|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Looking at OPRs is fun, but they should be taken with a grain of salt.
After all, if matches were determined by the numbers, we wouldn't need to have competitions. I'll probably be more surprised than anyone if my team manages to go undefeated. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Surprises are fun.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Quote:
/sarcasm |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Especially OPR at previous events, some of which more than 4 weeks ago.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Our (2046's) projected rank is 96th with a record of 1-7-0... we're hoping, with some of the new tricks we've been working on, to do a little bit better than that
but with matches against 1114, 118, 610, and 1477 to name a few... it seems like the scheduling gods were not smiling upon us. I think we have a decent chance at coming out of quals 5-3-0 though. And there's always that possibility that these Preliminary schedules change... We'll see how it goes ![]() Good luck to everyone this week, we'll see you in St. Louis. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Quote:
-RC |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Also, remember that the fewer matches the team played in the more accurate the results!
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Suppose for a second though, that 610 (inexplicably, given their lack of 7disc floor pickup [they had a 5disker at ONWA, but removed it]) DOES seed #1.
Who do they pick? 118? 1114? someone else? 1114's scoring prowess is huge, but that would leave their alliance likely without a 7disc auto. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Quote:
But I think we're in the fourth layer of this hypothetical right now so I'll just wait here for Wednesday at 2:30 to get here so I can be in the car to StL. |
|
#11
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
Quote:
)610, 1114, 1323 |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
True story, 1772's OPR is all bad because of how they've played 50+ matches with varying problems being addressed. I like how 4452 is seeded 8th in someone's data. Rookies in the top 8 would be really cool.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
As would I. It would certainly be a step up from going 2-9 in the Portland Regional haha.
|
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
On the PRELIMINARY schedule, there is a match with 1114, 610, and 111 on an alliance (against 842). That should be fun to watch.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Galileo Division 2013
How did I possibly miss that? That's crazy, can't wait to watch.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|