Role of Analyst

[Koko Ed]

Originally Posted by Waffles

Sometimes. Although, an extra set of eyes doesn't hurt.

Three coaches should be more than enough.
You only get two minutes to do what you gotta do so you need to be decisive and precise. One coach on the alliance should be the one making the final strategy decisions and the other two should be doing their part. Human Players should stick to delivering the good and nothing more.
You get too many people talking and it just becomes noise.

[Tetraman]

It's the question of "What do we do with the third Human Player". If you are scoring on the second stage pegs, you will be reducing your vision. Might be nice to have another set of eyes.

[Lil' Lavery]

Originally Posted by Koko Ed

Three coaches should be more than enough.
You only get two minutes to do what you gotta do so you need to be decisive and precise. One coach on the alliance should be the one making the final strategy decisions and the other two should be doing their part. Human Players should stick to delivering the good and nothing more.
You get too many people talking and it just becomes noise.

Because your way to run an alliance is the best?

[Koko Ed]

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery

Because your way to run an alliance is the best?

Because a human player on our alliance told his driver to go get in the red zone where we playing defense in the finals of our regional. They flipped over and got us a red card and cost us a match.
Human players should not be making decisions. Coaches should be making decisions.

[Lil' Lavery]

Originally Posted by Koko Ed

Because a human player on our alliance told his driver to go get in the red zone where we playing defense in the finals of our regional. They flipped over and got us a red card and cost us a match.
Human players should not be making decisions. Coaches should be making decisions.

What's so sacred about the coaching position? If an analyst or human player is trained effectively and ready to make decisions, let them make decisions. Sounds to me it was just a case of that human player not being prepared properly to make that call, not an indictment of all human players' decision making abilities.

[XaulZan11]

I just think they needed something for the 3rd human player to do so they gave them a special title. In nearly all cases, I would put the 'best/brightest/most experienced' human players on the job of distributing the game pieces on the field. Having a human player that is smart enough to know when and which peice to through out will be critical.

[BJC]

I think the sad truth about this position is that the person will often be ignored by the other teams on the alliance unless an understanding is reached before the match begins.

Ex: A rookie team's human player has the position. They're going to have a hard time telling the big powerhouse team to do something different from what they already are. The truth of it is that the older veteran team probably knows best, and is already doing it. What does the Analyst do then?

Your alliance should have your entire game stratigy worked out before the match anyways. You should never be figuring out what to do while your suppost to be doing it.

However, as long as teams cooperate and come to an understanding before the match, I think the role has some promise (and importance).

[jtechau]

One thought is that the Analyst is on the same side of the field with the rest of the alliance, whereas the Feeders are on the opposite end. The analyst could thus provide communication between drivers and feeders. Without communication, the feeders will have to just guess which type of tube to feed, etc.

[nighterfighter]

Originally Posted by jtechau

Without communication, the feeders will have to just guess which type of tube to feed, etc.

Well, the feeders CAN see what shapes are up on their pegs, and make a conclusion with that.

I think it will be more important for the 2 human players to communicate what each other is putting out!

[Tetraman]

Originally Posted by jtechau

One thought is that the Analyst is on the same side of the field with the rest of the alliance, whereas the Feeders are on the opposite end. The analyst could thus provide communication between drivers and feeders. Without communication, the feeders will have to just guess which type of tube to feed, etc.

Yea. Your alliance will want to discuss the use of hand signs to signal what kind of tube the feeders need to pass out.

Maybe like, holding a fist up in the air is a Circle. Holding a flat hand upward would be a square and two hands up making a triangle would be a triangle.

[IndySam]

Extra coach no, but a set of eyes to help keep track of the pegs (especially the opposing alliances) will be very valuable.

[Chris is me]

Keep in mind there may be OTHER ways for you to communicate what tube you want from an HP. Say, some kind of indicator on your robot. White light = white tube?

[$wimmer3138]

Originally Posted by Chris is me

White light = white tube?

We are giving great consideration to this method to comunicate exactly what tube we would like.

[Grim Tuesday]

Originally Posted by Koko Ed

Because a human player on our alliance told his driver to go get in the red zone where we playing defense in the finals of our regional. They flipped over and got us a red card and cost us a match.
Human players should not be making decisions. Coaches should be making decisions.

I remember that, always wondered about the reasoning there. 610 was an amazing robot, I always thought your alliance should have won FLR.

Anyways, the issue with your argument, is that you consider the analyst another human player. Which they are not. They are a new position, with new responsibilities imbued. We will just have to wait and see how they play out. If they end up being detrimental to the team, just have them sit in the corner for the duration of the match, or don't listen to what they say.

[Waffles]

I think, that the Analyst might be MOST helpful with assisting the drivers as far as the placing order of the game pieces is to form the logo sequence(since it's mirrored).

That way, the coach can still keep their eyes on the field action.

This is actually ALSO beneficial where rookie members and coaches alike can all learn from eachother, so they get a training session.

(That's not to say there wasn't coach learning BEFORE the analyst position)

Just saying that coach training is now two for one with whoever is the analyst.

I like the twist of the human players needing to be able to not only just play the role of feeding, but also the coach component. Makes things a little more... crazy.