|
|
|
 Your team will be more of a team and not a group of students who are just building a robot. Instead of being in FIRST, you will be FIRST. - JackN [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Your team will be more of a team and not a group of students who are just building a robot. Instead of being in FIRST, you will be FIRST. - JackN [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#14
26-05-2010, 23:35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Universal/Standard Drive Base
You have nothing to lose and lots to gain from this endeavor. The fact that more than one person has said that it cannot be done is good reason to try. You may find that they are right but you will still be better prepared for next season after an in-depth study of different drive systems.
Considering different materials is a great idea. As a robot inspector I savor every non Al frame! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Effective Drive Base | DiehardCybercard | Technical Discussion | 114 | 21-02-2010 21:44 |
| Drive() Not a Standard Toolset in EasyC? | Chris_Elston | Programming | 3 | 08-02-2006 09:01 |
| Four Wheel Drive Using Standard Transmissions | daviamp | Technical Discussion | 4 | 18-01-2006 20:03 |
| White Paper Discuss: Team 670 - Universal Drive Systems: Design and Analysis | ChrisCook | Extra Discussion | 13 | 01-07-2005 23:41 |
| White Paper Discuss: Standard Drive Photos | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 5 | 20-11-2003 20:00 |
Threaded Mode