Go to Post So measure not by the masses, but by the sparks that you generate. - Kims Robot [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Mecanum or 6WD
Mecanum 90 40.36%
6WD 133 59.64%
Voters: 223. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2011, 15:20
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,102
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mecanum or 6WD ...we're leaving something out

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_Alaniz View Post
Not to start an argument...
Not to worry. I welcome polite challenges.

Quote:
..but the white paper actually confirms what I was saying. In fact, it states in the body that "Therefore, assuming no roller bearing friction, the “pushing force” (and speed) of the vehicle is the same in the fore/aft and sideways directions."
The above statement is true, but it doesn't confirm what you said. You said:

Quote:
in any given direction, mechanums are the equivalent of the torque of TWO motors driving TWO wheels with the rollers locked
The above statement is not true.

Quote:
So I don't see how you got the 41% unless you are including friction from the bolt/axle but I would be happy to hear how you reached these conclusions.
The 41% increase is a factor of 1.41, which is 1/cos(45), 45 being the angle of the roller.

To summarize:

In the forward direction, the pushing force of a (4 motor) mecanum vehicle is the same whether the rollers are locked or not, assuming that the vehicle is not traction-limited.

If the mecanum vehicle is traction-limited, then the pushing force is reduced by a factor of 1.41. However, compared to TWO locked-roller wheels (which is the comparison you made), this would be 1.41 times larger:

(F/1.41)*2 = F*1.41

If this still isn't clear, I don't mind giving it another shot. Tell me which part doesn't make sense.


Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi