|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [BB] Bills Blog 11/10/11
Why would this be a bad thing?
|
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [BB] Bills Blog 11/10/11
Depends on your perspective whether it's good or bad. It fails the "all tools down" test.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [BB] Bills Blog 11/10/11
I wouldn't say having more time to work on bumpers is extremely beneficial, but you could use the time to make the bumpers easier to come off/on, or in 148's case, add flashing red lights to it.
![]() |
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: [BB] Bills Blog 11/10/11
Why is there a debate about having extra time to build the bumpers? They have to be bagged at the same time as the robot and logged onto the lock-up form.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [BB] Bills Blog 11/10/11
you know, you don't HAVE to build the bumpers pre-bag. If it is like years past, couldn't you make them as part of the withholding allowance? (or has that been a confirmed change?)
of course, like anything, there is big difference between "can" and "should" |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|