|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Drivetrain Concept
Quote:
<front> o o | | o o to this: <front> o-o o-o If that is the case you won't be able to turn. Last edited by lemiant : 29-08-2011 at 15:07. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Drivetrain Concept
good point
which represents the reasoning behind having 4 gearboxes. You limit mobility if you restrict the ways you can turn if you link front and back together. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Drivetrain Concept
I don't get it. You obviously can't have both front wheels and both back wheels together, because both sides are always doing the same thing, and you therefore can't turn. Also, if you try to make the front wheels do something different from the back wheels, you will just shred your tread (at best).
You CAN however have each side on one gearbox, and as already stated many times, there's no reason not to. Standard tank turning is accomplished by running each side at different speeds (or even different directions). |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Drivetrain Concept
yes it can be done and its a good approach and it is our fallback, but if you want to run traction in back and omni in front you can't have different ratios because the wheel size is different whereas if the the gearboxes are seperated the speeds themselves can be altered and allow for the two different wheel sizes to work together.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Drivetrain Concept
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|