Go to Post Just wondering what types of food you have been living off of while working on your robot? Our team has had pizza almost 3-4 times a week or more. Just wondering. SGS DRAGONS - sgsdragons [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > Rumor Mill
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 9 votes, 4.56 average. Display Modes
  #46   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 13:44
dag0620 dag0620 is offline
Because we're FiNE
AKA: David Givens
FRC #1071 (Team MAX)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 784
dag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericzundel View Post
A box of Gurl Scout cookies is under $5 and I believe the Boy Scout popcorn sales have some kind of $10 option.

-Eric.
Being a Boy Scout myself, I can tell you that while GS cookies are the most successful thing an organization has ever sold, BSA popcorn has never done well, to the point where my Troop has decided to completely ditch using that as a fund-raiser.

This then brings my main concern about using this as a fundraiser. If selling slightly over-priced popcorn and not doing well, how am I going to sell $25 LED's? With all the government credits out there, and I'm sure within a year or two the price will come down and they'll end up on the deal rack at Home Depot who will buy them?

Maybe I'm wrong, and I very well could be, but if I was going to start using this as a fund-raiser, I would have to see another team do this and get successful results.

Don't get me wrong LED's are great way to go with lighting in the future, but as a fund-raiser for FRC, I don't think it could work.

My $0.02.
__________________
David Givens
Alumnus Team Max 1071 ('13) | FIRST Volunteer | NE FIRST

Away making magic for a bit...
Reply With Quote
  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 14:29
IndySam's Avatar
IndySam IndySam is offline
Registered User
FRC #0829 (Digital Goats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,362
IndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katie_UPS View Post
Read into this: People generally don't like thinking about/planning out the(ir) future.



Read into this: You would think people would make decisions based off what's cheaper in the long run, but they don't.



Read into this: More than half of the people would rather get £45 now than £70 later. You can apply this to savings: people would rather save 20 dollars (estimated) now and buy cheap bulbs, than save X (greater than 20) over time any buy expensive bulbs. You see this with food too: processed vs. natural- many will argue that natural/unprocessed food is better for you, but processed food is cheaper/easier.

I'm not a major in Psychology-I've only had one year in high school- but studies repeatedly show that people don't think logically.

Personally, I'm against this. Its a step in the right direction, but not really with the right foot. I'm glad that FIRST is trying to help out teams but I'd rather see the Google money being spent elsewhere.
People who have been around a while understand that when you are told a time to payback by somebody trying to sell something then you should increase that 50% to 400% in the real world.

I can't afford spending hundreds of dollars on a new technology that has no other benefit other than potential costs savings in the future. Especially when that potential could be way off. It's just not gonna happen.
__________________
"Champions are champions not because they do anything extraordinary but because they do the ordinary things better than anyone else." —Chuck Knoll


2015 Indianapolis District Winner
2014 Boilermaker Regional Industrial Design Award
2013 Smoky Mountain Regional Industrial Design Award
2012 Boilermaker Engineering Excellence Award
2010 Boilermaker Rockwell Innovation in Control Award.
2009 Buckeye J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2009 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2008 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2007 St Louis Regional Winners
Reply With Quote
  #48   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 14:56
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,722
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndySam View Post
People who have been around a while understand that when you are told a time to payback by somebody trying to sell something then you should increase that 50% to 400% in the real world.

I can't afford spending hundreds of dollars on a new technology that has no other benefit other than potential costs savings in the future. Especially when that potential could be way off. It's just not gonna happen.
Oi. This hits the nail on the head for a home consumer -- no one lightbulb in (at least) my house is responsible for any significant portion of the lighting consumed in my house over the course of a day. The lights aren't even on for significant portions of time throughout the day (2-4 hours at most). Ergo, while it's logical that I would spend considerably less money on energy, you're right that for it to have noticeable effect over the next year that I'd have to spend several hundred dollars up front. This basically puts the target consumer at someone who will live in their current residence long enough to see the benefit to begin with: a homeowner.

Very specifically, homeowners who may sell their homes in the next year would be perfect target consumers for these specific bulbs: they increase a home's appeal to potential home buyers. These guys would purchase the bulbs in [somewhat] "bulk" quantities in order to replace most or all bulbs within a home. While the housing market in many areas is in a slump, I'm sure there are some houses being successfully sold in most areas ... so perhaps this is an avenue teams can take.

Other potential [somewhat bulk] buyers are Nursing Homes, (maybe) Apartment complexes who are looking to appeal to an energy-conscious renter, etc. Teams could get creative with what's in their area.

Longer-term, these bulbs need to come down in price. The only way (at least in a way we have the power to influence, since no one knows how insane the margins are on a single bulb) to do so is to increase demand for the technology significantly. Looking around work today, I see hundreds and hundreds of 4' long fluorescent bulbs with a ~1" diameter -- the same standard bulb I see used almost everywhere (in the schools, corporate buildings, labs, etc). Maybe next year we can expand this program to sell light bulbs that fit into the same sockets our sponsors have so we may expand our fund raising efforts to them.

Heh, expand our fund raising to our current sponsors ... what a conundrum.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
Reply With Quote
  #49   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 15:09
Brandon Holley's Avatar
Brandon Holley Brandon Holley is offline
Chase perfection. Catch excellence.
AKA: Let's bring CD back to the way it used to be
FRC #0125 (NU-TRONs, Team #11 Alumni (GO MORT))
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,593
Brandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Brandon Holley
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
Looking around work today, I see hundreds and hundreds of 4' long fluorescent bulbs with a ~1" diameter -- the same standard bulb I see used almost everywhere (in the schools, corporate buildings, labs, etc). Maybe next year we can expand this program to sell light bulbs that fit into the same sockets our sponsors have so we may expand our fund raising efforts to them.

Heh, expand our fund raising to our current sponsors ... what a conundrum.
Believe me, many companies are attempting to develop that exact bulb you describe. It's not as easy as it may appear.

-Brando
__________________
MORT (Team 11) '01-'05 :
-2005 New Jersey Regional Chairman's Award Winners
-2013 MORT Hall of Fame Inductee

NUTRONs (Team 125) '05-???
2007 Boston Regional Winners
2008 & 2009 Boston Regional Driving Tomorrow's Technology Award
2010 Boston Regional Creativity Award
2011 Bayou Regional Finalists, Innovation in Control Award, Boston Regional Finalists, Industrial Design Award
2012 New York City Regional Winners, Boston Regional Finalists, IRI Mentor of the Year
2013 Orlando Regional Finalists, Industrial Design Award, Boston Regional Winners, Pine Tree Regional Finalists
2014 Rhode Island District Winners, Excellence in Engineering Award, Northeastern University District Winners, Industrial Design Award, Pine Tree District Chairman's Award, Pine Tree District Winners
2015 South Florida Regional Chairman's Award, NU District Winners, NEDCMP Industrial Design Award, Hopper Division Finalists, Hopper/Newton Gracious Professionalism Award
Reply With Quote
  #50   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 17:15
artdutra04's Avatar
artdutra04 artdutra04 is offline
VEX Robotics Engineer
AKA: Arthur Dutra IV; NERD #18
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,078
artdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndySam View Post
People who have been around a while understand that when you are told a time to payback by somebody trying to sell something then you should increase that 50% to 400% in the real world.
Or you can run the calculations yourself and figure it out.

Let's say you have an incandescent light bulb that just died, and you're considering replacing it with LED light bulb. Not replacing the light bulb is not an option. Any potential savings in cost from an LED bulb will be placed into an investment/401k/IRA/etc portfolio, where an average rate of return of 8% (over the life of the investment, obviously not during these past few years) is not uncommon.

The first step is to calculate the initial cost. The cost of a "long life" (20,000 hours life) 60W incandescent bulb is about $2, and the market price of an 7W LED bulb (40,000 hours life) is $25. Let's say a twin-pack of incandescent bulbs was purchased at the same time, so the net initial cost of an LED bulb over two incandescent bulbs required to meet the same lifespan is $21.

The second step is to calculate the annual cost. In Connecticut, electricity currently costs about $0.20/kWh for residential customers! (That's what happens when you let NIMBYs block any new generating plants or transmission lines). Let's say the light bulb that died was on for eight hours a day, every day, which results in an on time of 2992 hours per year.

The 60W incandescent bulb will use 179.52 kWh of electricity, while the 7W LED bulb will use 20.944 kWh. Using the price of electricity above, the incandescent bulb will cost $35.91/year while the LED will cost $4.19. Switching to LED will yield an annual savings of $31.72 in CT. Redoing these calculations with the US national average of $0.1153/kWh results in an annual savings of $18.28.

The last part is to ascertain how long we will do these calculations for. At the above stated use levels, 40,000 hours / 2992 hours/year = 13.36 years. I'll round down to 13 years.

So now we can plug this into time-value-of-money economics equations to determine whether or not it's worth it to invest in LED bulbs. I'll calculate this using the annual worth method, and if the final value is greater than zero, the idea is profitable relative to the status quo and should be pursued.

AWConnecticut(8%) = -$21(A/P, 8%, 13 years) + ($35.91) = -$2.66 + $35.91 = $33.25

AWUS Average(8%) = -$21(A/P, 8%, 13 years) + ($18.28) = -$2.66 + $18.28 = $15.62

Thus, in both cases, the LED bulbs both result in an positive annual profit over the status quo (incandescent bulbs), and depending on what area of the country you live in and how much you use light bulbs, they may even pay for themselves in less than a year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndySam View Post
I can't afford spending hundreds of dollars on a new technology that has no other benefit other than potential costs savings in the future. Especially when that potential could be way off. It's just not gonna happen.
No reason to replace every bulb at once. Replacement by attrition spreads the "initial price shock" out over a period of several years.

As for the "potential" part, that relies on the accuracy of the life-span characteristics of the new LED bulbs. Assuming the life span follows a normal distribution, a very large standard deviation in the mean life expectancy would be required to have a high sensitivity of the expected savings. Using a simple non time-value-of-money approach, the point at which a LED bulb breaks even against an incandescent is

(price of LED - price of incandescent) / ((watts of incandescent - watts of LED) * price per kWh)

($25-$2) / (0.06 - 0.007) * 0.1153) = 3763.76 hours.

Thus, the savings are only "potential" if the lifespan of the LED bulb is less than 3764 hours. There would have to be an INCREDIBLY HUGE standard deviation in the life span of LED bulbs to lead to a even a 1% chance of not profiting off replacing an incandescent bulb with an LED bulb.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
Longer-term, these bulbs need to come down in price. The only way (at least in a way we have the power to influence, since no one knows how insane the margins are on a single bulb) to do so is to increase demand for the technology significantly. Looking around work today, I see hundreds and hundreds of 4' long fluorescent bulbs with a ~1" diameter -- the same standard bulb I see used almost everywhere (in the schools, corporate buildings, labs, etc). Maybe next year we can expand this program to sell light bulbs that fit into the same sockets our sponsors have so we may expand our fund raising efforts to them.
While Brandon might provide a better answer to this, the fluorescent tube lights are different than the squiggly lights one puts in a residential light fixture, in that they have an external ballast to pump the voltage up to around 600V. Any drop in replacement bulb would therefore have to run at 600V, which presents a major challenge. Removing the ballast and wiring the tube fixture directly to 120 or 240 VAC would probably make it easier to make LED tube lights, but would eliminate the possibility of putting a fluorescent tube back in.
__________________
Art Dutra IV
Robotics Engineer, VEX Robotics, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI)
Robowranglers Team 148 | GUS Robotics Team 228 (Alumni) | Rho Beta Epsilon (Alumni) | @arthurdutra

世上无难事,只怕有心人.
Reply With Quote
  #51   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 17:48
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,125
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
The cost of a "long life" (20,000 hours life) 60W incandescent bulb
did you mean 2,000 hours?


Quote:
is about $2,
Four-pack for $1.20 = $0.30 each


Quote:
In Connecticut, electricity currently costs about $0.20/kWh for residential customers!
Areas served by nuclear power plants pay as little as $0.015 off-peak.


Quote:
Redoing these calculations with the US national average of $0.1153/kWh results in an annual savings of $18.28.
You are ignoring the value of the heat emitted by the incandescent. In colder climates, this is not waste heat. It helps heat the house. You have to figure in the price of the heating fuel you saved.


Quote:
Let's say the light bulb that died was on for eight hours a day, every day, which results in an on time of 2992 hours per year.
This seems unrealistic as an average, unless you are suggesting replacing only high-use bulbs with LED.


Reply With Quote
  #52   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 17:54
JaneYoung JaneYoung is offline
Onward through the fog.
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Austin, TX USA
Posts: 5,996
JaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

There's a lot of energy and brain power being used in this thread.
__________________
Excellence is contagious. ~ Andy Baker, President, AndyMark, Inc. and Woodie Flowers Award 2003

Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, ambition inspired, and success achieved.
~ Helen Keller
(1880-1968)
Reply With Quote
  #53   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 18:09
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,825
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Ether, if I'm not mistaken, Art was doing a simplified version, similar to what an engineering economics professor might do as an in-class exercise. He also neglected inflation. As a matter of fact, as soon as I started reading the setup, I remembered a class I was in last spring, namely, Engineering Economics. Build one transmission line or 2, based on X cost/line and Y capacity--but where are the material/transportation costs?

Does that other stuff have to be factored in? The nuclear power is (or should be) included in the national average, which was also done. Heating of the room depends on large part on both the size of the room and the number (and type) of light bulbs; for my living room at home, one light bulb normally, 2-7 at peak lighting, that is minimal heating. We get more from the people in the room. So that's not a whole lot of heating fuel saved by using incandescent.

As for the light being on 8 hours a day, during the winter, it's quite possible to be up (and in one room) for quite some time, say 5-9 or 10, while it's dark, and another couple of hours in the morning, so easily about 6-7 hours. Stay up late often enough, and you could make a case for 8 hours. It also makes for decent calculations.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #54   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 19:35
artdutra04's Avatar
artdutra04 artdutra04 is offline
VEX Robotics Engineer
AKA: Arthur Dutra IV; NERD #18
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,078
artdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
did you mean 2,000 hours?

Four-pack for $1.20 = $0.30 each
Here's my source for the figures I chose: http://www.amazon.com/WATTS-LIGHT-FR.../dp/B000ST9AMM

Using numbers for cheaper incandescent bulbs with 1/10 the life and 1/6 the price of the one I quoted only benefits the LED replacement case.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
Areas served by nuclear power plants pay as little as $0.015 off-peak.
The prices I chose were listed on the Department of Energy website: http://www.eia.doe.gov/electricity/epm/table5_6_b.html

Prices of $0.015/kWh would be great if the US got 80% of their electricity from nuclear plants like France does, but given paranoia over nuclear power plants (there has still yet to be a single confirmed death or case of cancer from Three Mile Island) and a lack of a long-term nuclear waste disposal/processing/storage facility (like Yucca Mountain proposal), we're going to be stuck with much higher average electricity prices for some time, probably until nuclear fusion research yields a commercially viable solution (last I've seen, Chinese scientists have been able to sustain a 10 million degree Celsius fusion reaction for 400 seconds, and 100 million degree Celsius reaction for 60 seconds).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
You are ignoring the value of the heat emitted by the incandescent. In colder climates, this is not waste heat. It helps heat the house. You have to figure in the price of the heating fuel you saved.
But in the summer, your air conditioning has to fight the heat generated by incandescent bulbs. I've seen prior calculations (can't seem to find the link now) that show from a heating/cooling issue between incandescent and CFL bulbs is a wash for most of the US. If I can find the link, I'll share it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
This seems unrealistic as an average, unless you are suggesting replacing only high-use bulbs with LED.
I chose eight hours per day as an average value for most lights in "busy" areas of a house/apartment.

I was considering solving these equations as a function of the hours per day of operation, but then I realized that the only difference this has is to shrink or widen the time bands. The ratio of break even point relative to the entire life of the bulb remains the same. The only way the hours or operation per year would affect the break even point relative to the total life of the bulb would be if degradation of the bulb over time occured. AFAIK this doesn't happen, so that's why I chose a fixed value (eight hours per day) to simplify calculations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH
Ether, if I'm not mistaken, Art was doing a simplified version, similar to what an engineering economics professor might do as an in-class exercise. He also neglected inflation. As a matter of fact, as soon as I started reading the setup, I remembered a class I was in last spring, namely, Engineering Economics. Build one transmission line or 2, based on X cost/line and Y capacity--but where are the material/transportation costs?
It's somewhat simplified, but the annual worth method is used to compare investing in an idea relative to investing in the status quo. Since inflation would affect both equally, it cancels out of these equations.

However, factoring in inflation is necessary if you want to calculate the present or future value of the savings (annual payment).
__________________
Art Dutra IV
Robotics Engineer, VEX Robotics, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI)
Robowranglers Team 148 | GUS Robotics Team 228 (Alumni) | Rho Beta Epsilon (Alumni) | @arthurdutra

世上无难事,只怕有心人.
Reply With Quote
  #55   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 20:23
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,125
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
Here's my source for the figures I chose: http://www.amazon.com/WATTS-LIGHT-FR.../dp/B000ST9AMM
I didn't see a lumen rating anywhere on that site. Do you own any of these? What's the lumen rating ?


Quote:
The prices I chose were listed on the Department of Energy website: http://www.eia.doe.gov/electricity/epm/table5_6_b.html
Yes. My point was, the analysis depends heavily on the electric rates in your local area.


Quote:
But in the summer, your air conditioning has to fight the heat generated by incandescent bulbs.
Of course. But in summer you use the lights a whole lot less, and most days (in colder climates) you can leave the windows open and let the breeze cool the room.


Quote:
I've seen prior calculations (can't seem to find the link now) that show from a heating/cooling issue between incandescent and CFL bulbs is a wash for most of the US.
The operative phrase above is highlighted. In my post, I specifically mentioned colder climates.


Quote:
I chose eight hours per day as an average value for most lights in "busy" areas of a house/apartment.
Thanks for clarifying that.


Quote:
I was considering solving these equations as a function of the hours per day of operation, but then I realized that the only difference this has is to shrink or widen the time bands. The ratio of break even point relative to the entire life of the bulb remains the same.
But "break even point relative to the entire life of the bulb" is not the metric you care about. To illustrate this point by (unrealistic) exaggeration, imagine you used each bulb only 2 minutes per day. The break-even point would be too far out into the future to even make a useful analysis.




Last edited by Ether : 10-12-2010 at 20:39.
Reply With Quote
  #56   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2010, 20:31
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,125
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
...that is minimal heating. We get more from the people in the room. So that's not a whole lot of heating fuel saved by using incandescent.
Precisely. It's minimal. But that's what the whole case for LEDs is based on: the "minimal" "waste" heat generated by the inefficient incandescent bulbs.

So, either the "waste" heat is minimal and we shouldn't bother about it, or it's not minimal, in which case it should be factored into the equation.

By the way, in the winter, I keep 7 100-watt incandescent bulbs burning in desk, table, and floor lamps situated throughout the study, and it keeps the room nice and comfortable.



Reply With Quote
  #57   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-12-2010, 09:07
diviney diviney is offline
Registered User
FRC #2377
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 43
diviney has a spectacular aura aboutdiviney has a spectacular aura aboutdiviney has a spectacular aura about
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

You can quibble over the math and assumptions all you want. Regardless of the nuances there, it is clear to me that these can indeed "pay for themselves", and I think most of us (maybe not the general population) can get past the psychology and invest now for future savings...

Having said that, I still won't buy them (for an entirely different reason). It is my belief that this technology is changing so rapidly that I am better off waiting. In a couple years, the efficiencies will be even better, and the cost will be dramatically less.

To me, it's not a question of if, but rather when. Early adopters always get burned. Think of the guy that spent $5K on that 50" plasma TV. Now they are approaching $500 (10X reduction). I believe it won't be very long at all before the $20 LED bulb costs $2 (maybe even a couple years). Then I will put them all over the place while feeling sorry for the poor saps that paid $20 each.
Reply With Quote
  #58   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-12-2010, 09:57
IndySam's Avatar
IndySam IndySam is offline
Registered User
FRC #0829 (Digital Goats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,362
IndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
Originally Posted by artdutra04 View Post
Or you can run the calculations yourself and figure it out.
But you calculations make my point. Instead of using average costs for the country you picked a rate that's almost 4 times what I would pay, a light bulb cost way too high and a usage rate above what my hardest used light bulb would generate. Things like that make my skeptic alarm go off, big time.

That's what salespeople do, over exaggerate things to prove their point.
__________________
"Champions are champions not because they do anything extraordinary but because they do the ordinary things better than anyone else." —Chuck Knoll


2015 Indianapolis District Winner
2014 Boilermaker Regional Industrial Design Award
2013 Smoky Mountain Regional Industrial Design Award
2012 Boilermaker Engineering Excellence Award
2010 Boilermaker Rockwell Innovation in Control Award.
2009 Buckeye J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2009 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2008 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2007 St Louis Regional Winners
Reply With Quote
  #59   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-12-2010, 11:09
artdutra04's Avatar
artdutra04 artdutra04 is offline
VEX Robotics Engineer
AKA: Arthur Dutra IV; NERD #18
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,078
artdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond reputeartdutra04 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndySam View Post
But you calculations make my point. Instead of using average costs for the country you picked a rate that's almost 4 times what I would pay, a light bulb cost way too high and a usage rate above what my hardest used light bulb would generate. Things like that make my skeptic alarm go off, big time.

That's what salespeople do, over exaggerate things to prove their point.
I did the calculations for both Connecticut (as an extreme) and the US national average. The US average is $0.1153/kWh, and the stated average for an Indiana residential property in August 2010 is $0.091/kWh. Redoing the math from my first post using the Indiana electricity price yields an annual savings of $14.43. Plugging that into the annual worth equation yields annual savings of $11.77. At these usage levels, it would take just over two years to break even. At lower usage levels (four hours per day), it would take ~4.5 years to break even. Over the lifespan of the bulb (neglecting inflation or electricity price changes) this still results in a net profit of $128.

Either way, these calculations won't matter after 2012 when new energy efficiency standards take effect that require all standard light bulbs between 310 and 2600 lumens to be 30% more efficient than baseline incandescent bulbs, or in 2020 when even tighter standards will require all bulbs to produce at least 45 lumens per watt. While this has spurred more innovation in lighting technology in the past five years than the previous fifty, the core benefits from all improved technology have thus far been from long-term savings and benefits. It's likely that as the technology improves and production ramps up the initial prices of these improved bulbs (whether CFL, LED or high-efficiency incandescent) will approach parity with plain incandescent bulbs.
__________________
Art Dutra IV
Robotics Engineer, VEX Robotics, Inc., a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI)
Robowranglers Team 148 | GUS Robotics Team 228 (Alumni) | Rho Beta Epsilon (Alumni) | @arthurdutra

世上无难事,只怕有心人.
Reply With Quote
  #60   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-12-2010, 11:19
IndySam's Avatar
IndySam IndySam is offline
Registered User
FRC #0829 (Digital Goats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,362
IndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Fundraiser: Selling LED "Lightbulbs"

Quote:
Originally Posted by artdutra04 View Post
I did the calculations for both Connecticut (as an extreme) and the US national average. The US average is $0.1153/kWh, and the stated average for an Indiana residential property in August 2010 is $0.091/kWh. Redoing the math from my first post using the Indiana electricity price yields an annual savings of $14.43. Plugging that into the annual worth equation yields annual savings of $11.77. At these usage levels, it would take just over two years to break even. At lower usage levels (four hours per day), it would take ~4.5 years to break even. Over the lifespan of the bulb (neglecting inflation or electricity price changes) this still results in a net profit of $128.

Either way, these calculations won't matter after 2012 when new energy efficiency standards take effect that require all standard light bulbs between 310 and 2600 lumens to be 30% more efficient than baseline incandescent bulbs, or in 2020 when even tighter standards will require all bulbs to produce at least 45 lumens per watt. While this has spurred more innovation in lighting technology in the past five years than the previous fifty, the core benefits from all improved technology have thus far been from long-term savings and benefits. It's likely that as the technology improves and production ramps up the initial prices of these improved bulbs (whether CFL, LED or high-efficiency incandescent) will approach parity with plain incandescent bulbs.
But are those rates all peak? That would also throw you off.

Here in Indy the rate is less than your stated average Indiana average .08794 peak .06119 mid-peak and .02948 off peak.

But that doesn't change my original point of the numbers presented by advocates being worst case instead of real world and we haven't even discussed equivalent lumens yet.

also when the world ends on Dec 21 2012 it won't matter anyway
__________________
"Champions are champions not because they do anything extraordinary but because they do the ordinary things better than anyone else." —Chuck Knoll


2015 Indianapolis District Winner
2014 Boilermaker Regional Industrial Design Award
2013 Smoky Mountain Regional Industrial Design Award
2012 Boilermaker Engineering Excellence Award
2010 Boilermaker Rockwell Innovation in Control Award.
2009 Buckeye J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2009 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2008 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2007 St Louis Regional Winners
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Analog inputs not "working" — I only detect "noise" keehun Programming 11 31-12-2008 19:01
Championship Event - Where the "Random" Match Sorting Really "Shines" Travis Hoffman Championship Event 57 19-04-2007 08:06
New NEMO White Papers! "Creating a Killer Packet" and "25 Ways to Sponsor" Jessica Boucher Team Organization 0 10-08-2005 10:55
"Thunderbirds" Vs. "Team America" Which one will rule the box office? Elgin Clock Chit-Chat 3 07-09-2004 19:53
Conflict between "Initialize_Tracker()" and "pwm13 & pwm15"? Kevin? gnormhurst Programming 3 22-02-2004 02:55


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:40.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi