|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#30
|
|
|
Re: Is the crio powerful enough?
Quote:
It can go fast, the board that I have clocks it at 100mhz (and it can go faster). Acquiring images will take up some resources on the FPGA, but if you are already making your own board (Most FPGAs are ball grid array ics) you could include an ARM (or something similar) processor to grab the image from the camera. Programming FPGAs is different then a CPU. Everything is in parallel. For example something simple that can provide weird results is: Code:
int a = 2, b = 3;
a = b;
b = a;
print("A : " + a);
print("B : " + b);
"A : 3" "B : 3" However, if executed on an FPGA: "A : 3" "B : 2" Since you are the one who is programming the FPGA, you could have it interface to the cRIO in any way that you want. The cRIO has ethernet, serial, SPI, I2C, analog in (this would require digital potentiometers and be slow), and digital IO. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Reimaging the cRio Issues there are no cRio devices on the subnet | Stuart | FRC Control System | 2 | 25-02-2009 23:41 |
| 617 IN THE LIMELIGHT (Close Enough) | bsmmoney | Chit-Chat | 0 | 08-03-2008 00:01 |
| pic: The gearbox that makes us so powerful | keenanmolner | Robot Showcase | 6 | 20-02-2007 02:11 |
| The end of mindstorms - no smiley face sad enough | Eric Reed | FIRST Lego League | 20 | 15-01-2004 16:00 |
| Enough with the bumpers! | archiver | 2000 | 2 | 23-06-2002 22:32 |