|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
Is it legal to use a vacumn in the robot arm?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
As long as your vacuum is powered by a legal FRC motor and the rest of your mechanism complies with the FRC 2011 Manual.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
I remember a lot of vacuums back in the days of Overdrive 2008; they were cool, but pretty ineffective.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
True, but think of team 25's vacuum last year. It was a highly effective means of holding on to the soccer ball. All in all, however, I think that a vacuum takes a lot of tweaking when compared to a "grabber" that can to the same thing.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
Indeed, and those soccer balls were a hell of a lot lighter than that darn track ball.
I'm fortunate enough to have one in my 19 year collection of game pieces. Last edited by mechE131 : 13-01-2011 at 09:58. Reason: fowl language? I guess? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
I think the most common issue with engineering is that it makes people aim to produce more creative methods instead of using effective methods. Innovation is a fantastic tool for solving problems, but sometimes your problems have already been solved in a more efficient way.
What does this method add in functionality or approach? If it doesn't alter the functionality and is only there to be cool, then it's a waste of time and energy. It is a cool concept, but don't let cool factor diminish functionality. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
Legal, yes, as long as it follows the specifications. However, keep some stuff in mind when dealing with suction of any sort:
1. The surface of suction needs to be fairly flat, otherwise there's no chance of getting a good seal. 2. The amount of suction required could be quite a bit. 3. The power requirement would be great. Remember, you have to carry the tube across the length of the field before you can score. So, yes, it'd be cool to have a vacuum robot. But our team found that there were just too many issues to justify it. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
Well if you can make the outcome just as efficient as a mechanical counterpart then the answer to my previous question is yes, it does increase functionality/efficiency.
I'm not trying to hinder any ideas from developing and flourishing further - I just wanted to give some advice. Our team has a bad habit of getting stuck on improving a particular idea - so much so that we do unnecessary things and waste time. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
Right now our team is stuck between claw/rollers, vacuum/suction cup, and a pincher for the grabbing mechanism. Have any teams prototyped any of these yet?
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|