|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
for example, the first one is: A 16.875" [428.6 mm] segment on top 1 B 14.125" [358.8 mm] pegs 3 C 35.25" [895.4 mm] between the two pairs of pegs 2 D 37.375" [949.3 mm] lower segment to the floor 1 From this you can get very close to the heights involved. However, the dimensions of the T-fittings used to make the assembly will affect the heights slightly. That is, the vertical segments are not strictly additive. Not a plumbing nightmare at all. Last edited by Bill_B : 09-01-2011 at 19:53. |
|
#33
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
Also, Team 2 did not force Team 1 to push them in. Team 1 did not go around them when they had the option. No penalty either way. |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
The penalty wouldn't come from <G61>, but <G61> does state that "any rule violations committed by the affected ALLIANCE shall be excused", which would include the violation of <G61> that negated the first penalty.
The second bit of your response is a more direct reply to my question. "Is it the defender's fault for getting in the way or the scorer's fault for not going around?" was a pretty major point of contention last year and I want to get it cleared up early. |
|
#35
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
Good defense: getting to where your opponent wants to go and trying to keep them out. Great offense: Going to where you want to go despite any defense, doing what you were going to do there, and doing it again. |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by bassoondude : 09-01-2011 at 21:17. |
|
#37
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
That is what that question is asking. Remember, minibots have zero connection to the field controller, so they aren't shut off when the robots are. |
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
Acctually, <R34> specifically allows for batteries integral to COTS computing devices, with the example of laptop batteries given. <R35> reenforces this rule by making an exception for "a battery contained in a COTS computing device" I think it would be the same for the NXT, since it is a COTS computing device. |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
After the initial 3-point penalty for breaking the plane of an opponent's zone, is there any penalty for remaining in the zone? Could a team take the three-point penalty and then remain in the zone indefinitely to run interference on scoring robots?
|
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
![]() |
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
![]() |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Proposed question:
Is it legal to create a pressure vessle out of the alloted "Aluminum sheet, 90* angle, u-channel, tube, bar" listed in <R92> H to act as a "rocket" propelling the minibot up? Anyone remember the good old days playing with bottle rockets out of old soda bottles? -Matthew |
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
|
|
#45
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
I don't know what question number we're at, but add:
--- how big is the playing configuration sizing cylinder - 60" or 84" ? --- can a tube intentionally be placed over the minibot tower? --- does making a logo also double the score of any ubertubes under that logo? Last edited by GaryVoshol : 10-01-2011 at 08:06. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|