|
|
|
 I tried to convince my team to use the force but no one would listen. - ngreen [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| I tried to convince my team to use the force but no one would listen. - ngreen [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
Well if you can make the outcome just as efficient as a mechanical counterpart then the answer to my previous question is yes, it does increase functionality/efficiency.
I'm not trying to hinder any ideas from developing and flourishing further - I just wanted to give some advice. Our team has a bad habit of getting stuck on improving a particular idea - so much so that we do unnecessary things and waste time. 
|
|
#2
15-01-2011, 11:51
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is assisting the robot arm with a vacumn legal?
Right now our team is stuck between claw/rollers, vacuum/suction cup, and a pincher for the grabbing mechanism. Have any teams prototyped any of these yet?
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
