2=0

[ExTexan]

I know this one. But I won't give the answer away to those who don't.

Thanks.....it made me scratch my head 40 years ago!

It would of have been easier for me to figure out if he had stated that a=1 and b=1

Ahh but making it easier wouldn't have been as much fun! and also....if 1=2 then doesn't 2=4? :-)

[PAR_WIG1350]

Originally Posted by iCurtis

What does your TI-84 have to say about: 1782^12 + 1841^12 = 1922^12?

Fermat's Last Theorem

that proof was EPIC, and it still is

[biojae]

Originally Posted by ExTexan

also....if 1=2 then doesn't 2=4? :-)

So, then you are saying 1 = 4 then?

a = b; b = c; a = c;
a = 1; b = 2; c = 4;
1 = 2; 2 = 4; 1 = 4;

and if 4 = 8, then would 8 = 16... and so on?
and if so then 1 = inf

[DonRotolo]

Originally Posted by Molten

Don't always believe your calculator. Sometimes they lie.

Beat me to it

Originally Posted by ExTexan

Thanks.....it made me scratch my head 40 years ago!

Heh, when I had hair to scratch through...

If we're talking about odd equalities, how 'bout this one:
6 of one = 1/2 dozen of the other.

[ExTexan]

So, then you are saying 1 = 4 then?

Well I actually hadn't thought of it that way but I guess if the inital formulas are correct then that is a valid assumption! Good one!