|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Sprocket legality?
Thanks for all the replys, they have all been great. I took this picture right after we put the sprocket in and now it does have a 2nd point of contact. Our arm is a 4 bar linkage with a 30in "finger" on the end of it and it weighs about 35lb, so I think our gear box should be fine. Our main mentor loved the idea of putting a guard on the chain, that will come out sometime tomorrow.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Sprocket legality?
a 35 lbs arm that is longer than a foot to its center of mass will be a problem for that bane bots. i would recommend some more reduction. ex, our wrist is similar, but weighs 15 lbs and the torque of the the gear setup powering it is well over 130 ft lbs.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Sprocket legality?
Quote:
Torque= Force X Distance 35 ft-lb=35lb X 1ft |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Sprocket legality?
Ok, quick update we kept the whole arm as our 30lbs with holding allowance, and it only weighed 22lbs!! Including the supports. So the p-60's were only lifting about 20lbs.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Sprocket legality?
I wonder if the banebot people monitor this forum or is it too much for them to endure.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Sprocket legality?
Please let us know here how that gearbox held up in competition, we're interested.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Sprocket legality?
The gearbox took competition like a boss!(after adding a new reduction stage and a 30t sprocket on top) We had no problems at all! It was a great year!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|