Go to Post You can never have enough figurative language. - Travis Hoffman [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-06-2014, 04:11 PM
Jared's Avatar
Jared Jared is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 602
Jared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond repute
pic: Gearbox

Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-06-2014, 04:12 PM
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Data Nerd
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,055
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Gearbox

No, your gearbox is not geared to X fps.. It's got a reduction. With a certain sized wheel it would drive a robot X fps.

What's the reductions?

What size wheel is it designed for?
__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-06-2014, 04:40 PM
rcmolloy's Avatar
rcmolloy rcmolloy is offline
Registered User
AKA: Robert Cory Molloy
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: San Luis Obispo, California
Posts: 424
rcmolloy has a reputation beyond reputercmolloy has a reputation beyond reputercmolloy has a reputation beyond reputercmolloy has a reputation beyond reputercmolloy has a reputation beyond reputercmolloy has a reputation beyond reputercmolloy has a reputation beyond reputercmolloy has a reputation beyond reputercmolloy has a reputation beyond reputercmolloy has a reputation beyond reputercmolloy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
No, your gearbox is not geared to X fps.. It's got a reduction. With a certain sized wheel it would drive a robot X fps.

What's the reductions?

What size wheel is it designed for?
3.25 Inch VersaWheel

First Stage - 11 to 54
Low Stage - 36 to 40
High Stage - 20 to 56
__________________
FRC 1647: Iron Devils - 2009 - 2011
FRC 973: Greybots - 2011 - 20XX
"While I was a student in FIRST, it was all about becoming inspired. Now as a mentor/engineering student, it's all about making sure learn everything I can so I can carry that on inspiration for future generations while having a hell of a lot of fun!"
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-06-2014, 05:12 PM
Jared's Avatar
Jared Jared is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 602
Jared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
No, your gearbox is not geared to X fps.. It's got a reduction. With a certain sized wheel it would drive a robot X fps.

What's the reductions?

What size wheel is it designed for?
Sorry. I meant to post the picture with the 3.25" versa wheel DT so people could see how it mounts.

It is designed for a 3" to a 3.25" wheel. It can work with the 3" colson, and can go faster if the CIM gear is swapped to an 12, 13, or 14 tooth gear.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcmolloy View Post
3.25 Inch VersaWheel

First Stage - 11 to 54
Low Stage - 36 to 40
High Stage - 20 to 56
The overall reductions are 5.45:1 and 13.75:1, which are a little fast for 2 CIMs driving a 3.25" wheel. I plan to add an rs-775 to the gearbox.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-06-2014, 11:10 PM
TheHolyHades1 TheHolyHades1 is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 145
TheHolyHades1 is a jewel in the roughTheHolyHades1 is a jewel in the roughTheHolyHades1 is a jewel in the rough
Re: pic: Gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared View Post
Sorry. I meant to post the picture with the 3.25" versa wheel DT so people could see how it mounts.

It is designed for a 3" to a 3.25" wheel. It can work with the 3" colson, and can go faster if the CIM gear is swapped to an 12, 13, or 14 tooth gear.



The overall reductions are 5.45:1 and 13.75:1, which are a little fast for 2 CIMs driving a 3.25" wheel. I plan to add an rs-775 to the gearbox.
I'm not sure adding an rs775 to the gearbox is a good idea. I'm pretty sure the rpm curve is different for the rs775 as compared to the cim (whereas I think the miniCIM is meant to have a very similar/the same curve). This could mean that the motors are trying to drive each other to some degree instead of all working together to drive the wheel.

Of course, I could also just be completely wrong here ... I'd love someone to confirm/deny what I'm saying with a better explanation.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-07-2014, 10:42 AM
Jared's Avatar
Jared Jared is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 602
Jared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHolyHades1 View Post
I'm not sure adding an rs775 to the gearbox is a good idea. I'm pretty sure the rpm curve is different for the rs775 as compared to the cim (whereas I think the miniCIM is meant to have a very similar/the same curve). This could mean that the motors are trying to drive each other to some degree instead of all working together to drive the wheel.

Of course, I could also just be completely wrong here ... I'd love someone to confirm/deny what I'm saying with a better explanation.
It is possible to add a motor to a gearbox that has a different curve as long as you take into account the specifications of the motor you are adding. Team like 254 and 118 have both done this in the past, and our team did it in 2003. The motors will only fight each other if one is forced to travel faster than its free speed by another. Because drive gearboxes will operate at both really slow and really fast speeds, it makes sense to match their free speeds, so that their is no condition where one motor forces another motor to go faster than its free speed.

If you are interested, here's an example of a single CIM and one rs-775 gearbox, with free speeds not matched, then matched. To get these, you need to find what the rpm of each motor will be, use the motor data to calculate the torque at the shaft of each motor, then you need to find the torque at the output, which is the CIM motor shaft in all these examples.

Code:
                Free Speed	Stall Torque	Stall Current	Free Current (Amp)	Power (W)

CIM	        5310	        2.43	        133.00	        2.70	                337.81
RS-775 (12V)	13000	        0.78	        86.67	        1.80	                266.60

CIM torque (Nm) vs. rpm

R/5310 + τ/2.43 = 1

τ/2.43 = 1 - R/5310

τ = 2.43 - R*0.000457627


RS-775 torque (Nm) vs. rpm

R/13000 + τ/0.78 = 1

τ/0.78 = 1 - R/13000

τ = 0.78 - R*0.00006


with same gear ratio, both at 12V, at 6000 rpm (this is possible)

τ775 = .78 - 6000(.00006) = 0.42

τCIM = 2.43 - 6000(0.000457627) = −0.315762 The CIM is providing resistance, and reducing availible torque

Total torque = 0.104 Nm


geared so that free speeds match at 5310 (2.45:1), at 12v, at 3000 rpm (nothing higher than 5310 is possible) The rs-775 will be geared down.

rpm of the 775 will be (2.45 X 3000) = 7350

τ775 = .78 - 7350(.00006) = .339 this is at the shaft of the motor

at the CIM, it will be 2.45 times more = .83055

τCIM = 2.43 - 3000(0.000457627) = 1.057119

Total torque = 1.888 Nm

It makes sense because when free speeds are matched, no motor ever has to push the other past its free speed, so the torque contributed by each motor will always be positive, and the CIM will always contribute more. The ratio between the contributed torque of the CIM and the contributed torque of the rs-775 will always be equal to the ratio of their power, if the free speed is matched. The ratio is about 79:100 for the rs-775 to the CIM.

Last edited by Jared : 06-07-2014 at 10:47 AM. Reason: left out a part.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi