Go to Post We build because we can. - Danaca [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-05-2010, 13:57
Stephen Kowski's Avatar
Stephen Kowski Stephen Kowski is offline
BSEE, MSEE, JD
AKA: employed
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Posts: 1,144
Stephen Kowski has a reputation beyond reputeStephen Kowski has a reputation beyond reputeStephen Kowski has a reputation beyond reputeStephen Kowski has a reputation beyond reputeStephen Kowski has a reputation beyond reputeStephen Kowski has a reputation beyond reputeStephen Kowski has a reputation beyond reputeStephen Kowski has a reputation beyond reputeStephen Kowski has a reputation beyond reputeStephen Kowski has a reputation beyond reputeStephen Kowski has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Stephen Kowski
Re: pic: 2001: 267's Robot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
Thank you.

Why is it I just find these older robots so well designed and engineered? What were those arms made of? Looks like 2x1.

Sorry for all the questions but this is a very slick looking robot and it looks like something I can learn a lot from.
a big reason was one of their engineers donald tarca.... another huge reason was there was no autonomous so you didn't have to split time and build two robots to be competitive

It was 2X1 alum (unlike the steel frame they made in 2000). Roger's post was pretty on the money other than the fall. 267 relied on their track system that was still in contact with the ground while vertical. Their driver just drove it to initiate the fall (pre-autonomous) and when they fell over in the beginning of the match I believe there was a pneumatic cylinder on the bottom (not visible in these photos) that absorbed the energy from the fall.

The tail primarily acted as a counter balance for the weight of the goal. I cannot remember exactly but it was less than 100lbs. Without any balls in the goal it was pretty light from what I remember, but with the balls it became much heavier. I never saw them use it to reset the bridge, but I'll take Roger at his word.

One of the most interesting things to their design was if they were assisted by another robot they could place both goals on the bridge while going back for their end zone bonus (something few could do, and even fewer could do consistently which is what made 71 so dominant)

oh and the pneumatics powered the goals up and down, but if you look carefully you'll also see a gas shock in support
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video of team 71 2001 robot? chaoticprout General Forum 3 19-03-2007 01:01
pic: Penn Robotics 2001 Robot Ben Piecuch Robot Showcase 9 23-06-2006 01:09
Brazilian Buddy II (2001 Robot) Simone Robot Showcase 2 17-01-2003 19:44
267's belated thanks to our Archimides partners archiver 2001 6 24-06-2002 03:41
Coolest Robot Play of 2001 Dan 550 General Forum 9 27-11-2001 17:15


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:32.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi