functioning today! :-D 125 - ? 365 - ? 279 - ? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Statistics on top 20 teams?
Programming:
What language did they use? C++ Did they do something in autonomous? If so, what worked? 1: Start far, kick 3 (no bounce) 2: Start far, kick 3 (with bounce) 3: Start far, kick 3 (no bounce), go over bump 4: Start far, kick 3 (with bounce), go over bump 5: Start mid, kick 2 6: Start mid, kick 2, back up, turn toward center 7: Start near, kick 1 8: Start near, plow into net 9: Start near, kick 1, back up, pause 5 sec, move forward, kick anything in path In all modes we used current sensing to detect the ball and set the maximum distance. This was enormously helpful as we could easily adjust the starting position of the robot and distance from the ball without having to worry. We used mode 1 and 3 the most. CAN or PWM control? CAN. We had some trouble with the tan jaguars losing their identity, but fixed those with a patch. It definitely cleans up wiring, but you MUST ensure the wires are secure. If you lose 1, you lose them all! This is why we didn't move in the 2nd match of Newton finals. We're talking about using PWM for drive and CAN for auxiliary for next year. Did you use the Classmate for programming your robot or student/school supplied computers? The team recently purchased a dedicated programming laptop. Robot Design: What sensors were used? Jaguar current sensing for the intake roller, encoders on left and right drive train, encoder for kicker winch system, 2 limit switches for kicker zero and kicker max. Did you use the vision system? Yes! - but not the way you would think. We mounted our camera below our bumper so we could see behind those pesky bumps. It was especially helpful in the far end of the field. It also helped us see directly below the drivers station. What drive system? 6WD with a 0.100" lowered center wheel. The center wheel was driven directly and the front/back by a single loop of chain. Wheels? 7" traction wheels - Thank you Northrop Grumman! How many motors? Drive: 4 CIMs Intake: 1 CIM Kicker winch: 2 FP Pneumatics: 2 for 2 speed transmission, 1 for ratchet release What material was used for the frame (Aluminum, steel, unobtanium)? Welded aluminum. Mostly 1/16" wall, but 1/8" where we needed it. How did they control the ball? Pincher design with friction clutch and center back stop. We pulled balls away from many teams - including 1114 and 1902. Energy storage for kicker (elastic, pneumatic, motor driven, etc.)? flat elastic pulled back by winch and released by ratchet. How did you cut your parts (water jet, LASER, mill, hand tools,etc.)? Hand, band saw, mill, lathe, water jet, CNC mill Did you hang? No. The Driver Station Did you reprogram your dashboard code? Not to my knowledge. Did you use external controls beyond your joysticks? We had a heads up LED display, but no external controls Anything else? Any techniques that you feel might be beneficial to others in the future? Ensure you have a battery load tester. While we tested our batteries in the lab (plotting the full drain of the battery), having a battery load tester in the pits is crucial. We disposed of 3 batteries after the championship because they were beyond their life! We couldn't climb over the bump during the finals in LA because of bad batteries. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| its official!!!! Michigan Top 64 teams anounced! list up! | roboraven15 | District Events | 16 | 30-03-2009 14:22 |
| The top 8 teams will be....(2005) | Stephen Kowski | General Forum | 32 | 12-04-2005 19:26 |
| [OCCRA]: Top Ranking Teams Picking Alliances | Lisa Perez | OCCRA Q&A | 1 | 15-11-2004 20:31 |
| The top 8 teams will be....(2004) | Jessica Boucher | General Forum | 20 | 24-03-2004 22:31 |
| Who are your top ten teams? | archiver | 1999 | 1 | 23-06-2002 22:41 |