|
|
|
 Wait hold the phone. Do you mean its physically possible to not spend time on robotics during the season?!!! Too much.......for brain......to compute!...goes against.....beliefs........aaaaarrrrrrghhhhhh!!!
[syntax error] - BuddyB309 [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: LabVIEW - memory efficiency
Greetings,
LabVIEW programs are typically much larger than their ROBOTC counterparts, but 70 kB is excessive. 20-40 kB is more typical w/40 kB being a pretty large program. As Ethan states, the use of sub vi.s can drastically reduce memory requirements. Any spot where you reuse code is likely a good candidate for a subvi. Finally, if you could post your code, I'm sure there are several folks here who would help try and find out where all your memory is being used. 
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FTC]: Bluetooth Problem with LabView/FTC Controller Station | James Dowd | FIRST Tech Challenge | 8 | 27-10-2009 10:40 |
| [FTC]: Using two Hitechnic Motor Controllers in LabView | ZSLAYTER | FIRST Tech Challenge | 2 | 08-03-2009 10:36 |
| Cruch Time Help! 3 LabVIEW Tutorial Videos: State Machines; Faster Code; Simulation | LVMastery | NI LabVIEW | 11 | 09-02-2009 14:36 |
| LabView Functions Palette missing WPI VI's | ksquared | NI LabVIEW | 1 | 31-01-2009 15:03 |
| [FTC]: FTC Servo-Motor Problem with Labview | dnhansen | FIRST Tech Challenge | 1 | 26-10-2008 00:43 |
Hybrid Mode
