Go to Post Wisdom shared is priceless, isn't it? And timeless. - JaneYoung [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2011, 16:37
Rangel's Avatar
Rangel Rangel is offline
John Rangel
FRC #0842 (Falcon Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 742
Rangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond repute
6WD vs 8WD

Team 842 has been thinking of future drive trains recently and here are some of our ideas.

6WD
One design is a 6 wheel drive consisting of 2 super shifters in the center of our robot belted up to omnis in the front and back and a center traction wheel. We are also considering replacing the omnis with the same traction wheels used in the center. What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this?

8WD
Our 8 wheel drive train idea is entirely based off team 67's drive train. From what I have seen this past year, this drive train seemed to dominate all others. What makes this such a good drive train?


A few questions we have are what are the pros and cons of both of these drive trains and which one would be faster and which one would have more traction. I mean this on flat carpet by the way. I also have one other question, why is it that some wheels get lower? Is it only because there was a bump in last years game? One more question, what are the advantages of using the different size wheels in the 8 wheel drive train idea. If you have any ideas on how to improve these drive trains it would be greatly appreciated.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	67.jpg
Views:	573
Size:	50.6 KB
ID:	9573  Click image for larger version

Name:	Helga.png
Views:	556
Size:	34.8 KB
ID:	9574  Click image for larger version

Name:	8WD.jpg
Views:	801
Size:	75.1 KB
ID:	9575  
__________________
2012 Dean's List Winner
2011-2014 Arizona Regional Winners
2016 Las Vegas Regional Winner
2014-? Mentor


  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2011, 17:11
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,803
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

Speed and traction: Depends mainly on surfaces and gearing. A 6WD can have the same speed as an 8WD, or faster or slower, based solely on gearing.

Why do some wheels get dropped lower? If you've ever tried a 4WD non-omni, long configuration on carpet, you may have noticed that they bounce whenever they turn. This is due to the long wheelbase and relatively high traction. 6WD and 8WD have the same problem unless the center wheels are dropped, effectively shortening the wheelbase.

6WD with omnis on the corners vs 6WD with traction on the corners: Use caution. Personally, I'd go with high traction in the center and lower-traction (possibly omni) on the corners. If you're doing omnis, you can do a flat drive instead of a drop-center drive. If you're using traction, you'll want the drop.

8WD: Anything I've said about 6WD applies to the 8WD as well, except that the 8WD can be a little more forgiving in handling and dealing with obstacles and a little less forgiving when building, depending on exact type.

The dropped center is not just for the terrain. One of the most-copied drivetrains is the West Coast Drive, a 6WD drop-center cantilevered live-axle pioneered by teams 254 and 60 in 2004. As explained above, the drop is necessary for smooth turning.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2011, 17:32
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is online now
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,718
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

Six wheel drive, six traction wheels, the center wheel dropped 1/8" is in my opinion the best "all around" drivetrain in FRC. Unlike an omni-based six wheel drive, it's relatively hard to spin, but can still spin itself.

8 wheel drive uses the same principles as six wheel drive, just lowering two wheels instead of one. It's really about the same, albeit heavier.

I do wish to caution that 67's drive was designed for the very specific requirements of climbing the bumps and that many features in your design would be unnecessary without them.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2011, 17:38
Bjenks548's Avatar
Bjenks548 Bjenks548 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Brendan
FRC #0548 (Robostangs)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Northville
Posts: 354
Bjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

I believe that 67s drive train appeared to dominate was due to a few things.
-Ability to go over the bump
-Fit under the tunnel
-Had great manipulators accompanying it
-Great drivers and coaches
-I think i heard at Kettering that their entire robot only weighted 90lbs allowing them to accelerate faster then the 120lb bots
__________________
Toronto Regional quarter finalists. Northville Winners/ Chairman's Winners. Troy Finalist/ GM Industrial Design Award. Michigan State Championship Finalists. CMP Newton Division winners! Triple Balance count 13. Thanks to 1075, 4307, 67, 3656, 217, 2604, 2054, 245, 118, and 2194! Photo credit for my avatar Dan Ernst


  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2011, 17:43
Eugene Fang's Avatar
Eugene Fang Eugene Fang is offline
The Blue Alliance
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Bay Area, CA -> Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 772
Eugene Fang has a reputation beyond reputeEugene Fang has a reputation beyond reputeEugene Fang has a reputation beyond reputeEugene Fang has a reputation beyond reputeEugene Fang has a reputation beyond reputeEugene Fang has a reputation beyond reputeEugene Fang has a reputation beyond reputeEugene Fang has a reputation beyond reputeEugene Fang has a reputation beyond reputeEugene Fang has a reputation beyond reputeEugene Fang has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

I don't know about other teams, but we chose to do a 8wd instead of our usual 6wd because, through our prototyping tests, we found that the 8wd traversed the bump much more smoothly. If the field was completely flat, we would have used the 6wd over the 8wd.
__________________
Eugene Fang
2010 Silicon Valley Regional Dean's List Finalist

Various FLL Teams - Student (2000-2006), Mentor (2007-2010)
FRC Team 604 - Student (2007-2010), Mentor/Remote Advisor (2011-2015)
FRC Team 1323 - Mentor/Remote Advisor (2011-2014)

The Blue Alliance | TBA GameDay | TBA Android App
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2011, 17:49
BJC's Avatar
BJC BJC is offline
Simplicity is Complicated!
AKA: Bryan Culver
FRC #0033 (The Killer Bees)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Kettering/Greenville
Posts: 707
BJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond reputeBJC has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

First off, There is alot of past discussion on this and similar topics. Even So..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangel(kf7fdb) View Post
Team 842 has been thinking of future drive trains recently and here are some of our ideas.

One design is a 6 wheel drive consisting of 2 super shifters in the center of our robot belted up to omnis in the front and back and a center traction wheel. We are also considering replacing the omnis with the same traction wheels used in the center. What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this?
6WD: Probably the most commonly used drivetrain (excluding some years with terrain.) This drivetrain is generally liked because it strikes a good balence between everything you want in a drivetrain and is easy to build.

Omnis on the front and back lead to really nice turning. There also is no rock in the chassis because the middle wheel does not need to be lowered. However, most people use all traction wheels. When all the wheels have traction, however, the middle wheels have to be dropped about 1/8". This shortens your wheels base (only four wheels are touching at a time) and allows turning while still being able to hold your own in a pushing match. If well built, a all traction wheel drive can be made to turn just as well or better than its omni counterpart. However, be warned if you're using the KoP chassis or another semi-flexable chassis you need to watch out for the opposite outer wheels bending down and scrubbing the ground. This is more of a problem when going fast (like Overdrive 2008) but can still make turning a bit of a chore at lower speeds too if your chassis is to flexable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangel(kf7fdb) View Post
8WD
Our 8 wheel drive train idea is entirely based off team 67's drive train. From what I have seen this past year, this drive train seemed to dominate all others. What makes this such a good drive train?
8wd: This functions similarly to the all traction 6wd above with the 4 inner wheels lowered. It has a shorter wheel base then the above (1/3 the wheel base of a 4wd as opposed to 1/2 the wheel base with the 6wd) and a central axis of turning. It's much more stable because it doesn't rock back and forth like a 6wd. It is also much better at climbing (making it the choice of many top notch teams in 2010). However, the advantages come at a price. It is both heaver and more complex.

As to 67 having a dominate drivetrain. I wouldn't say that. 67 has built a completly different chassis for every year they have been with FIRST; their drivetrain was good, but not the best. The reason they look dominate is.. well, they are! They have AMAZING drivers! This is the result lots and lots of practice and drills with their practice robot. Team 67 would be awesome even if they were driving a tin can!

If you need an example of a really well thought out drivetrain that has been boiled down to (imo) near perfection, look up team 254. They have a set chassis design they make better every year. (and they've been at it for a long time)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangel(kf7fdb) View Post
A few questions we have are what are the pros and cons of both of these drive trains and which one would be faster and which one would have more traction. I mean this on flat carpet by the way. I also have one other question, why is it that some wheels get lower? Is it only because there was a bump in last years game? One more question, what are the advantages of using the different size wheels in the 8 wheel drive train idea. If you have any ideas on how to improve these drive trains it would be greatly appreciated.
Answering the questions above:
Outer Wheels are raised to prevent the outer wheels from rubbing on the carpet making turning difficult for the robot. Speed is relative, as are torque and acceleration. No wheel base is inhearently faster than any other; it's motor dependent. Different sizes of wheels have some various pros and cons. Larger wheels go faster than smaller wheels with the same gear ratios. However, smaller wheels are theoretically more efficent. Larger wheels don't where out as fast as smaller wheels. An 8" wheel wears half as fast as a 4" wheel. However, smaller wheels are lighter in weight. There is endless tradeoffs, one is not a naturally better choice than the other. Again, go look at 254's drivetrain.

Good Luck, Bryan
__________________
robot robot robot? Robot. Robot? Robot!
-----------------Team 33------------------
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2011, 00:31
Grim Tuesday's Avatar
Grim Tuesday Grim Tuesday is offline
Registered User
AKA: Simon Bohn
FRC #0639 (Code Red)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Baltimore MD (JHU)
Posts: 1,606
Grim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

I dont know if anyone saw 610's 2010 drive. It was a 6 wheel, but the middle wheels were mobile (I dont know the details), so that they could either move the wheel up or down to traverse bumps. It was amazing.

  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2011, 01:56
Basel A's Avatar
Basel A Basel A is online now
It's pronounced Basl with a soft s
AKA: @BaselThe2nd
FRC #3322 (Eagle Imperium)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 1,933
Basel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

Related question: Other things being the same, does 8wd tUrn easier than 6wd? I would assume so because when movng the wheelbase is decreased to 1/3 of total length, as opposed to 1/2 for a 6wd. Is this correct?
__________________
Team 2337 | 2009-2012 | Student
Team 3322 | 2014-Present | College Student
“Be excellent in everything you do and the results will just happen.”
-Paul Copioli
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2011, 02:04
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is online now
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,718
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Basel A View Post
Related question: Other things being the same, does 8wd tUrn easier than 6wd? I would assume so because when movng the wheelbase is decreased to 1/3 of total length, as opposed to 1/2 for a 6wd. Is this correct?
All other things equal, it both turns more easily and is turned more easily. The effect IMO is slight.

However, 6wd "mid rock" when resting between its outer wheels (only on the middle 2) has no resistance to turning. I have no idea if this phenomenon actually happens during a 6wd turn or not.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)

Last edited by Chris is me : 06-01-2011 at 02:09.
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2011, 02:31
Aren Siekmeier's Avatar
Aren Siekmeier Aren Siekmeier is offline
on walkabout
FRC #2175 (The Fighting Calculators)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: 대한민국
Posts: 735
Aren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond reputeAren Siekmeier has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
However, 6wd "mid rock" when resting between its outer wheels (only on the middle 2) has no resistance to turning. I have no idea if this phenomenon actually happens during a 6wd turn or not.
It does if the weight is distributed equally between the front and the back. We got pretty close to this on our 2010 'bot, which is pretty maneuverable. It's not a problem in a pushing match, because the pushing robot will tend to throw you off the delicate balance and back onto 4 wheels where you aren't turned as easily.

From that logic, I would say that drop center 8wd is even harder to be turned (by another robot) because it's highly unlikely (pretty much impossible) that you would stay on two wheels. On the other hand, it might be harder to turn yourself for the same reason. I think...
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2011, 02:32
gilkeedman gilkeedman is offline
Team captain/Pneumatics/Mechanics
AKA: Gil 'Dil Tedem' Kedem
FRC #2630 (Thunderbolts)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 28
gilkeedman is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

from my past experience I can say that if you want your robot to have a good maneuverability the best way to do it is with "west coast drive".
If you do it with 8WD it would be better than with 6WD.

Sorry if I had misspellings
__________________
2007 - Israeli regional FLL team member, 2008 - Fomula Green-8075 FLL team member, Israel's champions
2009 - Israel FLL referee and Thunderbolts team member
2010 - Thunderbolts, Israeli regional champions, Curie semifinals
2011 - Thunderbolts captain

Thunderbolts 2630 website!!
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2011, 08:16
thefro526's Avatar
thefro526 thefro526 is offline
Mentor for Hire.
AKA: Dustin Benedict
no team (EWCP, MAR, FRC 708)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,599
thefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to thefro526 Send a message via MSN to thefro526
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
All other things equal, it both turns more easily and is turned more easily. The effect IMO is slight.

However, 6wd "mid rock" when resting between its outer wheels (only on the middle 2) has no resistance to turning. I have no idea if this phenomenon actually happens during a 6wd turn or not.
This phenomenon does in fact happen with some machines.

Our 2008 robot would often get spun around if we were hit while turning at a high speed. It was 6WD with approximately 15" effective wheel base (distance between the wheels that were driven on, either middle to front, or middle to center.)

One of the quirks I've noticed about 6WD's is that the driving wheels can change depending on the game and manipulator placement. Again, our 2008 robot would go from driving on the rear 4 wheels to driving on the front 4 wheels once we picked up a track ball. This wasn't really an issue because it gave us a point of rotation that was more around the center point of our robot and trackball, but I would imagine that this could get annoying with another game piece depending on the manipulator.

8WD's rotate a bit differently than 6WD's. The point of rotation is almost always in the center of the robot, and they often rotate more easily than a 6WD depending on what the center wheel base is. Personally I prefer driving 6WD over 8WD because I find them to be more stable.
__________________
-Dustin Benedict
2005-2012 - Student & Mentor FRC 816
2012-2014 - Technical Mentor, 2014 Drive Coach FRC 341
Current - Mentor FRC 2729, FRC 708
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2011, 10:34
ttldomination's Avatar
ttldomination ttldomination is offline
Sunny
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Roanoke, TX
Posts: 2,066
ttldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond reputettldomination has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

Quote:
Originally Posted by gilkeedman View Post
from my past experience I can say that if you want your robot to have a good maneuverability the best way to do it is with "west coast drive".
Just because someone uses a west coast drive, this does not mean that they will have the best drive train.

I've seem teams have beastly drive trains, 1771, 1114, etc. and they use the non WCD style of the drive train.

- Sunny
__________________
1261: 2007-2012
1648: 2013-2014
5283: 2015
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2011, 10:38
Brandon Holley's Avatar
Brandon Holley Brandon Holley is offline
Chase perfection. Catch excellence.
AKA: Let's bring CD back to the way it used to be
FRC #0125 (NU-TRONs, Team #11 Alumni (GO MORT))
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,593
Brandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Holley has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Brandon Holley
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

Quote:
Originally Posted by ttldomination View Post
Just because someone uses a west coast drive, this does not mean that they will have the best drive train.

I've seem teams have beastly drive trains, 1771, 1114, etc. and they use the non WCD style of the drive train.

- Sunny
Bolded for emphasis.

Drivetrain performance always comes down to execution (as it does with most other items on the robot). To say one drive train is "best", is unwise because every team has their own set of requirements to work within. Some teams have the ability to build beautiful sheetmetal sculptures, while others use wood or kit frames because it works best within their team.

The key to a great drivetrain is to design the details in, and learn from yours and others past mistakes. From there, whatever style of drivetrain you choose will work for you, but keep in mind JVN's addage "Know Thyself"...

-Brando
__________________
MORT (Team 11) '01-'05 :
-2005 New Jersey Regional Chairman's Award Winners
-2013 MORT Hall of Fame Inductee

NUTRONs (Team 125) '05-???
2007 Boston Regional Winners
2008 & 2009 Boston Regional Driving Tomorrow's Technology Award
2010 Boston Regional Creativity Award
2011 Bayou Regional Finalists, Innovation in Control Award, Boston Regional Finalists, Industrial Design Award
2012 New York City Regional Winners, Boston Regional Finalists, IRI Mentor of the Year
2013 Orlando Regional Finalists, Industrial Design Award, Boston Regional Winners, Pine Tree Regional Finalists
2014 Rhode Island District Winners, Excellence in Engineering Award, Northeastern University District Winners, Industrial Design Award, Pine Tree District Chairman's Award, Pine Tree District Winners
2015 South Florida Regional Chairman's Award, NU District Winners, NEDCMP Industrial Design Award, Hopper Division Finalists, Hopper/Newton Gracious Professionalism Award
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2011, 11:09
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is online now
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,634
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: 6WD vs 8WD

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjenks548 View Post
I believe that 67s drive train appeared to dominate was due to a few things.
-Ability to go over the bump
-Fit under the tunnel
-Had great manipulators accompanying it
-Great drivers and coaches
-I think i heard at Kettering that their entire robot only weighted 90lbs allowing them to accelerate faster then the 120lb bots
Before we get carried away, let's examine this statement.

Let's start with the simple equation F=ma. Based on this, when you reduce your weight (and consequently mass) and keep your force the same, your acceleration should increase (which agrees with the bolded statement). However, when examined further, we find that the force does not always remain constant in the FRC world when your mass changes.
The force we're speaking about in this application is the force exerted by the drive wheels. This is limited by friction between the wheel surface and the playing surface. The frictional force is calculated as Ff=μN, where μ is the coefficient of friction and N is the normal force. Subbing this back into the first equation, we now have:
μN=ma
In most situations, the normal force is going to be a function of the mass, usually just N=mg when on a flat surface. Putting this back into the previous equation we have:
μmg=ma
Which simplifies to:
μg=a
In other words, in friction limited drivetrains (ie drive systems that have enough torque to "spin out" their wheels), acceleration is not governed by the mass of the robot, as the mass plays into both sides of the equation.

Last edited by Lil' Lavery : 06-01-2011 at 11:44.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What does it take 6WD/8WD to be successful? TEE Technical Discussion 26 06-05-2010 08:30
pic: Rastogi 8wd Iteration 1.2 Akash Rastogi Extra Discussion 56 05-05-2010 15:16
pic: Sheetmetal 8wd Akash Rastogi Extra Discussion 16 02-05-2010 15:38
pic: Concept 8wd Drivetrain sdcantrell56 Technical Discussion 77 25-11-2008 23:05
8WD drivetrain? David Sherman Technical Discussion 16 09-04-2006 17:32


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:54.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi