|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The new 84 inches
With the new 84 inches rule for robot expansion i was wondering if any teams are considering a more defensive strategy more than before.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
On the contrary, the 84 inch rule is making my "dream" offensive robot possible.
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
How so??
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
How do you see a larger playing configuration as a means for defense? I may be missing something, but I see most extensions as too weak to perform well in a defensive strategy.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
With the 60 inch rule, my team had all but decided not to load tubes from the floor. We figured we would be a more valuable robot scoring on the top row in auto and either running back and forth from the load lane or just passing tubes that floor loading wasn't worth the effort.
With 84 inches my team has a lot more space to build a floor loader. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
My thinking was that your robot would expand and block a lane or be in front of the scoring zone. Playing pong with your the other robots.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
Quote:
Remember the danger - if you're playing defense with a super-wide robot, great. If you get pushed into the forbidden zone - penalty? Or does this fall under the penalty rule as the other team's fault? Jacob |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
Careful with that. You have to deal with R02a (not blocking or obstructing vision of drivers) and G48 (both possible entanglement risk, and all extensions out of frame perimeter are made at the own team's risk).
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
84" = 7'
Width between the lanes is 18'. 7/18 = .38888... = 38.9% Your "pong blocker" can only block 38.9% of the opponents scoring area at any given time. Just food for thought. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
On top of that, you (IFB662) are assuming that all of your opponents are slower than you, and less maneuverable than you. You'd best make sure that d-bot will be as effective as all get-out.
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
On top of that, that wall will take a pounding, so it needs to be strong, and that requires thickness. You won't be quite able to utilize the full 84" diameter circle due to the thickness.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
Quote:
yes but it is better than 5 feet. yeah that too idk just an idea i think first made defense hard this year |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
Quote:
Forklift + articulated grabber = easy solution to that problem, whether it be 60" or 84"... Not that I'm saying that it's the best solution, but it's one of the obvious ones! |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
Quote:
If you have two properly made pong blockers on an alliance, thats 100%. And we have this year's game breaker! |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: The new 84 inches
We really don't... Assuming the defensive robots can't be pushed with a long moment arm, and that two of them won't (a) ever get in each others' way, or (b) get crushed when their one offensive partner gets shut down, is, IMO, why an assumption makes a donkey out of you and upmtion!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|