Go to Post sometimes you have to put up with the rain to see the rainbow - Beth Sweet [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 21:57
Tbush173's Avatar
Tbush173 Tbush173 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Travis Bush
FRC #0173 (RAGE)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 8
Tbush173 is on a distinguished road
Possable strategy for high ranking points

Hello, I am a FIRST Alumni who is now mentoring my former team while attending college. (Just thought I'd introduce myself as I've never been very active on Chief Delphi) Anyways, I was scrutinizing this years game manual when I discovered a strategy that may help both alliances in a match when it comes to gaining ranking points. For those who don't know, your ranking score is determined by the losing alliances score. The winning alliance receives the losing alliances score before penalties, and the losing alliance receives their own score after penalties. Now this is intended to encourage teams to not play defense on the opposing alliance as their score could determine your rank. I think we can take it a step further and have both alliances help each other out so that both alliances can receive high scores and the winner/loser will be irrelevant as the win/lose record has no bearing on your rank.

Now, the layout of the field is such that your alliances scoring zone is right in front of your drivers station, and your feeder station and towers are on the opposite side of the field. This will tend to create a collision zone in the center of the field where robots from either alliance will have to navigate past each other in order to get to their respective feeder stations. The only other option is to throw the tubes from the feeder station as far as you can to your own scoring zone and hope that your robot gets to it before your opponents do.

I have an alternate strategy that will change everything. Talk with your opposing alliance and make the following agreement: to have your alliance's feeders feed tubes to the opposing alliance. I can think of no reason why anyone would not accept this agreement. If you tell your feeders to feed tubes to your opponents and your opponents decide not to feed tubes to your side, that would only mean that they win, but receive your alliances low score as ranking points due to the fact that they had no tubes to hang. If both sides tell their feeders to feed tubes to the opposing alliance, then both scores will be higher than if feeders feed tubes to their own alliance. Even if you lose, your ranking score will still be higher than if your hadn't made the agreement.

Edit: Sorry, this is not a viable strategy as Win/lose record determines your rank ahead of ranking points. I apologize for any confusion this may have caused.

Last edited by Tbush173 : 09-01-2011 at 22:13.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 22:00
Grim Tuesday's Avatar
Grim Tuesday Grim Tuesday is offline
Registered User
AKA: Simon Bohn
FRC #0639 (Code Red)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Baltimore MD (JHU)
Posts: 1,607
Grim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Possable strategy for high ranking points

Are you sure you aren't reading the 2010 manual? This year is Win-Loss-Tie.

Or am I feeding the trolls?
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 22:00
ATannahill ATannahill is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alex Tannahill
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Southfield, Michigan
Posts: 3,259
ATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond reputeATannahill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Possable strategy for high ranking points

I see a big red light on this idea.

Teams are first sorted by qualification points. You get 2 for winning, 1 for tieing and 0 for loseing. Ranking points are there to break ties.
__________________

- Arizona North
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 22:03
Sean Raia's Avatar
Sean Raia Sean Raia is offline
Curious spectator & alumn
no team
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 436
Sean Raia has a reputation beyond reputeSean Raia has a reputation beyond reputeSean Raia has a reputation beyond reputeSean Raia has a reputation beyond reputeSean Raia has a reputation beyond reputeSean Raia has a reputation beyond reputeSean Raia has a reputation beyond reputeSean Raia has a reputation beyond reputeSean Raia has a reputation beyond reputeSean Raia has a reputation beyond reputeSean Raia has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Possable strategy for high ranking points

Teams may end up doing this, but i think the judges/other teams may frown upon this. It doesn't seem like the spirit of FIRST to me.

Edit: Whoops, looks like it wouldn't work anyway.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 22:03
KrazyCarl92's Avatar
KrazyCarl92 KrazyCarl92 is online now
Registered User
AKA: Carl Springli
FRC #5811 (The BONDS)(EWCP)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 521
KrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Possable strategy for high ranking points

This is all based on the false presumption that your your rank is determined by your ranking score. It is determined by your qualification score. Ranking score is what you are talking about. Qualification score is 2 points for a win, 1 for a tie, 0 for a loss. Ranking Score is the tie-breaker.
__________________
[2017-present] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
[2016] FRC 5811 - BONDS Robotics
[2010-2015] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers

Last edited by KrazyCarl92 : 09-01-2011 at 22:04. Reason: weird sentence
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 22:05
Tbush173's Avatar
Tbush173 Tbush173 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Travis Bush
FRC #0173 (RAGE)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 8
Tbush173 is on a distinguished road
Re: Possable strategy for high ranking points

I appolagize for this tread, I should have read the manual more thourghly.
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 22:06
Robert103's Avatar
Robert103 Robert103 is offline
Rob Small
FRC #0103 (Cybersonics)
Team Role: Scout
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Kintnersville
Posts: 36
Robert103 is a splendid one to beholdRobert103 is a splendid one to beholdRobert103 is a splendid one to beholdRobert103 is a splendid one to beholdRobert103 is a splendid one to beholdRobert103 is a splendid one to beholdRobert103 is a splendid one to beholdRobert103 is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Robert103
Re: Possable strategy for high ranking points

It should stay in the back of your mind though that defense during qualification matches may not be as important as in finals matches. Letting the other alliance score during qualifications may be a good thing, if only to break the tie, of course.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 22:06
ahollenbach ahollenbach is offline
Registered User
AKA: Andrew
FRC #0103 (Cybersonics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Kintnersville
Posts: 52
ahollenbach is a name known to allahollenbach is a name known to allahollenbach is a name known to allahollenbach is a name known to allahollenbach is a name known to allahollenbach is a name known to all
Re: Possable strategy for high ranking points

Check out 5.3.3 and 5.3.7
In summation, they state that qualification ranking is first and foremost obtained via a 2 point win, 1 point tie, and 0 point loss. The team with the highest number of points will be seeded first.
If there is a tie (e.g. two times have 4 wins, 2 ties and 0 losses, totaling 10 qualification points), then it goes to Ranking Score, which is what you are talking about. So it is helpful to avoid the other alliance, to an extent.
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 22:07
Jeff Rodriguez Jeff Rodriguez is offline
Too young to be an 'old guy'
FRC #0155 (Technonuts)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Newington, CT
Posts: 1,943
Jeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Rodriguez has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Jeff Rodriguez Send a message via Yahoo to Jeff Rodriguez
Re: Possable strategy for high ranking points

<G33>Neither ROBOTS, HOSTBOTS, nor MINIBOTS may break the planes of the vertically projected borders of the opponent’s LANES.. Violation: PENALTY


You can't enter, reach over, or get near the other teams FEEDER STATIONS.
__________________
173, student: 1999-2002
173, mentor: 2005-2010
155, teacher: 2011-
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2011, 22:11
Tbush173's Avatar
Tbush173 Tbush173 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Travis Bush
FRC #0173 (RAGE)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 8
Tbush173 is on a distinguished road
Re: Possable strategy for high ranking points

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Rodriguez View Post
<G33>Neither ROBOTS, HOSTBOTS, nor MINIBOTS may break the planes of the vertically projected borders of the opponent’s LANES.. Violation: PENALTY


You can't enter, reach over, or get near the other teams FEEDER STATIONS.
I actually meant that the feeders could throw the tubes into the opposing alliances scoring zone, but the strategy is not viable anyways because win/lose record determines rank before ranking points
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:35.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi