2nd Ammendment Rights: Should Guns Be Banned?

[Johca_Gaorl]

Originally posted by A. Snodgrass
Ive seen many many people who are against gun laws ignore the part of the second amendment which says that"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, " which implies that the whole amendment is about the topic of a WELL REGULATED MILITIA and everything thereafter pertains to that fact. If the weapon in question is not something that would fit that part of the constitution, there is nothing wrong with the banning of that weapon.

"being necessary to the security of a free State"

This implies that it is to protect the states from tyranny of the federal gov't, b/c a militia would be state run. So in this day and age, could you fight against a tyrannical federal gov't which has assault rifles and rocket launchers with pistols and shotguns? I would think not. I'm sorry I didn't respond to all of your points, I really am not feeling too well right now, and don't have the patience to write out everything.