Go to Post You know you're addicted to FIRST when to you: 4's company, 5's a crowd, and 6 is someone off-sides. - Tetraman [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-05-2010, 20:29
CraigHickman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Attempting the impossible

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratdude747 View Post
from experience, chain tends to have always worked, but belts tend to be way too much trouble.

one of our mentors used to be on a wisconsin team (fondy fire). being from there, he told us something we should have followed: "team 93 once tried to use belts. there is a reason why they never have since."

better yet, i found that someone from there said it here on CD on another thread:
The only belt failures I have come across in FIRST are an improperly tensioned, aligned, or designed system. Belts can be stronger and more precise than chain when correctly executed. Please run some numbers, and examine the use of belts in applications other than FIRST, as we tend to be a fairly trigger happy bunch at discarding solutions.



Quote:
reasons to ban the belt from your drivetrain;

1. belts have a lesser surface of contact. therefore, they skip and slip under less torque
A correctly designed belt (the ones for high torque applications, ie part # 6486K116 from McMaster) will hold about even, if not more than equivalent sized chain (#25 in this case).

Quote:
2. related to #1, belts are harder to tension as belts stretch at a faster pace.
Incorrect. A Steel Belted belt (ie anything by Brecoflex) will not stretch under FIRST loads. Examine Outback Tracks as an example.

Quote:
3. weight- belt sprockets are HEAVY. unless you have access to a CNC or a very precise mill and operator. if not, you will pay a weight penalty.
Again, false. SDPSI sells aluminum pulleys that are fairly lightweight, and can be hand lightened if need be. Proper design of a robot (ie proper weights set during design, and so on) should allow decently heavy pulleys (up to 1lb) without penalty. Being overweight is a result of sloppy design, and nothing more.

Quote:
4. length- chain can be made shorter and longer, belts cannot.
This one has merits, but again points back to design. If you need that much variance in the design, you shouldn't even be looking at belts.

Quote:
in the long run, it seems that belts are better in high speed, low torque situations. Chain is for lower speed higher torque situations. unless your wheels are <2" diameter, you can almost always count on high torque. and hence why belts never worked for us.
I've built a 200lb robot that has pulled a FORD F150 in first gear (engine off) that ran entirely on McMaster timing belts. High torque can be achieved with belts.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Attempting the Bonus Round bensherman Rules/Strategy 18 13-01-2010 15:49
pic: Duece Attempting to Remove A Spoiler IraJason Extra Discussion 11 04-04-2007 23:36
Attempting to Cut BaneBot 56mm Shaft edthegeek Motors 6 15-01-2007 08:51
To Dream the Impossible Dream (Full Version) Ken Leung General Forum 16 01-01-2007 12:41
568 making the impossible possible...kinda Draqo Control System 6 24-03-2005 10:26


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:06.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi