|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Diffrences Of The 2009 Camera And 2011?
An extension of this question: Would there be any problem to run both of these on the same robot at the same time (after of course modifying the AxisCamera class as needed)?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Diffrences Of The 2009 Camera And 2011?
No problem at all. Out of curiosity, is this for processing on the cRIO, or sending back to dashboard?
Greg McKaskle |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Diffrences Of The 2009 Camera And 2011?
It would be for sending to the dashboard. Right now though it's all just a hypothetical (the head of our driver training is extremely prejudiced against using the camera feed to drive)
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Diffrences Of The 2009 Camera And 2011?
The reason I ask, is, the addition of the switch and some simple MJPG code makes it a much better experience than last year.
I will likely post an example next week that can be incorporated into a custom dashboard. If you want to forge ahead, you can get a reasonable prototype by configuring the cameras to be in the team IP range, plugging them into the switch, and on a laptop on the subnet, open up a browser window viewing a different camera in each. Greg McKaskle |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|