|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
I've just looked at the manual about the Robot and although it speaks of the "Bumper Zone" I have not found where it describes where the actual bumper zone is. Is this in a revised manual?
bhenze@sapulpaps.org |
|
#47
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
|
|
#48
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
More questions:
--- Are penalties called when you commit an action against another robot in your own alliance? Examples: pinning, taking away a piece that is in possession, touching a partner that is deploying, etc. --- Who records the coopertition points? How does anyone know if a scoring minibot has been loaned by another team? --- Does <R14> have any exemptions for fastener heads? Last edited by GaryVoshol : 11-01-2011 at 08:18. |
|
#49
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Updating the list to reflect TU#1.
Quote:
Last edited by EricH : 12-01-2011 at 01:16. |
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
What are the exceptions for objects/manipulators passing through the Bumper Zone?:
a) Is it legal for an arm to enter the bumper zone and not be protected by bumpers b) Assuming (a) is legal, what if the object entering the bumper zone is not intended to manipulate a game piece (ex. wheels to support a larger structure which deploys from the starting configuration at some point during the match) I (and a few other people here) have not found any rules that grant exceptions for manipulators (or anything else) to enter the bumper zone without bumpers appearing out of thin air. Also #9 was addressed in TU#1 as well (it does not) |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
Last edited by DavidGitz : 12-01-2011 at 09:05. |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
I have another question.
How many licenses do we have for inventor this year in our kit of parts? |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Concerning "3) If a minibot is moving upwards at the end of a match, does it still get the 10 seconds to finish for points?"
From the blue box of <G02>: Quote:
|
|
#54
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
If the GDC comes out and says that the minibots have to pass FTC inspection, the uproar over requiring the FTC motors for vertical motion will be as nothing compared to the ensuing "virtual riots". FYI: FTC inspection != Minibot inspection. Minibot inspection will check for size, weight, and legal parts. I'm sure FTC inspection is a bit more rigorous. |
|
#55
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
The only way to resolve this is by asking them and pointing out the contradiction. |
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
|
|
#57
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
1) Minibots at the top of the pole: Do they have to stay there until after the match, or can they slide down during/after the match under their own power or via gravity to make retrieval easier?
2) Are you allowed to move your own tubes, other than ubertubes, around after they are in scoring position? 3) If a minibot is moving upwards at the end of a match, does it still get the 10 seconds to finish for points? 4) Assuming an NXT is used, are the internal batteries allowed power sources? 5) Wiring rules/conventions/schematics for Minibot--where are they, if there are any? 6) What methods are acceptable for removing the Minibot from the post? For example, could it drive itself down autonomously? Could someone bring a long pole out and activate something on the robot to make it come down? 7) For determination of "above the line" during deployment, is the top of the Minibot supposed to be below the line, or just the hostbot device? 8) Pneumatics rules are unclear: How many and what type of a) storage tanks, b) cylinders, and c) other pneumatic actuators are allowed to be used on a robot? 9) Can a tube intentionally be placed over the minibot tower? 10) Who records the coopertition points? How does anyone know if a scoring minibot has been loaned by another team? 11) Does <R14> have any exemptions for fastener heads? 12) What are the exceptions for objects/manipulators passing through the Bumper Zone?: a) Is it legal for an arm to enter the bumper zone and not be protected by bumpers? b) Assuming (a) is legal, what if the object entering the bumper zone is not intended to manipulate a game piece (ex. wheels to support a larger structure which deploys from the starting configuration at some point during the match)? |
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
I realize that it's not a rule. However, I see no discrepency. Let's say they wait for the minibots to stop moving, and one of them hits the target. Correct me if I'm wrong, but <G68> says that scores will be tabulated after 10 seconds, not necessarily that all methods of scoring are available after 10 seconds, so I think that the minibot triggering the tower would not score.
I suppose that it could be misinterpreted, so we should ask the Q&A, but I would be surprised if they allowed minibots to score after the clock runs out. Quote:
|
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
Does the offense bot need to back up quickly and allow the defense robot to quickly exit the offense zone on the path it came in (assuming it can move in that direction) and would remain blocking the offensive bot's path into the zone? (Thus, the defense bot "wins") Or if the offensive robot does not back up but just waits, then is the Defensive robot going to be penalized for not clearing out of the offensive zone by skirting around the offense bot? (Thus, the offense bot "wins") I expect this Sumo confrontation to happen quite often and the rules are not clear to as to obligations of the two opponents involved after the zone line is crossed by the defense bot under the pushing of the offense bot. I'm not sure what the GDC has in mind for this one. Typically, questions are ruled with deference to offense. But I think this one is tricky. I'm curious if there is an obvious answer in the manual or from previous years. Last edited by boomergeek : 12-01-2011 at 20:13. |
|
#60
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FAQ for Q&A
Quote:
There are two ways to look at this, and both have valid points. That's why it's one for Q&A. boomer, I'll answer as best I can. 1) Nope, unless it's pinning. 2) Depends on maneuvering. If it clearly has the opportunity to try to exit and does not, then penalties would probably be thrown. However, if it's getting pushed around by the offense robot who is trying to score over it, no penalty (again, it's being forced into the situation). If you're the defense robot in this position, you need to be attempting to get out if you can. If you're not, the refs would probably be justified in throwing a penalty. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|