|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
Closest to 60 is 171-180
171 - Strong Wisconsin team, a few regional wins 172 - The other pink team! 173 - 2002 Champions, 2007 Einstein, cool robots with cool arms 174 -Won 2 FLRs in a row and Buckeye in 2006 175 - Incredibly consistent, won a regional or division every year they existed except 2002 (CCA) and 2010 (fluke) 176 - 1999 World Champion, various regional wins throughout the decade, always the underdog 177 - 5 consecutive years on Einstein is all you need to say. 178 - Decent Northeast team 179 - "176 of Florida" always puts out a cool and unique robot that's strong at a tough event 180 - Former greats that always try something cool every year, 2002 Finalists |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
231-240 is another pretty strong set.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
Most accomplished group of 10 in the 4 digit range IMO goes to 171x...
1710 - 16 awards at 8 official events 1711 - Awards at every event 3 years running 1712 - Lots of awards - especially impressive given their veteran area 1714 - Multiple regional wins and regional chairman's 1716 - Multiple visualization awards 1717 - At least a finalist at every regional 3 years running 1718 - Powerful Michigan team 1719 - Umbrellas! |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
I like the larger blocks of teams too that seem to appear, like
20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90 110,120,130 230,240 350,360,370 Most of these also benefit from longevity (but that's also the definition of a "best team"). It might be meaningful to divide by years too. Then more stellar younger teams would float to the top. Teams ---- # up to ---- Awards 70 ----- 264 120 ---- 176 180 ---- 170 50 ----- 158 240 ---- 158 80 ----- 150 350 ---- 142 30 ----- 132 360 ---- 130 40 ----- 126 60 ----- 121 20 ----- 120 110 ---- 120 130 ---- 120 370 ---- 117 230 ---- 105 90 ----- 101 150 ---- 101 470 ---- 101 Last edited by Mark McLeod : 30-07-2010 at 08:28. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
Not to plug our own ten, but the 340's are pretty good for only having 6 teams. Especially with Chairmans...
340- 5- RCA,2- Division champs, 2-regional champs, 2-regional finalist 341- Hall of Fame,4-RCA, 1-Divison Champ, 4- Regional Champs, CMP EI 342- 4-RCA, 1-Regional Champ, 3- Regional finalists 343- 2-RCA, 1- Division Champ, 4- Regional Champs 346- 1- Reginal Champ, 3- Regional Finalist 348- 1- Division Champ, 1 CHMP Finalist ... 1 Hall of Fame, 15 Regional Chairman's Awards, 5 Division Champs, 12 Regional wins. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
Don't worry, by Koko Ed's definition you aren't in that group...
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
Quote:
) |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
how about 71-71?
![]() |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
There's probably more mistakes, got the info off the FIRST website.
![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
Normalize the question, otherwise the results are skewed and we can spend days arguing. "Best in the History of FIRST" shouldn't pit 1994 teams against 2010 teams because the dynamics are completely different between then and now.
I'd suggest an era-based approach, for example a 'last 5 years' approach. Dynasty teams from the early 2000's that haven't produced much as far as mult-regional wins, Einstein or CMP awards in recent years shouldn't get love over teams that have for the 'last 5 years'. Eras: The old-schoolers ('92-'99) denoting the days before coopertition The ramp-up ('00-'04) denoting the years before FRC really hit the bend in the exponential growth curve and also introduction of common COTS gearboxes The newGens ('05-'08) based upon the old control system GenNext ('09-present) based upon the new control system Last edited by JesseK : 30-07-2010 at 13:51. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
Quote:
Co-opertition started in '99. (Tecknocats were the last sole champ in '98 and Juggernauts, Delphi Elite and Aces High were the first Co-Champs in '99) Divisions started in 2001. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
Quote:
For the years 2005 to 2010 Teams Ending at ---- #Awards - #Teams ----------------------------- 70 ------- 117 --------- 7 120 ----- 105 --------- 7 360 ------ 89 ---------- 7 240 ------ 87 ---------- 7 1720 ---- 85 ---------- 9 180 ------ 84 --------- 10 350 ------ 79 ---------- 5 40 ------- 74 ---------- 5 370 ------ 74 ---------- 5 1520 ---- 72 ---------- 9 80 ------- 66 ---------- 6 230 ------ 64 ---------- 8 470 ------ 61 ---------- 6 300 ------ 59 ---------- 6 1630 ---- 58 ---------- 4 50 -------- 57 ---------- 4 110 ------ 56 ---------- 5 60 -------- 55 ---------- 6 1750 ----- 55 ---------- 9 130 ------ 54 ---------- 6 Note that the 1711-1720 & 1741-1750 blocks only existed for 4 of those 5 years. It's also interesting that for the 171-180 block of teams, each and every one of the teams remains active. Last edited by Mark McLeod : 31-07-2010 at 11:52. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
I count 8 Regional Championships for Team 343.
2001 FL 2001 VA 2002 FL 2002 MO 2005 VA 2006 VA 2008 GA 2010 SC |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The Top Ten
Wow the FIRST website is terrible for records. You'd think THE organizing body would keep the best records.
Good thing we have CD. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TIME magazine Lists the Segway as "Top Ten worst Tech failures..." | Kyle | Dean Kamen's Inventions | 37 | 01-06-2009 13:41 |
| Top Ten Tips From The Veterans | Garii | Robotics Education and Curriculum | 18 | 19-03-2009 02:41 |
| Top Ten Things NOT to do with the 2009 FRC Control System | Vince | FRC Control System | 9 | 16-12-2008 17:08 |
| Top Ten | BobC | General Forum | 22 | 28-04-2005 14:02 |
| Who do you guys think were the top ten teams? | archiver | 1999 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:41 |