|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6CIM WCD
Quote:
We used overly thick 1/8" gussets and a 1/16" solid belly pan this year instead of welding. Chassis was just as rigid, really. No noticeable performance or strength difference at all. Welding is not mandatory for this kind of drive. And there is definitely no need to do *both* permanently. ![]() Here's a picture of our setup. The thickness of the gusset and the number of rivets used were both excessive, but rivets are almost "free" in terms of weight. Last edited by Chris is me : 07-07-2013 at 11:07. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 6CIM WCD
What hasn't been mentioned yet is that belly pans are almost critical for resisting shear -- never mind torsion. My bosses at work call shear the forgotten force, and for good reason; it's more difficult to simulate than simple point/line loads or torsional loads. Something as thin as .025" sheet aluminum, even with additional lightening holes, will make your whole frame much stiffer when it experiences shear forces.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6CIM WCD
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6CIM WCD
Our 2011 and 2012 robots were entirely riveted, no welding of the frames. Our 2011 WCD was not noticably different from the others in terms of strength or rigidity.
I hate anecdotes, but I'll be a hypocrite; Rivets hold airplanes together. Also, the bellypan doesn't have to be exotic like 233/254 does. We made two of those and while they are cool, the resource cost is so high. We've run both garolite (G-10/FR4) and a high quality 6mm plywood with great results. Last edited by AdamHeard : 07-07-2013 at 16:21. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6CIM WCD
Quote:
Rivets are rigid enough to hold drivetrains together, no problem, just as you said. We riveted (and didn't weld) parts of our drivetrain together this year and the year before. After the rivets were installed, the drive was quite rigid. However, I definitely noticed a significant amount of play before the rivets were installed. I do wish I had taken more care to make sure the drive was square, as rivets aren't perfect for locating frame members together. A bellypan certainly would have helped with getting everything square before the rivets were installed. Riveting with a bellypan is probably perfectly square, strong and rigid. But, if the OP has TIG and MIG welders in house, why not learn to use them in the offseason? Just like I said before, it's perfectly fine to completely disregard my (or anyone else's) advice on CD. Personal experience and experimenting in the offseason should always trump what someone says on this forum. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6CIM WCD
Quote:
Not saying either method is a better fit universally for all teams, just adding more data to the discussion. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6CIM WCD
Quote:
They're known as "hole-grip clamps" on McMaster-Carr McMaster-Carr P/N: Tool- 5099A27 Cleco (3/16)- 5099A33 |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 6CIM WCD
Quote:
http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalo...heetholder.php |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 6CIM WCD
Quote:
I agree, personal experience does trump the forum, I do just want to expand on what Chris said a little bit. When we rivet our chassis together all of the parts including our rivet holes are machined on our HAAS Mill. We use a #11 drill (.191) for a slightly tighter fit. We rivet the gusset plates and chassis rails together. We then use clamps and a tape measure and compare the length from corner to corner in a X pattern and adjust the clamps as necessary to square the chassis (similar to woodworking). At that point we attach the belly pan (which is not pre-drilled.) When using rivets for structural members use High Strength Blind Rivets such as McMaster part number 98778A501 they have a much high shear strength than standard rivets. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6CIM WCD
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|