Go to Post wonder if the April peak for 'frisbee launcher' was from the GDC... - cbudrecki [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2012, 09:08
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,112
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ring It Up! and Rack n' Roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule 1.3.4
In order to earn the Lifting Bonus, the lifted Robot must be fully supported by the Alliance partner’s Robot and not by any other game object.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcSol View Post
...that rule only talks about the final position of the 'lifted' robot and not how the robot became 'lifted'.
That rule defines the conditions for receiving the Lifting Bonus. It does not specify method, and neither do any other rules I saw. It doesn't even say that the partner's Robot must actually "lift" the lifted Robot; it says only that it must fully (and exclusively) support it.

If you still don't believe that a passive ramp applies, you're apparently assuming something that isn't in the rules. That box you think you see is only an illusion.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2012, 09:18
GBK GBK is offline
Registered User
FRC #1918 (NC GEARS)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Fremont, MI
Posts: 108
GBK is a glorious beacon of lightGBK is a glorious beacon of lightGBK is a glorious beacon of lightGBK is a glorious beacon of lightGBK is a glorious beacon of lightGBK is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Ring It Up! and Rack n' Roll

I think the reason this came up is the actual use of the work lifted vs elevated. Lifted implies a result of being lifted (verb) and elevated is typically translated as a position of something relative to other objects.
I am not saying that a ramp is not legal, but if you drive up on a ramp, to the top of a bot, you were not lifted there, even though you are now elevated above the playing surface.
Makes me wonder why the GDC chose the wording they did.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2012, 13:24
MarcSol's Avatar
MarcSol MarcSol is offline
FTC Mentor, FRC Ref, FLL Ref
FTC #5037 (got robot?)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Fox River Grove, IL
Posts: 15
MarcSol is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to MarcSol
Re: Ring It Up! and Rack n' Roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Anderson View Post
That rule defines the conditions for receiving the Lifting Bonus. It does not specify method, and neither do any other rules I saw. It doesn't even say that the partner's Robot must actually "lift" the lifted Robot; it says only that it must fully (and exclusively) support it.
Alan, the same paragraph also states (those are paragraph numbers not rule numbers. Rule numbers have a different format):
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paragraph 1.3.4
During the End Game (and not before), Robots may lift their Alliance partner’s Robot above the Playing Field floor to receive Lifting Bonus points.
Years of refereeing FIRST competitions have taught me to read every word carefully. If there is a way to misinterpret the words, they will be misinterpreted. The Manual specifically states that one Robot may lift another Robot to receive the Lifting Bonus, not that one Robot may allow another Robot to crawl up on it till the second Robot has elevated itself above the floor. This is Ring It Up! not Rack 'n Roll.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2012, 14:26
Taylor's Avatar
Taylor Taylor is offline
Professor of Thinkology, ThD
AKA: @taylorstem
FRC #3487 (EarthQuakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA 46227
Posts: 4,569
Taylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ring It Up! and Rack n' Roll

No matter what, a rules interpretation found on Chief Delphi is not binding. I'd suggest asking the official Q&A when it becomes available for a true ruling.
While I agree with the interpretation given by Alan and others, I do understand Marc's concerns - so a request for an official rules/terminology interpretation by the FTC GDC would be appropriate.

I agree that this game is more a reimagining of Triple Play - just twisted 90*.
__________________
Hi!
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2012, 18:59
MarcSol's Avatar
MarcSol MarcSol is offline
FTC Mentor, FRC Ref, FLL Ref
FTC #5037 (got robot?)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Fox River Grove, IL
Posts: 15
MarcSol is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to MarcSol
Re: Ring It Up! and Rack n' Roll

Taylor, I realize that rules interpretation on Chief Delphi is not binding, but in my conversations with Head Refs over the years I have heard many times that the views and concerns expressed on Chief Delphi do influence both the rulings of the GDCs as well as how Head Referees interpret the rules. Many rulings I have been told about started as questions and conversations here.

I actually hope Alan and the others are correct; I just question how they achieved their interpretations. Developing a ramp sounds much more feasible given the size of the FTC Robots than developing a lift mechanism.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-09-2012, 11:46
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,112
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ring It Up! and Rack n' Roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcSol View Post
I actually hope Alan and the others are correct; I just question how they achieved their interpretations.
My interpretation is easily explained. The scoring for a Lifted Robot is based on height above the floor tiles, on support, and on timing. The rules do not care how the Lifted Robot got where it is, as long as no field structure was used to help get it there and as long as it didn't start to get there before the End Game began.

The answer to your original question about how "lifting" is defined: It isn't. I don't believe that is an accidental omission.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-09-2012, 13:12
feverittm's Avatar
feverittm feverittm is offline
Registered User
FRC #0997 (Spartans)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 120
feverittm will become famous soon enoughfeverittm will become famous soon enough
Re: Ring It Up! and Rack n' Roll

Question from a FRC person. What are you FTC people thinking to tell the difference in weight of the rings?

I understand if people want to keep this a secret, but I am curious. I have my own ideas

Thanks
__________________
Floyd Moore
Mentor Electrical and Pneumatics
Team 997 - Spartan Robotics
Corvallis High School, Corvallis Oregon
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-09-2012, 14:44
Nemo's Avatar
Nemo Nemo is offline
Team 967 Mentor
AKA: Dan Niemitalo
FRC #0967 (Iron Lions)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 801
Nemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond reputeNemo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ring It Up! and Rack n' Roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by feverittm View Post
Question from a FRC person. What are you FTC people thinking to tell the difference in weight of the rings?

I understand if people want to keep this a secret, but I am curious. I have my own ideas

Thanks
HiTechnic came out with a force sensor on the day of the game release. We'll probably buy one of those and play with it as a start.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:47.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi