|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Possession of Rolling Goal Question
I suppose the problem is that the definition is a lot more vague than the pull test and can be interpreted many different ways. I think the purpose of the definition was to say, "the robot cannot constrain the goal's movement to the movement of the robot, i.e. the robot cannot enclose the goal." But that came across a little differently. The GDC is handling it fairly well, but I think that maybe a little more organization on the forums would help teams, as you guys said earlier.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FTC]: FTC rolling scoring | johncap100 | FIRST Tech Challenge | 6 | 22-09-2010 17:05 |
| [FTC]: 5 or 10 point goal? | Chris is me | FIRST Tech Challenge | 5 | 19-11-2009 18:03 |
| [FTC]: FTC Center Goal Structure in Solidworks 2008 | Madison | FIRST Tech Challenge | 0 | 14-09-2009 14:23 |
| pic: FTC Scrimmage - Duel on the Delaware - Bot & Goal | Mr MOE | Extra Discussion | 4 | 21-12-2007 16:38 |
| Question about the goal | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 24-06-2002 00:24 |