|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Defense robots and competition
From a design side of things, lack of time or limited fabrication abilities means that an elaborate scoring mechanism is often times not achievable while a simple drive-base with quickness and agility is almost always achievable. Just plain getting in the way may be all that some teams in certian circumstances is all that they can achieve and so defense is their only real option.
Not saying that I promote this line of reasoning. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Defense robots for 2010 game.. | kapolavery | General Forum | 44 | 21-01-2010 22:28 |
| [FTC]: FTC Competition kits are here... | PhilBot | FIRST Tech Challenge | 17 | 10-09-2009 14:24 |
| [FTC]: Defense vs. Gracious Professionalism | dcribbs | FIRST Tech Challenge | 17 | 10-04-2009 11:51 |
| [FTC]: FTC/VEX Competition in Miami | kfrazier | FIRST Tech Challenge | 0 | 28-02-2008 10:50 |
| Looking for a rule - No defense on robots without tubes | Don Wright | Rules/Strategy | 53 | 12-03-2007 14:18 |