|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
And if you are worried about the 234 amps on the main breaker, allow me to show you the current graph as per the manufacturer ![]() As you can see, you can draw 200% (240 amps) for 10 seconds minimum, as per the specifications EDIT: link fixed? Last edited by BBray_T1296 : 25-01-2014 at 21:40. Reason: New link? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Any reason you chose to assemble the 2 gearboxes identically instead of mirror images (which would have made the drive symmetrical)?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
We have to pull the panels apart when we install the idler gears anyways, so we may yet change the configuration of the one gearbox, especially since it's not hard to switch. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
Anyways, that pic is a screenshot from this pdf, page 34 you will find our switch. So long as you do stay within the 40amps per motor, you should not need to worry too much about the main |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but doesn't adding the 3rd motor to the gearbox take some of the load off of the other two, thus making a breaker reset less likely? ![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
In normal driving, it does take a bit of load off the other motors, but in a pushing match where all motors are giving maximum output you have a larger chance of tripping the breaker with a 6 motor drive than a 4 motor drive. The solution is to just not get into heavy and sustained pushing matches.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
This tradeoff is something teams should carefully analyze and play with when deciding to use a 6 motor drive. Study the breaker spec sheets, both 40A and 120A. Experiment with different motors or robot cooling systems. Run a shifter and push in low gear. There are a lot of ways to try and mitigate this potential pitfall. (By the way, consider running a low gear that is traction limited with each motor drawing, say, 30 amps instead of 40, if you are extra paranoid) Last edited by Chris is me : 26-01-2014 at 13:55. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
![]() They could push for the entire season and not break a sweat with the motors, breakers, or batteries. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Having competed against their 2007 robot....
![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Correct, current = torque. So by adding a 3rd motor to each gearbox you reduce the load on the 40amp breakers while the load on the main breaker will remain the same for the same torque, regardless of motor count.
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
To answer your question, yes I did.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
so adding three motors doesn't increase torque? interesting.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Mad Crazy Drivetrain.
IMHO, this may be the year that Mecanums make it to Einstein. A defensive Robot that can strafe in the Goalie zone or between two robots passing is more akin to defensive play in Hockey, Soccer, and Basketball. Pushing or preventing is another issue, but that may not be the key to defense in Aerial Assist. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|