|
|
|
 Look at 71's 'walking' bot from last year. One dosn't need wheels/track to move. All you need is an idea. - Jack [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Look at 71's 'walking' bot from last year. One dosn't need wheels/track to move. All you need is an idea. - Jack [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Drivetrain Acceleration Model
Quote:
 
|
|
#2
21-09-2013, 21:04
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Drivetrain Acceleration Model
Quote:
Octave, Maxima, SciLab, AWK, and RLaB :-) Last edited by Ether : 21-09-2013 at 21:07.
|
|
#3
21-09-2013, 23:38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: paper: Drivetrain Acceleration Model
Which is still less weird than the weird case of coffeescript that I found while porting this by accident...
Turns out "variable *" compiles to "variable * variable" as opposed to throwing a compile error.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
