|
|
|
 It definitely looked like a penalty, but in FRC if it looks like a penalty and smells like a penalty, well, unfortunately it might not be. - Basel A [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| It definitely looked like a penalty, but in FRC if it looks like a penalty and smells like a penalty, well, unfortunately it might not be. - Basel A [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
|
|
#2
20-01-2011, 15:00
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
Looks good! How heavy is the frame?
|
|
#4
20-01-2011, 15:46
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
What diameter wheels?
|
|
#6
20-01-2011, 18:11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
Weight: Honestly have no idea. I didn't do the chassis CAD and when I got a brief look at it today the material properties weren't set. The chassis parts are out of shop now but the second they get back I'll weigh them. It won't be the lightest thing in the world, but we prefer weight down low - with a 9 foot high arm having such a low CG will be immensely helpful.
The wheels are 4" diameter. Gotta love a flat field, right? The belts are internal for a few reasons. First, internal belt loops are cleaner and less in the way; the less space we take up in the center, the more room we have for things like electronics and our minibot deployment system. Second, they are less "open" so field debris cannot possibly get tangled with them. As for the drawbacks to internal belts, we saw them and minimized them. Maintenance was a big worry for me, but I'm now convinced it'll be not a problem. We tested these belts rigorously. Rapid speed changes, stalling the motors, mixes of both, and the belts did not skip or strip even once. Also, tensioning is not much of a problem. We have some fairly basic idlers in there for tension and it's a very much "set it and forget it" thing - once you get the belts right you never need to touch them again. Just in case, we did a timed run for a full belt change and it took about 7 minutes. We weren't satisfied, so we added the access window over the middle row, which is where most if not all of the holdup was. It should now be under 5 minutes to change a belt, and we plan on practicing those belt changes.
|
|
#7
20-01-2011, 18:16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
Are all the internals from Gates belting? Or did you use something else? Just curious.
|
|
#8
20-01-2011, 18:22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
Quote:
|
|
#9
21-01-2011, 10:57
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
Quote:
-Brando
|
|
#10
21-01-2011, 15:26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
I particularly enjoy seeing this design come to fruition from its initial stages. Ah the design process at work is a beautiful thing.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
