|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Drivetrain First Thoughts?
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Drivetrain First Thoughts?
I mean that you lose energy through a vector other than forwards. Those mechanum rollers are rolling even when you're going straight, so you're losing energy and it could be taking you more wheel rotations to cover the same distance as a non mechanum wheel of the same diameter.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Drivetrain First Thoughts?
You can model a mecanum wheel as a regular wheel of the same diameter and tread material but with 71% the coefficient of friction (assuming 45 degree, friction-free rollers. In actuality, it is >71% for F/B and <71% for L/R due to friction.).
When you aren't slipping the wheel, you get the same speed out of a mecanum wheel as you would with a regular wheel of the same diameter. It is a common misconception (and one I had believed until recently) that a mecanum wheel is necessarily slower than any other wheel. See here for the math: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2390 |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Drivetrain First Thoughts?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Drivetrain First Thoughts?
Light cycle, anyone? Attach the arm mechanism to the center of the robot, in between wheels?
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Drivetrain First Thoughts?
Quote:
Mecanum wheels' rollers do spin when driving in a straight line on carpet. This robs them of forward speed. Perhaps on a rigid surface like tile or concrete the "just like a traction wheel" model is adequate, but it falls short on a typical FRC field. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|