|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
thank you. do you have any experience programming the VEX bots with labview?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
Actually, it looks like I was wrong. A quick Google says there is no easy way to use LabVIEW with VEX. It looks like your options are RobotC or EasyC, at least one of which I assume will be with the software.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
Is RobotC or EasyC based off of C/C++ or something? Does anyone have an example of a program source code in that language?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
From an FTC website: http://sites.google.com/site/ftciowacoaches/software
'The LEGO NXT bricks can run on one of three software programs: NXT-G, LabView or RobotC. However, to compete in an FTC competition, teams must use LabView or RobotC.' I understand RobotC is text-based; NXT-G is a simple visual LabVIEW-type language but not allowed in FTC. Good Q for Wednesday: does the FTC programming rule apply, or can we program in NXT-G? The Oregon FTC/FLL website ORTOP also has info. http://www.ortop.org/ftc/ |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
Is there any real advantage to having code on the minibot?
Because everyone knows that code just ads excessive weight. Would a bot that would just start when it knows the pole is there work better than something that the drivers would have to control? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
software, or code, has no weight. for any robot to move, it needs code. otherwise, to get it running would be direct control between motor wires and battery, which is illegal
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
Are you sure? Why couldn't one simply leave it running forward, until it hits a switch, then drive in reverse? (Assuming they don't have to stay at the top)
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
Quote:
plus, that means your minibot would be running the entire autonomous and teleop match, leaving no battery life left Last edited by TJ Cawley : 08-01-2011 at 19:57. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
Can you cite the specific rule that forbids this please?
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
I could not find a specific rule on this, so it MAY be legal, but if your minibot runs the entire match, you have no power when you need it to climb the last 10 seconds
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
the game manuel seems to be alittle on the vague side towards these minibots. how do we control them!
The FTC mini-kit from FIRST Choice, does that include 'everything' to make a minibot? If we use an NXT with this 'mini-kit', is it a functioning minibot? |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
not necessarily, you could have a three way switch that connects the battery directly to the motor forward, backwards, and off, and the main robot could turn it on, deploy it, it would hit the top, flipping the switch, sending it in reverse. No wasted battery, no code
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
Quote:
Even if you left it always on, I don't think ~4 mins will kill the battery. Then again, I don't know the life of these batteries. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
The NXT may be programmed in LabVIEW. There are libraries available, and it is easier to program then the cRIO. FRCmastery.com is the sister to FTCmastery.com. There are videos and help on both sites.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2011 Logomotion Mini Bots
I was thinking about this same issue. Wouldn't sapping power from the main robot to power the minibot eliminate the need to place batteries on the minibot? The rule people on our team are still looking this up, but still would be a good idea if legal (minimum code if at all, and super light).
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|