Go to Post And then you realize...If you hadn't been working ALONGSIDE those engineers... you'd never have that other person to say, "Well, why don't you do this, so that it works?" - Nikhil Bajaj [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-05-2010, 11:37
548swimmer's Avatar
548swimmer 548swimmer is offline
CAD Leader
AKA: Alec Wagner
FRC #0548 (Robostangs)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 299
548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of
Re: Rule change suggestions for MARC 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post


Allow 2 defensive robots in the other alliances zone if and only if one of the robots is tipped over. Having a flipped robot is enough of a penalty.
I like the concept, but what if my robot flips over blocking one goal? Then the other robot that came in could block the remaining goal, eliminating scoring potential.

What if you allowed a second robot into the defensive zone only to right the flipped robot. Once the robot was righted, the alliance would have 10 seconds to figure out which robot will stay in the zone, and act on it.
__________________
My religion is physics, it can explain everything.

WINNER -- 2011 Waterford District
District Chairman's -- 2011 Waterford District
Finalist -- 2011 Ann Arbor District
State Chairman's -- 2011 Michigan State Championship
Quarter-finalist -- 2011 Galileo
2011 Championship -- Highest Ranking Score
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-05-2010, 11:40
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Data Nerd
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,057
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rule change suggestions for MARC 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by 548swimmer View Post
I like the concept, but what if my robot flips over blocking one goal? Then the other robot that came in could block the remaining goal, eliminating scoring potential.

What if you allowed a second robot into the defensive zone only to right the flipped robot. Once the robot was righted, the alliance would have 10 seconds to figure out which robot will stay in the zone, and act on it.
Well, then the other team would have a pretty big interest in NOT flipping you wouldn't they?
__________________




.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-05-2010, 11:43
548swimmer's Avatar
548swimmer 548swimmer is offline
CAD Leader
AKA: Alec Wagner
FRC #0548 (Robostangs)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 299
548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of548swimmer has much to be proud of
Re: Rule change suggestions for MARC 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
Well, then the other team would have a pretty big interest in NOT flipping you wouldn't they?
True, and that would accomplish the goal of reducing unnecessary ramming/flipping. I know that if we try hard enough, and have our elevator on, we can flip ourselves. I'm not sure if there are many other teams out there who can do that, but it may be an issue.

I do like the idea of less ramming, it would keep the driver's more focused on playing the actual game.

Which I just lost....
__________________
My religion is physics, it can explain everything.

WINNER -- 2011 Waterford District
District Chairman's -- 2011 Waterford District
Finalist -- 2011 Ann Arbor District
State Chairman's -- 2011 Michigan State Championship
Quarter-finalist -- 2011 Galileo
2011 Championship -- Highest Ranking Score
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MARC 2010 IS OPEN Steve Ketron General Forum 142 30-06-2010 00:59
Change to Rule SC9 David.Cook Rules/Strategy 1 08-01-2003 10:59
RULE CHANGE!!! archiver 1999 11 23-06-2002 22:12
Possible Rule change for Flordia? (Please) and the reason for more seeding rounds. archiver 1999 6 23-06-2002 22:09


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:44.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi