Go to Post I can tell you that I feel happiest when I am giving or doing for others. I do not expect anything in return but just knowing that I can make things better, in my small way, makes me happy. - Steve W [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2011, 23:31
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
FRC #1732
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,329
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Defense v Offense

Quote:
Originally Posted by Molten View Post
I recall team 48 had a pretty amazing defense robot a few years back. They had a powerful drive that could push just about any robot they wanted and a second gear for high speed maneuverability. It was clear they had no intentions of scoring as there wasn't the slightest hint of a manipulator on it. Truly great drive trains require alot of focus, and alot of weight. Anything put into a half-baked manipulator is taking away from your defensive capabilities. I agree that a great defensive robot+good manipulator=offensive powerhouse. I just don't agree that offensive powerhouse-good manipulator=great defensive robot. If a team were to have enough resources to fully devote themselves to both a manipulator and a drive and figure out the perfect balance of weight between them, it'd be amazing. I just don't see many teams that have that many students or mentors or time to do all that. Sometimes, it comes down to priorities and I just think people need to be clear to choose a priority rather then try for more then they can handle.
I would agree that 48 was an awesome defender in 2007. Them and 703 that year were the two best defensive robots I've seen. I could be wrong, but I think that 48 planned to have a tube manipulator but didn't get it done due to weight. I do know that was the case for 703 (I think there is a picture of them on CD with the beginning of their tube manipulator). I also think that 2007 was a little different as teams could earn points being ramps without touching any tube.

My point is that you rarely see a team that just planned to be a box bot be an amazing defender as its usally a traditionally good team that stuggles with their manipulator. 171 at Wisconsin was a perfect example of this last year. Although they planned to be a scorer, their kicker and lifter weren't quite perfected so they were smart enough to adapt and play to their strength, which was defense. Their strong 6 wheel drive shut down Wildstang in the semifinals. They did drastically improve their scoring, but they won a regional because their smart drivers and strong drivetrain allowed them to play fantastic defense.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi