Go to Post FIRST is supposed to be a learning experience. Learn first, win awards later. - evulish [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Other > FIRST Tech Challenge
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-12-2010, 12:27
team F.T.C 4240's Avatar
team F.T.C 4240 team F.T.C 4240 is offline
Two cookies, one robot, all awesome
AKA: Derrick Maust
FTC #4240 (Techno Clovers)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 94
team F.T.C 4240 has a spectacular aura aboutteam F.T.C 4240 has a spectacular aura about
Re: [FTC]: Defense robots and competition

[quote=gblake;985926]Depending on whether or not you were bashing into the other robot, or simply playing tight defense; I would encourage you to politely but firmly disagree with that ref, and to politely but firmly appeal to the head ref if you feel that the refs opinions/prejusdices result in any non-trivial disadvantages for your team.

[EDIT] I just read the post that says an ally was ramming an opponent - Ramming is not the same as pushing. - When I am ref'ing I definitely tell teams not to repeatedly back up and hit an opponent; and not to take aim from far away, and then charge into an opponent at high speed.[/EDIT]

Well you are right in the sense of not bashing into other robots at high speeds, but that is what our alliance was doing. We pushed the rolling goal to the other side and started to score and both apposing robots where trying to get batons out from the low and high dispensers. Our alliance partner was in the middle ramming one then the other making so they couldn't dispense so that is my guess why he (as in the head ref) said it, also he happened to be reffing our match so it wasn't like someone had to get him or anything. Also our partner showed up at the last minuet so we just said play defense so thats what they did and we really should have made it more clear what we meant by defense. I did agree with the ref then we had a rematch and it went well there on out.
__________________
"Like" us on Facebook to get info and updates on the team: http://www.facebook.com/FTCTechnoClovers
2008-09: MD Finalist Alliance Captain, MD Inspire Award Winner, Worlds Division Finalist.
2009-10: MD Winning Alliance Captain, MD Think Award Winner, OH Winning Alliance Captain.
2010-11: MD Finalist Alliance Captain, MD Innovate Award Winner, DE Winning Alliance Captain, Worlds Edison Division Finalist Alliance Captain.
2011-2012: MD Annapolis Qualifier Winning Alliance, PTC Design Winner.
DE State Inspire Award Winner.
MD State Winning Alliance Captain, PTC Design Winner.
World Championship Franklin Winning Alliance, Thanks Landroids and Cougar Robotics!
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defense robots for 2010 game.. kapolavery General Forum 44 21-01-2010 22:28
[FTC]: FTC Competition kits are here... PhilBot FIRST Tech Challenge 17 10-09-2009 14:24
[FTC]: Defense vs. Gracious Professionalism dcribbs FIRST Tech Challenge 17 10-04-2009 11:51
[FTC]: FTC/VEX Competition in Miami kfrazier FIRST Tech Challenge 0 28-02-2008 10:50
Looking for a rule - No defense on robots without tubes Don Wright Rules/Strategy 53 12-03-2007 14:18


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:36.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi