|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: FTC weight and number of drive motors
Its not always about what the drive train does to make the robot successful, yes it is a very important part of the robot since you wouldn't do anything with out it. But it really depends on what you design your robot to do. A great number of drive trains are variations of a "tank drive" Take for example Exploding Bacon last year started with a fast 6 wheel 2 motor drive robot. By the end of the season we had outfitted it to a 1:1 Geared 6 wheel 4 motor drive robot. We did this because we wanted to have a robot that was strong in pushing matches. The drive train is a big discussion with our team, last year we talked about it for on the upperside of 3 weeks.
As I said It really is up to you what you want your attributes to be. Anything you build can be successful if it is implied correctly, there really isn't a "golden drive train" in any application of mechanics really, each has its own weaknesses and strengths. Also I wouldn't worry about weight, there is no weight limit. Battery power, we didn't have any problems we ran 5 motors almost constantly during matches. But thats my $0.02 Andrew Last edited by Andrew Remmers : 13-09-2010 at 12:30. Reason: Forgot some points |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: FTC weight and number of drive motors
Fast drive trains have tended to be big let-downs in FTC from my experience and witnessing. Standard 1:1 with 3" wheels typically does the job, or if you want a little faster then 1:1 with 4" wheels may do it better. FTC is more about control than flying around the field; strategy can more than make up for lack of relative speed.
The weight differences between 2 motors and 4 motors is nominal; simply split the wiring at the controller for 2 motors per side instead of 1 motor per side. The difference in power of 2 motors vs 4 motors comes into play during pushing matches, of which there are many. It also comes into play for motor longevity; 4 motors tend to last longer than 2 simply because there are more motors to spread the load. As for raw pushing power, there is a noticeable difference, yet only if your bot maintains traction over the other bot. Push traction is a derived characteristic of wheel tread, center of gravity, and the height/direction of the contact point between your bot and another bot. As for battery life, it's been my experience that continuously-run or overloaded manipulators have more effect on the battery than a drive train does. Your design may not have any continuously-run components though (conveyor, intake roller, etc). Additionally, the difference in current draw between 2 drive train motors vs. 4 drive train motors is nominal. Last edited by JesseK : 13-09-2010 at 13:32. Reason: Battery Life |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: FTC weight and number of drive motors
We put 4 motors on our prototype robot during the middle of the season to test it, and even though it probably got run more than our bigger robot at demos, it barely ever burned out. Our 2 motor robot would burn out at the most inconvenient times, i.e. finals. We haven't tested it for sure, but we think 4 is better.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FTC]: [FTC]: Scrimmages and Off Season Events | jamie_1930 | FIRST Tech Challenge | 0 | 19-03-2010 13:15 |
| [FTC]: January Run Down and New FTC Pictures | ttldomination | FIRST Tech Challenge | 6 | 04-02-2009 13:18 |
| [FTC]: FTC Controller Station Connectivity (Bluetooth and USB) Issue | jbbjjbt | FIRST Tech Challenge | 6 | 05-11-2008 11:49 |
| [FTC]: Hey FTC teams, Vex and a chance to be on MTV? | Rich Kressly | FIRST Tech Challenge | 1 | 12-09-2007 13:35 |