|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
Last edited by jwfoss : 30-10-2014 at 12:33. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
I'll be the first to attest that this drivetrain is a BEAST. For reasons I have yet to figure out, it could manhandle almost any bot on the field... Including 2 speeds.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
Looks good, I like the purple.
Why did you opt for 3/8" solid bolts as dead axles instead of using 1/4"-20 bolts going through 1/2" tube axle? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
The dead axle WCP Colson hubs are already bored out for 3/8" bearings.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
You can use the 1/2" I'D x 7/8" OD bearings as well. Allowing teams to use tube axle.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
Just curious, what is the benefit of that? To save weight? Smaller holes in the frame?
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
Truth this setup was a beast.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
I'm curious if anybody has run these for a season. My gut would think the smaller balls of these bearings would reduce their load carrying capacity to the point where I'd be concerned about an ill-timed bearing explosion. But I haven't tested it, run numbers, etc. so I'd love to hear some reports of teams having success with this setup.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
The tube axle becomes a frame member and dramatically increases the rigidity of that chassis section. When using the 3/8" bolts you can't tighten the bolts since that would bend the frame. With the tube axle setup you preload the bolts to achieve greater chassis strength.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
Did you guys slit the colson wheels at all? Or run them stock?
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
Quote:
Personally, I don't think the cost of implementation is worth the benefit of the added traction. Colsons are already up there in the traction world. They're just under blue nitrile if I remember correctly and slitting them still doesn't get them to nitrile's level. Their wear characteristics far outplay any wheel I've seen in FRC, though. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
Quote:
Ideally in this configuration, you would use standoffs around the axle to provide stiffness. That adds more parts, more weight, etc. Not hard to do, but you are limited to using the mounting holes provided by the DIAD, chain routing, etc. Anyone have thoughts on using 3/8" steel rod as dead axles? Tap both ends of the axle and it'd be close to using tube axle/bolt. I wouldn't think a 1/4"-20 bolt would work...not enough thickness left in the rod. Something smaller like a #10 or #8...at which point you would have to drill all 4 holes in the DIAD sideplate, rather than using the pre-punched 1/4" hole for the outer wheels (of the 8wd)...but it could work. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
Quote:
As for maintaining proper wheel alignment & spacing - I'd recommend any solid non-deforming material for standoffs. The dark-grey plastic from Andymark works great (it's why it's in the KOP, or was last time I used a KOP). I agree that the axle itself should NOT be used to stiffen a frame. The only load you want on a wheel axle is normal to the floor so it rides correctly on the balls inside the bearing. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC558's modified VEXpro Drive in a Day
Quote:
Last edited by TD78 : 30-10-2014 at 09:41. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|