|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Statistics on top 20 teams?
1986: Curie #3 seed and finalist
Programming: What language did they use? Labview Threaded code or just poll in the teleop loop? huh? Did they do something in autonomous? If so, what worked? We could score all balls in any single zone from any position. Same basic program for each zone, just changed aim angle (robot orientation), kick strength, and number of kicks for each position. Our swerve drive allowed us to advance to each ball and maintain proper aim angle. Good success rate. We scored 3 several times. What problems did you encounter, if any, with WPILib? None CAN or PWM control? PWM Did you use the Classmate for programming your robot or student/school supplied computers? Other computers Robot Design: What sensors were used? Potentiometer on kicker pivot to measure drawback Magnetic encoder (KOP) on swerve steering to give absolute wheel orientation Horizontal gyro to measure robot orientation Verticle gyro to measure tilt on bumps and provide input to bump auto-pilot Magnetic switch on kicker cylinder to sense extend position Microswitches on ball magnet roller to signal ball possession Did you use the vision system? Tried to for autonomous. Gave up on it...too slow. We had momentary vision aiming that the driver could use on demand. If so, what modifications did you have to make to the code? I don't know that. What drive system? 4 wheel crab/swerve, CIM motors within the modules. Wide format. Wheels? 6" AM Plactions. How many motors? 4 CIMS - drive, 1 CIM - steering, 1 FP w/ modified gearbox - ball magnet roller What material was used for the frame (Aluminum, steel, unobtanium)? 3" aluminum C-channel, .875 dia x .055 wall aluminum tubing How did they control the ball? Foam pool noodle ball magnet roller, spin the ball against the carpet. Worked well. Energy storage for kicker (elastic, pneumatic, motor driven, etc.)? Pneumatic retract with elastic kick. We could release the kicker at any point of drawback which provided infinitely variable kick strength. This proved to be very advantagous. How did you cut your parts (water jet, LASER, mill, hand tools,etc.)? Water jet, mill, bandsaw Did you hang? No. We chose to keep scoring goals. The Driver Station Did you reprogram your dashboard code? Yes Did you use external controls beyond your joysticks? Yes, we duplicated several pushbottun functions that were also on the joystick so either driver could do them. Kicker strength throttle pot. was external from the joystick. Any problems in getting the USB to behave? Yes, often. I/O board and sometimes joystick would loose connection. Did you use any unusual controls like WiiMotes, XBox controllers, etc.? No. Joystick, pushbuttons, potentiometer. We did have an audible buzzer that signaled ball possession. Did you feel that the Classmate was fast enough? No. Anything else? Any techniques that you feel might be beneficial to others in the future? Facing our goals at all times with a crab drive was a big advantage for us. Last edited by jspatz1 : 01-05-2010 at 11:36. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| its official!!!! Michigan Top 64 teams anounced! list up! | roboraven15 | District Events | 16 | 30-03-2009 14:22 |
| The top 8 teams will be....(2005) | Stephen Kowski | General Forum | 32 | 12-04-2005 19:26 |
| [OCCRA]: Top Ranking Teams Picking Alliances | Lisa Perez | OCCRA Q&A | 1 | 15-11-2004 20:31 |
| The top 8 teams will be....(2004) | Jessica Boucher | General Forum | 20 | 24-03-2004 22:31 |
| Who are your top ten teams? | archiver | 1999 | 1 | 23-06-2002 22:41 |