|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2451 PWNAGE Off-season 2012
In 2010 (prior to the current rule allowing COTS slip rings, and in the only year we had occasion to test the issue) slip rings were not mentioned in the rules, and any type of slip ring including COTS or home-made were disallowed by the Q&A forum. Prior to that they had been allowed by the Q&A Forum on several occasions, even though they were likewise not mentioned in the rules. Now that it is specified in the rules that they are allowed but must be COTS, it would seem that the issue is pretty clear cut, however there has been unpredictability on this issue with the Q&A Forum.
Last edited by jspatz1 : 21-12-2012 at 19:06. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 2451 PWNAGE Off-season 2012
Ignoring R 44, wouldn't R 49 come into place?
Quote:
Regardless, nice engineering exercise. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 2451 PWNAGE Off-season 2012
The rule concerns modifying motors used on the robot. While these parts come from a CIM, they are certainly not being used as a motor on the robot.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|